Compare StocksQCOM vs SNA

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. SNA is fairly valued at $387, with an intrinsic value of $432 and a margin of safety of 10%. Of the two, SNA has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$387.25

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
SNA
  • Snap-on Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Snap-on Incorporated scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
SNA
  • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Trailing P/E of 20.0x is 27% above the historical average of 15.8x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.17 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
SNA
Valuation
$12.82B
Free Cash Flow
$1.05B
5.38%
FCF Yield
5.23%
24.34
Trailing P/E
20.01
21.20
Forward P/E
18.19
Quality & Moat
18.22%
ROIC
13.91%
36.08%
ROE
18.20%
54.80%
Gross Margin
51.62%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.17
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.32
1.72%
Dividend Yield
2.51%
QCOM: 5Ties: 2SNA: 5
QCOMSNA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SNA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SNA
$3.12
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.76B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SNA
10.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $387.25
Fair Value: $432.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

SNA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $387?

+6.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.8%

The market implies +6.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
SNA
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SNA
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SNA
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 98.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,409
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SNA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SNA
5
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51.44M
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
Officer
$1.63M
@ $383.92 · 2026-06-10
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$166,338
@ $389.55 · 2026-06-10
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$504,430
@ $379.27 · 2026-06-04
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.10M
@ $367.19 · 2026-05-14
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$8.79M
@ $375.77 · 2026-05-05
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Investment Officer
$534,075
@ $387.57 · 2026-02-25
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$8.91M
@ $383.36 · 2026-02-23
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.69M
@ $382.05 · 2026-02-19
CHAMBERS TIMOTHY L.
Officer
$3.08M
@ $385.13 · 2026-02-04
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.39M
@ $352.20 · 2025-12-11
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.07M
@ $346.80 · 2025-12-04
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$1.29M
@ $346.62 · 2025-12-04
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.67M
@ $339.15 · 2025-12-02
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
Officer
$1.29M
@ $337.28 · 2025-11-25
JONES NATHAN J
Director
$340,615
@ $340.62 · 2025-11-13
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.59M
@ $327.33 · 2025-08-15
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.39M
@ $320.88 · 2025-08-11
DANIEL KAREN L
Director
$348,716
@ $319.92 · 2025-06-05
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.32M
@ $315.85 · 2025-06-02
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.81M
@ $326.84 · 2025-05-15
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.61M
@ $335.32 · 2025-03-27
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.33M
@ $339.05 · 2025-02-20
SAEZ JESUS MARIA ARREGUI
President
$2.18M
@ $337.81 · 2025-02-10
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $347.62 · 2024-12-18
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$7.73M
@ $354.83 · 2024-12-09
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Technology Officer
$1.27M
@ $362.86 · 2024-12-04
WARD THOMAS J
Officer
$4.24M
@ $333.21 · 2024-10-28
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$1.06M
@ $324.78 · 2024-10-18
BOYD IAIN
Officer
$1.34M
@ $318.46 · 2024-10-18
MILLER RICHARD THOMAS
General Counsel
$986,885
@ $299.42 · 2024-10-15
BOYD IAIN
Officer
$1.81M
@ $298.99 · 2024-10-15
LEMERAND JUNE C
Chief Technology Officer
$336,786
@ $283.97 · 2024-08-26
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$480,429
@ $282.61 · 2024-08-23
PAGLIARI ALDO JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $278.74 · 2024-08-22
PINCHUK NICHOLAS T
Chief Executive Officer
$6.49M
@ $268.95 · 2024-08-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SNA
FearGreed
😏Greed(63/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
SNA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView SNA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs SNA

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Snap-on Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SNA trades at a 10.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $432 vs. price $387), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Snap-on Incorporated?

SNA scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Snap-on Incorporated?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Snap-on Incorporated's 5.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Snap-on Incorporated?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus SNA's 13.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Snap-on Incorporated's?

SNA's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). SNA has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.