Compare StocksROK vs UNH

Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ROK is overvalued at $474, with a DCF intrinsic value of $215 and a margin of safety of -120%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$473.79
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

ROK
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 25.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

ROK
  • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 49.1x is 38% above the historical average of 35.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ROK
UNH
Valuation
$1.36B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
2.58%
FCF Yield
4.86%
49.10
Trailing P/E
30.17
32.62
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
18.89%
ROIC
15.60%
27.18%
ROE
12.18%
48.92%
Gross Margin
18.80%
2.03
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
1.02
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.84
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
1.17%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
ROK: 4Ties: 1UNH: 7
ROKUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ROK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ROK
$9.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ROK
120.2% Overvalued
Price is 120.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.79
Fair Value: $215.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ROK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $474?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.6%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ROK
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ROK
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ROK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,920
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ROK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ROK
11
Sells (3M)
49
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $38.51M
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$173,612
@ $460.51 · 2026-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$99,482
@ $456.34 · 2026-06-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$449,025
@ $426.02 · 2026-05-20
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$1.82M
@ $451.97 · 2026-05-07
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$246,252
@ $447.73 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$269,748
@ $449.58 · 2026-05-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $446.43 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$480,000
@ $400.00 · 2026-04-13
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$78,209
@ $394.99 · 2026-04-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$484,375
@ $387.50 · 2026-04-08
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$107,341
@ $359.00 · 2026-04-02
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$3.56M
@ $398.92 · 2026-03-02
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$5.93M
@ $410.01 · 2026-02-26
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$4.89M
@ $404.27 · 2026-02-25
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$7.04M
@ $404.61 · 2026-02-25
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$485,050
@ $404.21 · 2026-02-25
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$812,599
@ $409.37 · 2026-02-25
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$515,628
@ $405.69 · 2026-02-25
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$77,548
@ $380.14 · 2026-02-17
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$313,600
@ $392.00 · 2026-01-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$46,999
@ $401.70 · 2025-12-10
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$823,435
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$438,542
@ $401.60 · 2025-12-10
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$664,640
@ $401.84 · 2025-12-10
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,792
@ $401.38 · 2025-12-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$828,475
@ $402.37 · 2025-12-10
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$550,861
@ $401.80 · 2025-12-10
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$114,934
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$116,500
@ $401.72 · 2025-12-10
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$388,205
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$184,676
@ $401.47 · 2025-12-10
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$12,087
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$149,476
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$51,981
@ $402.95 · 2025-12-05
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$113,607
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$118,860
@ $402.92 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$1.42M
@ $403.04 · 2025-12-05
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$149,486
@ $402.93 · 2025-12-05
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$24,173
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$27,396
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$56,004
@ $402.91 · 2025-12-05
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$74,127
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$300,030
@ $365.00 · 2025-10-29
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$87,500
@ $350.00 · 2025-09-11
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$35,552
@ $345.17 · 2025-09-08
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$127,181
@ $348.44 · 2025-08-29
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$499,500
@ $348.08 · 2025-08-29
KEANE JAMES P
Director
$1.07M
@ $356.06 · 2025-08-26
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$830,730
@ $350.67 · 2025-07-17
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$171,134
@ $325.35 · 2025-06-11
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$179,796
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$94,310
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$81,583
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$118,454
@ $326.32 · 2025-06-09
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$96,913
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$161,197
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,023
@ $318.15 · 2025-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$141,758
@ $315.02 · 2025-05-29
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$558,038
@ $310.02 · 2025-05-13
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.58M
@ $304.18 · 2025-05-12
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$285,682
@ $304.24 · 2025-05-12
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$760,321
@ $304.13 · 2025-05-12
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$518,651
@ $304.37 · 2025-05-12
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.48M
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$147,504
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$75,500
@ $257.68 · 2025-04-02
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$501,858
@ $286.78 · 2025-03-03
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$71,928
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$351,364
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$248,810
@ $284.03 · 2025-02-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ROK
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ROK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View ROK Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ROK vs UNH

Is Rockwell Automation, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to ROK's -120.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $215 vs. $474).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while ROK scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROK scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s 2.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Rockwell Automation, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

ROK earns 18.9% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to ROK's 84/100 (Very Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.