Compare StocksQCOM vs VTR

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Ventas, Inc. (VTR): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. VTR is undervalued at $82, with an intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 39%. Of the two, VTR has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
$81.60

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
VTR
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
VTR
  • Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.78 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
VTR
Valuation
$12.82B
Free Cash Flow
$1.48B
5.38%
FCF Yield
3.74%
24.34
Trailing P/E
148.36
21.20
Forward P/E
96.38
Quality & Moat
18.22%
ROIC
2.53%
36.08%
ROE
2.14%
54.80%
Gross Margin
40.49%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.72
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
0.92
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.48
1.72%
Dividend Yield
2.38%
QCOM: 10Ties: 1VTR: 1
QCOMVTR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VTR
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-2.03B
Δ Market Cap
+$18.74B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VTR
38.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 38.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $81.60
Fair Value: $133.28
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

VTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $82?

+20.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.4%

The market implies +20.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
VTR
49/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VTR
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VTR
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 107.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,364
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VTR
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $197,025
EMBLER MICHAEL J
Director
$197,025
@ $78.81 · 2026-06-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VTR
1
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $77.75M
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$103,915
@ $90.20 · 2026-05-14
ROBERTS CAREY SHEA
General Counsel
$3.02M
@ $85.00 · 2026-02-11
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$848,751
@ $82.23 · 2026-02-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$801,605
@ $77.66 · 2026-02-02
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.31M
@ $77.25 · 2026-01-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$797,475
@ $77.26 · 2026-01-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$831,419
@ $80.55 · 2025-12-01
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$400,205
@ $80.04 · 2025-11-19
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $79.01 · 2025-11-17
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.58M
@ $76.77 · 2025-11-12
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$3,028
@ $75.70 · 2025-11-07
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$372,256
@ $75.05 · 2025-11-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$2.33M
@ $75.19 · 2025-11-06
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$25.08M
@ $74.22 · 2025-11-03
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$15.66M
@ $71.32 · 2025-10-20
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$322,215
@ $70.14 · 2025-10-01
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$724,986
@ $70.24 · 2025-10-01
BULGARELLI PETER J
Officer
$28,419
@ $70.00 · 2025-09-15
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$699,864
@ $67.80 · 2025-09-02
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $68.49 · 2025-08-04
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$695,722
@ $67.40 · 2025-08-01
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$266,960
@ $68.45 · 2025-07-31
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.95M
@ $66.29 · 2025-07-21
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$271,454
@ $66.24 · 2025-07-18
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$287,976
@ $65.82 · 2025-07-18
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.07M
@ $65.60 · 2025-07-16
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$11.00M
@ $65.36 · 2025-07-14
ROBERTS CAREY SHEA
General Counsel
$1.51M
@ $64.23 · 2025-05-30
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.13M
@ $65.22 · 2025-05-27
PROBST ROBERT F.
Chief Financial Officer
$4.50M
@ $64.59 · 2025-05-21
RAKOWICH WALTER C.
Director
$93,026
@ $63.76 · 2025-05-14
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$682,135
@ $66.09 · 2025-05-02
CAFARO DEBRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $71.06 · 2025-04-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VTR
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
VTR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView VTR Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs VTR

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Ventas, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, VTR trades at a 38.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $82), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Ventas, Inc.?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while VTR scores 49/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Ventas, Inc. in financial distress?

VTR's Altman Z-Score of 1.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Ventas, Inc.?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Ventas, Inc.'s 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Ventas, Inc.?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus VTR's 2.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Ventas, Inc.'s?

QCOM's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to VTR's 18/100 (Unsafe). QCOM has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.