Compare StocksQCOM vs TEL

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs TE Connectivity plc (TEL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. TEL is overvalued at $218, with an intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -34%. Of the two, TEL has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
TEL
TE Connectivity plc
$217.64

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TEL
  • TE Connectivity plc has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • TE Connectivity plc scores 81/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
TEL
  • FCF yield of 5.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Insiders have sold $6.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
TEL
Valuation
$12.82B
Free Cash Flow
$3.20B
5.38%
FCF Yield
5.04%
24.34
Trailing P/E
22.23
21.20
Forward P/E
17.21
Quality & Moat
18.22%
ROIC
15.61%
36.08%
ROE
22.72%
54.80%
Gross Margin
36.07%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.00
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.00
1.72%
Dividend Yield
1.37%
QCOM: 9Ties: 1TEL: 2
QCOMTEL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TEL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TEL
$6.55
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.66B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TEL
33.7% Overvalued
Price is 33.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $217.64
Fair Value: $162.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TEL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $218?

+16.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.6%

The market implies +16.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TEL
81/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TEL
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TEL
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.5%Retail & Other 2.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,805
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TEL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TEL
3
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $120.91M
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-06-01
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.02M
@ $215.00 · 2026-05-06
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.10M
@ $223.26 · 2026-04-08
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.09M
@ $222.52 · 2026-03-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$1.53M
@ $233.64 · 2026-02-13
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$2.20M
@ $233.82 · 2026-02-13
SHAFFER REUBEN M
Officer
$333,853
@ $234.28 · 2026-02-13
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$1.37M
@ $222.81 · 2026-02-09
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$2.84M
@ $226.43 · 2025-12-19
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$9.45M
@ $227.07 · 2025-12-19
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$6.20M
@ $247.73 · 2025-11-03
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$20.34M
@ $247.15 · 2025-11-03
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$4.84M
@ $202.99 · 2025-09-02
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$9.60M
@ $209.33 · 2025-07-28
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$403,004
@ $207.20 · 2025-07-28
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$41.15M
@ $208.76 · 2025-07-28
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$10.20M
@ $192.78 · 2025-07-23
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$2.23M
@ $170.00 · 2025-06-26
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.98M
@ $159.03 · 2025-06-02
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$3.32M
@ $162.85 · 2025-05-13
STUCKI AARON KYLE
President
$800,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
SAGAR MALAVIKA
Officer
$500,000
@ $160.00 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$8.49M
@ $159.21 · 2025-05-12
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$5.80M
@ $153.33 · 2025-05-09
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$4.48M
@ $149.39 · 2025-05-02
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$3.67M
@ $146.77 · 2025-03-04
WRIGHT LAURA H
Director
$154,660
@ $154.66 · 2025-02-18
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$587,706
@ $151.16 · 2025-01-27
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$17.79M
@ $154.69 · 2024-11-11
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$6.34M
@ $155.49 · 2024-11-07
OTT ROBERT J
Officer
$2.50M
@ $155.41 · 2024-11-06
KROEGER SHADRAK W
Officer
$1.32M
@ $151.41 · 2024-09-03
JENKINS JOHN S. JR.
General Counsel
$895,048
@ $145.56 · 2024-08-13
MITTS HEATH A
Chief Financial Officer
$9.24M
@ $154.70 · 2024-07-31
OTT ROBERT J
Officer
$450,321
@ $154.59 · 2024-07-31
CURTIN TERRENCE R
Chief Executive Officer
$33.97M
@ $155.45 · 2024-07-29
STUCKI AARON KYLE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $155.00 · 2024-07-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TEL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(54/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
TEL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView TEL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs TEL

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or TE Connectivity plc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TEL trades at a -33.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $163 vs. price $218), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or TE Connectivity plc?

TEL scores 81/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or TE Connectivity plc?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to TE Connectivity plc's 5.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or TE Connectivity plc?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus TEL's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or TE Connectivity plc's?

TEL's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). TEL has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.