Compare StocksQCOM vs UHS

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, QCOM is overvalued at $148, with a DCF intrinsic value of $127 and a margin of safety of -16%. UHS is undervalued at $168, with an intrinsic value of $426 and a margin of safety of 60%. Of the two, UHS has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$147.61
VS
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$168.44

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
UHS
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 46.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Share count has been reduced by 14% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.83 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
UHS

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    UHS
    Valuation
    $10.24B
    Free Cash Flow
    $824.55M
    6.61%
    FCF Yield
    8.09%
    16.87
    Trailing P/E
    6.87
    14.34
    Forward P/E
    6.96
    Quality & Moat
    15.03%
    ROIC
    12.34%
    33.75%
    ROE
    20.95%
    54.23%
    Gross Margin
    44.61%
    0.63
    PEG Ratio
    1.20
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.25
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.67
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.58
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.90
    2.49%
    Dividend Yield
    0.47%
    QCOM: 8Ties: 1UHS: 3
    QCOMUHS

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    UHS

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    $5.06
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $11.96B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$60.46B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    UHS
    $1.05
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.19B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.36B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    84.2% Overvalued
    Price is 84.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $147.61
    Fair Value: $80.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    UHS
    60.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 60.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $168.44
    Fair Value: $425.70
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    QCOM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $148?

    +11.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.5%

    The market implies +11.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    UHS

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $168?

    -1.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +6.7%

    The market implies -1.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    73/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    UHS
    66/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    -3.16
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    UHS
    -2.44
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    UHS
    Insiders 4.8%Institutions 100.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders872
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    UHS
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    3
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $12.57M
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $452,030
    @ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,380
    @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $529,741
    @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $325,854
    @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $330,815
    @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $458,799
    @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $577,620
    @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $2.20M
    @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $2.83M
    @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.28M
    @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $567,702
    @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $522,808
    @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $122,463
    @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $493,610
    @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $537,560
    @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $486,965
    @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $120,808
    @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $465,846
    @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $91,442
    @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $119,900
    @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,262
    @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $523,292
    @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $130,074
    @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $509,397
    @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $3.28M
    @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $463,851
    @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $409,056
    @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
    ROGERS ALEXANDER H
    Officer
    $1.67M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $1.24M
    @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $484,617
    @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
    MARTIN NEIL A
    Officer
    $202,120
    @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
    PALKHIWALA AKASH J
    Chief Operating Officer
    $491,349
    @ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
    THOMPSON JAMES H.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.38M
    @ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
    CHAPLIN ANN C
    General Counsel
    $313,779
    @ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    UHS
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.20M
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $128,099
    @ $190.06 · 2026-03-13
    NIMETZ WARREN J.
    Director
    $852,343
    @ $223.30 · 2025-11-11
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $217,799
    @ $225.70 · 2025-10-29
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $210,053
    @ $191.48 · 2025-05-14
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $179,161
    @ $179.16 · 2025-03-10
    SINGER MARIA RUDERMAN
    Director
    $308,516
    @ $191.15 · 2024-12-11
    SUSSMAN ELLIOT M.D.
    Director
    $375,534
    @ $218.08 · 2024-08-13
    NIMETZ WARREN J.
    Director
    $749,552
    @ $217.64 · 2024-08-12
    CHEN-LANGENMAYR NINA
    Director
    $180,294
    @ $212.11 · 2024-08-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(27/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    UHS
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    QCOM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (27)
    UHS
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View QCOM Full AnalysisView UHS Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs UHS

    Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, UHS trades at a 60.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $426 vs. price $168), compared to QCOM's -15.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $127 vs. $148).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?

    QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while UHS scores 66/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?

    Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) generates a 8.1% free cash flow yield, compared to QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Universal Health Services, Inc.?

    QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus UHS's 12.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Universal Health Services, Inc.'s?

    UHS's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). UHS has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.