Compare StocksRMD vs TSLA

ResMed Inc. (RMD) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)

RMD
ResMed Inc.
$205.02
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$390.82

Rewards

RMD
  • ResMed Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 62.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ResMed Inc. scores 96/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
TSLA
  • Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -2.6x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

RMD
  • 9 insider sales totaling $5.7M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
TSLA
  • ROIC has declined by 17.7 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 19.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
RMD
TSLA
Valuation
$1.45B
Free Cash Flow
$5.25B
4.84%
FCF Yield
0.36%
19.77
Trailing P/E
358.55
16.86
Forward P/E
154.15
Quality & Moat
21.07%
ROIC
3.23%
21.58%
ROE
4.47%
62.18%
Gross Margin
19.06%
1.88
PEG Ratio
43.20
Balance Sheet Safety
0.13
Debt / Equity
0.19
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.39
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.60
1.17%
Dividend Yield
N/A
RMD: 8Ties: 1TSLA: 2
RMDTSLA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
RMD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
RMD
$1.94
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.79B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
RMD
11.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 11.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $205.02
Fair Value: $232.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
541.1% Overvalued
Price is 541.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $390.82
Fair Value: $60.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
RMD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $205?

+8.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.8%

The market implies +8.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $391?

+49.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +44.8%

The market implies +49.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +44.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
RMD
96/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
RMD
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
RMD
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 68.6%Retail & Other 30.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,404
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 11.1%Institutions 44.7%Retail & Other 44.2%
No. of Institutional Holders5,238
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
RMD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $999.96M
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
RMD
9
Sells (3M)
44
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $33.74M
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.13M
@ $225.50 · 2026-04-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$450,000
@ $225.00 · 2026-04-01
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$224,310
@ $224.31 · 2026-04-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.03 · 2026-03-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$520,440
@ $260.22 · 2026-03-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$254,300
@ $254.30 · 2026-03-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.37M
@ $273.78 · 2026-02-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,620
@ $251.31 · 2026-02-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$13,000
@ $260.00 · 2026-02-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$257,030
@ $257.03 · 2026-02-02
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,660
@ $248.83 · 2026-01-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.24M
@ $248.46 · 2026-01-07
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,088
@ $241.76 · 2026-01-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$241,750
@ $241.75 · 2026-01-02
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $251.41 · 2025-12-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$502,940
@ $251.47 · 2025-12-03
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$12,208
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,160
@ $244.16 · 2025-12-01
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$524,025
@ $255.00 · 2025-11-25
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$504,100
@ $252.05 · 2025-11-12
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$121,872
@ $250.25 · 2025-11-11
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.00M
@ $249.75 · 2025-11-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$742,620
@ $247.54 · 2025-11-03
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.27M
@ $282.85 · 2025-10-07
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$27,436
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$823,080
@ $274.36 · 2025-10-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $278.14 · 2025-09-08
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$812,310
@ $270.77 · 2025-09-02
HERNANDEZ JOHN
Director
$739,289
@ $287.10 · 2025-08-18
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.24M
@ $279.48 · 2025-08-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$845,700
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,095
@ $281.90 · 2025-08-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.06M
@ $256.72 · 2025-07-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$241,438
@ $255.49 · 2025-07-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$997,892
@ $256.99 · 2025-07-01
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$16,961
@ $256.98 · 2025-07-01
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.01M
@ $251.21 · 2025-06-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$494,640
@ $247.32 · 2025-06-04
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$243,780
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$9,995
@ $243.78 · 2025-06-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$891,286
@ $244.59 · 2025-05-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$486,940
@ $243.47 · 2025-05-20
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,500
@ $242.25 · 2025-05-07
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.95M
@ $243.23 · 2025-05-07
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$215,580
@ $215.58 · 2025-04-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.68M
@ $209.85 · 2025-04-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$439,480
@ $219.74 · 2025-04-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$14,263
@ $222.86 · 2025-04-01
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.33M
@ $239.31 · 2025-03-10
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$230,360
@ $230.36 · 2025-03-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.84M
@ $229.20 · 2025-03-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$455,420
@ $227.71 · 2025-03-05
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.15M
@ $235.40 · 2025-03-03
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$14,982
@ $234.09 · 2025-03-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$238,980
@ $238.98 · 2025-02-10
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.90M
@ $236.77 · 2025-02-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$484,220
@ $242.11 · 2025-02-05
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$15,515
@ $242.42 · 2025-02-03
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$234,040
@ $234.04 · 2025-01-08
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$461,980
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
RIDER MICHAEL J
General Counsel
$17,324
@ $230.99 · 2025-01-02
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$244,230
@ $244.23 · 2024-12-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$491,300
@ $245.65 · 2024-12-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$18,419
@ $248.91 · 2024-12-02
LEONG JUSTIN
Officer
$1.50M
@ $243.09 · 2024-11-22
DE WITTE JAN
Director
$198,053
@ $248.81 · 2024-11-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$249,000
@ $249.00 · 2024-11-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.62M
@ $246.26 · 2024-11-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$497,480
@ $248.74 · 2024-11-06
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$16,698
@ $242.00 · 2024-11-01
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.02M
@ $238.48 · 2024-10-11
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$233,470
@ $233.47 · 2024-10-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.41M
@ $231.91 · 2024-10-07
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$474,400
@ $237.20 · 2024-10-02
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$1.26M
@ $252.56 · 2024-09-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$246,420
@ $246.42 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $248.38 · 2024-09-09
FARRELL PETER CRAIG
Director
$479,800
@ $239.90 · 2024-09-04
RIDER MICHAEL J
Officer
$203,742
@ $231.00 · 2024-08-20
GHOSHAL KAUSHIK
Officer
$2.17M
@ $216.60 · 2024-08-12
SANDERCOCK BRETT
Chief Financial Officer
$212,160
@ $212.16 · 2024-08-08
FARRELL MICHAEL J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.15M
@ $214.25 · 2024-08-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $294.75M
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.27M
@ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$15.14M
@ $250.23 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.01M
@ $251.76 · 2024-11-01
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-10-24
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $250.00 · 2024-09-23
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$65,867
@ $221.77 · 2024-09-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$14.60M
@ $219.96 · 2024-07-25
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$113,151
@ $174.35 · 2024-06-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$17.32M
@ $184.86 · 2024-05-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
RMD
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
RMD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
TSLA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View RMD Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis
RMD vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io