Compare StocksQCOM vs WDAY

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Workday, Inc. (WDAY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, QCOM is overvalued at $148, with a DCF intrinsic value of $127 and a margin of safety of -16%. WDAY is overvalued at $160, with an intrinsic value of $136 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, QCOM has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$147.61
VS
WDAY
Workday, Inc.
$160.34

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
WDAY
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.32 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
WDAY
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 9 insider sales totaling $73.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
WDAY
Valuation
$10.24B
Free Cash Flow
$3.12B
6.61%
FCF Yield
7.88%
16.87
Trailing P/E
49.95
14.34
Forward P/E
12.68
Quality & Moat
15.03%
ROIC
9.87%
33.75%
ROE
10.86%
54.23%
Gross Margin
75.77%
0.63
PEG Ratio
0.63
Balance Sheet Safety
0.25
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.36
2.49%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
QCOM: 5Ties: 2WDAY: 5
QCOMWDAY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

WDAY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
WDAY
$-12.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.60B
Δ Market Cap
$-31.29B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
84.2% Overvalued
Price is 84.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.61
Fair Value: $80.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
WDAY
17.8% Overvalued
Price is 17.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $160.34
Fair Value: $136.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $148?

+11.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

WDAY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $160?

+18.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.3%

The market implies +18.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +1.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
WDAY
51/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
WDAY
-2.79
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
WDAY
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 107.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,422
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
WDAY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.57M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$452,030
@ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
WDAY
9
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $233.47M
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$130,530
@ $142.19 · 2026-07-10
ROWE ZANE C
Chief Financial Officer
$862,203
@ $143.70 · 2026-07-07
KAZMAIER GERRIT S
Officer
$391,785
@ $143.62 · 2026-07-07
ENSLIN ROBERT
President
$724,972
@ $134.90 · 2026-07-02
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$13.12M
@ $122.04 · 2026-06-30
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$12.28M
@ $114.25 · 2026-06-22
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$13.44M
@ $124.99 · 2026-06-17
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$16.08M
@ $149.56 · 2026-06-04
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$16.84M
@ $156.64 · 2026-06-01
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$179,184
@ $113.05 · 2026-04-10
ROWE ZANE C
Chief Financial Officer
$769,314
@ $128.22 · 2026-04-07
KAZMAIER GERRIT S
Officer
$1.20M
@ $128.39 · 2026-04-07
ENSLIN ROBERT
President
$695,339
@ $129.41 · 2026-04-06
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$13.80M
@ $128.35 · 2026-03-26
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$14.25M
@ $132.58 · 2026-03-18
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$15.28M
@ $142.18 · 2026-03-10
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$14.45M
@ $134.40 · 2026-03-02
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$199,711
@ $209.56 · 2026-01-08
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.39M
@ $209.75 · 2026-01-08
SAUER RICHARD HARRY
Officer
$237,300
@ $210.00 · 2026-01-06
ROWE ZANE C
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $208.75 · 2026-01-06
KAZMAIER GERRIT S
Officer
$784,626
@ $208.73 · 2026-01-06
ENSLIN ROBERT
President
$4.66M
@ $210.17 · 2026-01-05
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$16.73M
@ $205.29 · 2026-01-02
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.26M
@ $215.04 · 2025-12-23
KAZMAIER GERRIT S
Officer
$1.43M
@ $218.77 · 2025-12-19
MCNAMARA MICHAEL MAX
Director
$1.27M
@ $235.16 · 2025-10-10
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$457,601
@ $238.96 · 2025-10-09
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.74M
@ $236.34 · 2025-10-08
SAUER RICHARD HARRY
Officer
$547,220
@ $235.87 · 2025-10-07
ROWE ZANE C
Chief Financial Officer
$1.40M
@ $232.62 · 2025-10-07
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.09M
@ $235.09 · 2025-10-01
SAUER RICHARD HARRY
Officer
$273,076
@ $235.41 · 2025-09-17
SAUER RICHARD HARRY
Officer
$262,891
@ $226.63 · 2025-09-11
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$105,922
@ $234.86 · 2025-07-10
ROWE ZANE C
Chief Financial Officer
$1.44M
@ $239.59 · 2025-07-08
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.38M
@ $239.61 · 2025-07-08
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.44M
@ $246.84 · 2025-06-02
GARFIELD MARK S.
Officer
$112,595
@ $226.55 · 2025-04-10
DUFFIELD DAVID A.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$17.55M
@ $250.26 · 2025-03-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😨Fear(27/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
WDAY
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
WDAY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView WDAY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs WDAY

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Workday, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, QCOM trades at a -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127 vs. price $148), compared to WDAY's -17.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $136 vs. $160).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Workday, Inc.?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while WDAY scores 51/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Workday, Inc.?

Workday, Inc. (WDAY) generates a 7.9% free cash flow yield, compared to QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Workday, Inc.?

QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus WDAY's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.