Compare Stocks › QCOM vs REGN

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-02, QCOM is overvalued at $165, with a DCF intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -31%. REGN is overvalued at $928, with an intrinsic value of $730 and a margin of safety of -27%. Of the two, REGN has the wider margin of safety.

QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$164.79
VS
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$927.89

Rewards

QCOM
  • ★QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
REGN
  • ★Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 7.56 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -1.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

QCOM
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠14 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
REGN
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 7.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.15 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $3.3M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
QCOM
REGN
Valuation
$10.24B
Free Cash Flow
$3.77B
5.82%
FCF Yield
3.92%
19.07
Trailing P/E
20.51
16.18
Forward P/E
13.73
Quality & Moat
15.03%
ROIC
14.92%
33.75%
ROE
14.95%
54.23%
Gross Margin
46.73%
0.74
PEG Ratio
1.58
Balance Sheet Safety
0.25
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.58
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.17
2.23%
Dividend Yield
0.41%
QCOM: 7Ties: 2REGN: 3
QCOMREGN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

REGN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
REGN
$0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$12.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
QCOM
109.1% Overvalued
Price is 109.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $164.79
Fair Value: $78.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
REGN
27.0% Overvalued
Price is 27.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $927.89
Fair Value: $730.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $165?

+13.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.2%

The market implies +13.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

REGN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $928?

+7.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.0%

The market implies +7.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
REGN
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
REGN
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.5%Retail & Other 16.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,916
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
REGN
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 4.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,986
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
REGN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.35M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$437,647
@ $175.06 · 2026-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$457,129
@ $182.85 · 2026-09-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$408,143
@ $163.26 · 2026-08-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$452,030
@ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
REGN
4
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.65M
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$2.00M
@ $853.56 · 2026-09-03
GUARINI KATHRYN PH.D.
Director
$340,000
@ $850.00 · 2026-09-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$640,000
@ $800.00 · 2026-08-10
GUARINI KATHRYN PH.D.
Director
$320,000
@ $800.00 · 2026-08-10
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$130,030
@ $650.15 · 2026-07-02
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$70,524
@ $705.24 · 2026-05-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,727
@ $777.27 · 2026-04-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$78,550
@ $785.50 · 2026-03-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$1.28M
@ $781.33 · 2026-02-19
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$1.59M
@ $778.52 · 2026-02-09
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,853
@ $778.53 · 2026-02-09
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$1.20M
@ $800.00 · 2026-01-07
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$570,000
@ $750.00 · 2025-11-20
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$280,766
@ $651.43 · 2025-11-07
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$4.25M
@ $654.27 · 2025-10-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
QCOM
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
REGN
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
QCOM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
REGN
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
View QCOM Full AnalysisView REGN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: QCOM vs REGN

Is QUALCOMM Incorporated or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, REGN trades at a -27.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $730 vs. price $928), compared to QCOM's -31.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $165).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

REGN scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s 3.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, QUALCOMM Incorporated or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?▼

QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus REGN's 14.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, QUALCOMM Incorporated's or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s?▼

REGN's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). REGN has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

QCOM vs REGN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io