Compare StocksQCOM vs ZBH

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$167.31
VS
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$83.24

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
ZBH
  • Gross margin of 70.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.57 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Dividend yield of 1.16% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 7.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
ZBH

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    ZBH
    Valuation
    $12.82B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.42B
    7.27%
    FCF Yield
    8.81%
    18.01
    Trailing P/E
    21.56
    15.74
    Forward P/E
    9.26
    Quality & Moat
    18.22%
    ROIC
    6.45%
    20.31%
    ROE
    5.56%
    54.80%
    Gross Margin
    70.18%
    0.10
    PEG Ratio
    0.63
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.56
    Debt / Equity
    0.60
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.42
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.75
    2.08%
    Dividend Yield
    1.16%
    QCOM: 8Ties: 1ZBH: 3
    QCOMZBH

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ZBH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    $5.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.96B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$60.46B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ZBH
    $-4.43
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $2.05B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-9.07B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    122.2% Overvalued
    Price is 122.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $167.31
    Fair Value: $75.29
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ZBH
    140.9% Overvalued
    Price is 140.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $83.24
    Fair Value: $34.55
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $167?

    +14.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +3.0%

    The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    ZBH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $83?

    +14.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +5.0%

    The market implies +14.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ZBH
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    -3.16
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ZBH
    -2.58
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 82.7%Retail & Other 17.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,708
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ZBH
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 104.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,305
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ZBH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    3
    Sells (3M)
    16
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.70M
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $325,854
    @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,815
    @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $458,799
    @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $577,620
    @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.28M
    @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $567,702
    @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $522,808
    @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $122,463
    @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,610
    @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $537,560
    @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $486,965
    @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $120,808
    @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $465,846
    @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $91,442
    @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $119,900
    @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,262
    @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $523,292
    @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $130,074
    @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,397
    @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $463,851
    @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $409,056
    @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,617
    @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $202,120
    @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $491,349
    @ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $313,779
    @ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $539,157
    @ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $497,848
    @ $165.95 · 2024-10-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ZBH
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $950,612
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $250,849
    @ $94.66 · 2026-03-12
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $96,490
    @ $96.49 · 2026-02-12
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $124,302
    @ $103.58 · 2025-09-11
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $156,225
    @ $104.15 · 2025-09-08
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $153,735
    @ $102.49 · 2025-08-18
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $74,011
    @ $92.51 · 2025-06-13
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $95,000
    @ $95.00 · 2025-06-11
    WINKLER LORI
    Officer
    $150,649
    @ $104.40 · 2025-03-05
    YI SANG
    Officer
    $1.47M
    @ $114.69 · 2024-05-31
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(59/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ZBH
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(25/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
    ZBH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
    View QCOM Full AnalysisView ZBH Full Analysis
    QCOM vs ZBH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io