Compare StocksQCOM vs ROK

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, QCOM is overvalued at $226, with a DCF intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. ROK is overvalued at $474, with an intrinsic value of $215 and a margin of safety of -120%. Of the two, QCOM has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11
VS
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$473.79

Rewards

QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
ROK
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 25.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
ROK
  • FCF yield of 2.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 49.1x is 38% above the historical average of 35.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
ROK
Valuation
$12.82B
Free Cash Flow
$1.36B
5.38%
FCF Yield
2.58%
24.34
Trailing P/E
49.10
21.20
Forward P/E
32.62
Quality & Moat
18.22%
ROIC
18.89%
36.08%
ROE
27.18%
54.80%
Gross Margin
48.92%
0.91
PEG Ratio
2.03
Balance Sheet Safety
0.20
Net Debt / Equity
1.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.42
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.84
1.72%
Dividend Yield
1.17%
QCOM: 10Ties: 2ROK: 0
QCOMROK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROK
$9.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROK
120.2% Overvalued
Price is 120.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $473.79
Fair Value: $215.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

ROK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $474?

+21.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.6%

The market implies +21.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROK
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROK
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 8.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,920
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROK
11
Sells (3M)
49
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $38.51M
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$173,612
@ $460.51 · 2026-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$99,482
@ $456.34 · 2026-06-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$449,025
@ $426.02 · 2026-05-20
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$1.82M
@ $451.97 · 2026-05-07
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$246,252
@ $447.73 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$269,748
@ $449.58 · 2026-05-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $446.43 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$480,000
@ $400.00 · 2026-04-13
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$78,209
@ $394.99 · 2026-04-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$484,375
@ $387.50 · 2026-04-08
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$107,341
@ $359.00 · 2026-04-02
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$3.56M
@ $398.92 · 2026-03-02
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$5.93M
@ $410.01 · 2026-02-26
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$4.89M
@ $404.27 · 2026-02-25
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$7.04M
@ $404.61 · 2026-02-25
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$485,050
@ $404.21 · 2026-02-25
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$812,599
@ $409.37 · 2026-02-25
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$515,628
@ $405.69 · 2026-02-25
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$77,548
@ $380.14 · 2026-02-17
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$313,600
@ $392.00 · 2026-01-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$46,999
@ $401.70 · 2025-12-10
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$823,435
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$438,542
@ $401.60 · 2025-12-10
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$664,640
@ $401.84 · 2025-12-10
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,792
@ $401.38 · 2025-12-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$828,475
@ $402.37 · 2025-12-10
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$550,861
@ $401.80 · 2025-12-10
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$114,934
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$116,500
@ $401.72 · 2025-12-10
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$388,205
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$184,676
@ $401.47 · 2025-12-10
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$12,087
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$149,476
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$51,981
@ $402.95 · 2025-12-05
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$113,607
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$118,860
@ $402.92 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$1.42M
@ $403.04 · 2025-12-05
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$149,486
@ $402.93 · 2025-12-05
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$24,173
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$27,396
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$56,004
@ $402.91 · 2025-12-05
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$74,127
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$300,030
@ $365.00 · 2025-10-29
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$87,500
@ $350.00 · 2025-09-11
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$35,552
@ $345.17 · 2025-09-08
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$127,181
@ $348.44 · 2025-08-29
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$499,500
@ $348.08 · 2025-08-29
KEANE JAMES P
Director
$1.07M
@ $356.06 · 2025-08-26
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$830,730
@ $350.67 · 2025-07-17
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$171,134
@ $325.35 · 2025-06-11
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$179,796
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$94,310
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$81,583
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$118,454
@ $326.32 · 2025-06-09
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$96,913
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$161,197
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,023
@ $318.15 · 2025-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$141,758
@ $315.02 · 2025-05-29
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$558,038
@ $310.02 · 2025-05-13
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.58M
@ $304.18 · 2025-05-12
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$285,682
@ $304.24 · 2025-05-12
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$760,321
@ $304.13 · 2025-05-12
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$518,651
@ $304.37 · 2025-05-12
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.48M
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$147,504
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$75,500
@ $257.68 · 2025-04-02
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$501,858
@ $286.78 · 2025-03-03
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$71,928
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$351,364
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$248,810
@ $284.03 · 2025-02-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROK
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
ROK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView ROK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs ROK

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Rockwell Automation, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, QCOM trades at a -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $128 vs. price $226), compared to ROK's -120.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $215 vs. $474).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Rockwell Automation, Inc.?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while ROK scores 69/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Rockwell Automation, Inc.?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s 2.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Rockwell Automation, Inc.?

ROK earns 18.9% ROIC versus QCOM's 18.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s?

ROK's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). ROK has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.