Compare StocksQCOM vs TDY

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. TDY is overvalued at $620, with an intrinsic value of $477 and a margin of safety of -30%. Of the two, TDY has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
$619.58

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
TDY
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 39.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.36 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
TDY
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.37 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • Trailing P/E of 31.4x is 25% above the historical average of 25.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
TDY
Valuation
$12.82B
Free Cash Flow
$1.07B
5.38%
FCF Yield
3.74%
24.34
Trailing P/E
31.42
21.20
Forward P/E
23.78
Quality & Moat
18.22%
ROIC
7.10%
36.08%
ROE
9.05%
54.80%
Gross Margin
42.87%
0.91
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
0.18
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.27
1.72%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
QCOM: 10Ties: 1TDY: 1
QCOMTDY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TDY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TDY
$1.86
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.60B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TDY
29.8% Overvalued
Price is 29.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $619.58
Fair Value: $477.21
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TDY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $620?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.5%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TDY
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TDY
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TDY
Insiders 0.9%Institutions 100.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,176
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TDY
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TDY
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.80M
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$2.48M
@ $621.00 · 2026-01-29
BOBB GEORGE C. III
Chief Executive Officer
$3.74M
@ $555.41 · 2025-07-30
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.11M
@ $560.10 · 2025-07-28
LORNE SIMON M
Director
$3.47M
@ $549.64 · 2025-07-25
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$1.92M
@ $520.06 · 2025-03-03
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$367,090
@ $519.96 · 2025-03-03
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$16.15M
@ $512.21 · 2025-02-07
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$2.99M
@ $518.22 · 2025-01-31
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$1.38M
@ $510.03 · 2025-01-29
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
Chief Operating Officer
$3.78M
@ $511.10 · 2025-01-28
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$1.07M
@ $510.50 · 2025-01-27
BOBB GEORGE C. III
President
$3.20M
@ $507.77 · 2025-01-24
BELAK CYNTHIA Y.
Officer
$2.92M
@ $508.34 · 2025-01-24
BLACKWOOD STEPHEN FINIS
Chief Financial Officer
$2.59M
@ $513.62 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MICHAEL T.
Director
$968,456
@ $478.25 · 2024-12-12
CROCKER CHARLES
Director
$946,236
@ $473.12 · 2024-12-09
MEHRABIAN ROBERT
Officer and Director
$24.38M
@ $487.58 · 2024-11-11
VANWEES JASON
Officer
$2.45M
@ $489.42 · 2024-11-08
CIBIK MELANIE SUSAN
General Counsel
$4.64M
@ $490.17 · 2024-11-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TDY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
TDY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView TDY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs TDY

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TDY trades at a -29.8% margin of safety (intrinsic value $477 vs. price $620), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while TDY scores 64/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Teledyne Technologies Incorporated's 3.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus TDY's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.