Compare StocksROK vs V

Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ROK is overvalued at $474, with a DCF intrinsic value of $215 and a margin of safety of -120%. V is fairly valued at $327, with an intrinsic value of $304 and a margin of safety of -8%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$473.79
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$327.24

Rewards

ROK
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 25.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ROK
  • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 49.1x is 38% above the historical average of 35.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
V
  • Insiders have sold $14.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ROK
V
Valuation
$1.36B
Free Cash Flow
$20.84B
2.58%
FCF Yield
3.35%
49.10
Trailing P/E
28.55
32.62
Forward P/E
22.02
Quality & Moat
18.89%
ROIC
38.39%
27.18%
ROE
60.35%
48.92%
Gross Margin
97.78%
2.03
PEG Ratio
1.46
Balance Sheet Safety
1.02
Net Debt / Equity
0.28
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.84
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.33
1.17%
Dividend Yield
0.80%
ROK: 1Ties: 1V: 10
ROKV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ROK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ROK
$9.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ROK
120.2% Overvalued
Price is 120.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.79
Fair Value: $215.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
7.6% Overvalued
Price is 7.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $327.24
Fair Value: $304.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ROK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $474?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.6%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $327?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.4%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ROK
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ROK
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ROK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,920
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,856
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ROK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ROK
11
Sells (3M)
49
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $38.51M
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$173,612
@ $460.51 · 2026-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$99,482
@ $456.34 · 2026-06-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$449,025
@ $426.02 · 2026-05-20
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$1.82M
@ $451.97 · 2026-05-07
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$246,252
@ $447.73 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$269,748
@ $449.58 · 2026-05-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $446.43 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$480,000
@ $400.00 · 2026-04-13
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$78,209
@ $394.99 · 2026-04-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$484,375
@ $387.50 · 2026-04-08
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$107,341
@ $359.00 · 2026-04-02
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$3.56M
@ $398.92 · 2026-03-02
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$5.93M
@ $410.01 · 2026-02-26
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$4.89M
@ $404.27 · 2026-02-25
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$7.04M
@ $404.61 · 2026-02-25
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$485,050
@ $404.21 · 2026-02-25
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$812,599
@ $409.37 · 2026-02-25
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$515,628
@ $405.69 · 2026-02-25
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$77,548
@ $380.14 · 2026-02-17
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$313,600
@ $392.00 · 2026-01-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$46,999
@ $401.70 · 2025-12-10
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$823,435
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$438,542
@ $401.60 · 2025-12-10
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$664,640
@ $401.84 · 2025-12-10
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,792
@ $401.38 · 2025-12-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$828,475
@ $402.37 · 2025-12-10
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$550,861
@ $401.80 · 2025-12-10
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$114,934
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$116,500
@ $401.72 · 2025-12-10
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$388,205
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$184,676
@ $401.47 · 2025-12-10
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$12,087
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$149,476
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$51,981
@ $402.95 · 2025-12-05
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$113,607
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$118,860
@ $402.92 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$1.42M
@ $403.04 · 2025-12-05
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$149,486
@ $402.93 · 2025-12-05
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$24,173
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$27,396
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$56,004
@ $402.91 · 2025-12-05
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$74,127
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$300,030
@ $365.00 · 2025-10-29
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$87,500
@ $350.00 · 2025-09-11
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$35,552
@ $345.17 · 2025-09-08
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$127,181
@ $348.44 · 2025-08-29
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$499,500
@ $348.08 · 2025-08-29
KEANE JAMES P
Director
$1.07M
@ $356.06 · 2025-08-26
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$830,730
@ $350.67 · 2025-07-17
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$171,134
@ $325.35 · 2025-06-11
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$179,796
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$94,310
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$81,583
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$118,454
@ $326.32 · 2025-06-09
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$96,913
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$161,197
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,023
@ $318.15 · 2025-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$141,758
@ $315.02 · 2025-05-29
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$558,038
@ $310.02 · 2025-05-13
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.58M
@ $304.18 · 2025-05-12
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$285,682
@ $304.24 · 2025-05-12
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$760,321
@ $304.13 · 2025-05-12
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$518,651
@ $304.37 · 2025-05-12
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.48M
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$147,504
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$75,500
@ $257.68 · 2025-04-02
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$501,858
@ $286.78 · 2025-03-03
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$71,928
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$351,364
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$248,810
@ $284.03 · 2025-02-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $53.88M
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ROK
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ROK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View ROK Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ROK vs V

Is Rockwell Automation, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -7.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $304 vs. price $327), compared to ROK's -120.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $215 vs. $474).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while ROK scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

Visa Inc. (V) generates a 3.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s 2.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

V earns 38.4% ROIC versus ROK's 18.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ROK's 84/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.