Compare StocksQCOM vs WY

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. WY is overvalued at $24, with an intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. Of the two, QCOM has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
$24.32

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
WY

    Risks

    QCOM
    • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    WY
    • ROIC has declined by 13.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Gross margin of 14.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Weyerhaeuser Company scores only 19/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    WY
    Valuation
    $12.82B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-45.88M
    5.38%
    FCF Yield
    -0.26%
    24.34
    Trailing P/E
    43.43
    21.20
    Forward P/E
    34.89
    Quality & Moat
    18.22%
    ROIC
    3.27%
    36.08%
    ROE
    4.16%
    54.80%
    Gross Margin
    14.67%
    0.91
    PEG Ratio
    1.86
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.20
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.55
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.42
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    7.38
    1.72%
    Dividend Yield
    3.39%
    QCOM: 10Ties: 1WY: 1
    QCOMWY

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    WY

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    $5.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.96B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$60.46B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    WY
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-947.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-5.65B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    178.3% Overvalued
    Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $226.11
    Fair Value: $81.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    WY
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $24.32
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

    +17.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +7.0%

    The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    WY

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    WY
    19/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    -3.16
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    WY
    -2.46
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,615
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    WY
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 6.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,244
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    WY
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $822,766
    O'ROURKE JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $101,400
    @ $25.35 · 2026-02-20
    BECKWITT RICHARD
    Director
    $514,000
    @ $25.70 · 2026-02-19
    LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
    Director
    $106,226
    @ $23.61 · 2025-12-17
    LEWIS SARA GROOTWASSINK
    Director
    $101,140
    @ $25.29 · 2025-08-11
    O'ROURKE JAMES CALVIN
    Director
    $249,676
    @ $32.01 · 2024-09-13
    MONACO ALBERT
    Director
    $988,376
    @ $31.38 · 2024-08-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    3
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.65M
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,380
    @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $529,741
    @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $325,854
    @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,815
    @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $458,799
    @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $577,620
    @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.28M
    @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $567,702
    @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $522,808
    @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $122,463
    @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,610
    @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $537,560
    @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $486,965
    @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $120,808
    @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $465,846
    @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $91,442
    @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $119,900
    @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,262
    @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $523,292
    @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $130,074
    @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,397
    @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $463,851
    @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $409,056
    @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,617
    @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $202,120
    @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $491,349
    @ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $313,779
    @ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $539,157
    @ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    WY
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.39M
    CHANEY BRIAN K
    Officer
    $288,037
    @ $25.82 · 2026-02-03
    STOCKFISH DEVIN W
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.10M
    @ $23.33 · 2025-12-15
    WILLIAMS KIM
    Director
    $369,252
    @ $30.77 · 2024-08-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    WY
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(52/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    WY
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
    View QCOM Full AnalysisView WY Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs WY

    Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Weyerhaeuser Company more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, QCOM trades at a -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $128 vs. price $226), compared to WY's -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $0 vs. $24).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Weyerhaeuser Company?

    QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while WY scores 19/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Weyerhaeuser Company in financial distress?

    WY's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Weyerhaeuser Company?

    QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Weyerhaeuser Company's -0.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Weyerhaeuser Company?

    QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus WY's 3.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Weyerhaeuser Company's?

    QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to WY's 30/100 (Unsafe). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.