Compare StocksQ vs V

Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, Q is fairly valued at $131, with a DCF intrinsic value of $133 and a margin of safety of 1%. V is overvalued at $366, with an intrinsic value of $311 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$131.18
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$366.13

Rewards

Q
    V
    • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    Q
    • PEG ratio of 2.17 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    V
    • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Insiders have sold $14.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    Q
    V
    Valuation
    $988.00M
    Free Cash Flow
    $20.40B
    3.60%
    FCF Yield
    2.98%
    42.18
    Trailing P/E
    31.16
    26.76
    Forward P/E
    24.49
    Quality & Moat
    7.44%
    ROIC
    39.37%
    7.48%
    ROE
    61.19%
    46.09%
    Gross Margin
    97.72%
    2.17
    PEG Ratio
    1.66
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.49
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.29
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.54
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.32
    0.24%
    Dividend Yield
    0.73%
    Q: 1Ties: 1V: 10
    QV

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    V

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
    V
    $5.47
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $44.47B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$243.21B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    Q
    6.2% Overvalued
    Price is 6.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $131.18
    Fair Value: $123.53
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    V
    17.6% Overvalued
    Price is 17.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $366.13
    Fair Value: $311.46
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $131?

    +17.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +13.9%

    The market implies +17.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    V

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $366?

    +15.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.9%

    The market implies +15.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    V
    99/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    V
    -2.50
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    Q
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.8%Retail & Other 23.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,559
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    V
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 89.4%Retail & Other 10.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,880
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    V
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    Q
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $970,297
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $59,340
    @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $82,764
    @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    V
    4
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $62.30M
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $729,720
    @ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.61M
    @ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.13M
    @ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
    SUH CHRIS
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.46M
    @ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.70M
    @ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
    CARNEY LLOYD
    Director
    $201,253
    @ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.66M
    @ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.57M
    @ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $699,315
    @ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $7.84M
    @ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $2.08M
    @ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $707,917
    @ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
    CARNEY LLOYD
    Director
    $302,832
    @ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.58M
    @ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.59M
    @ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.65M
    @ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $697,329
    @ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.60M
    @ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
    TANEJA RAJAT
    President
    $18.44M
    @ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $17.10M
    @ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $6.32M
    @ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $5.26M
    @ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.98M
    @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $889,868
    @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.02M
    @ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $13.40M
    @ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $12.88M
    @ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.13M
    @ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
    MAHON TULLIER KELLY
    Officer
    $11.80M
    @ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
    ANDRESKI PETER M
    Officer
    $815,314
    @ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.93M
    @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $874,480
    @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
    TANEJA RAJAT
    Officer
    $11.15M
    @ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.73M
    @ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
    FABARA PAUL D
    Officer
    $668,603
    @ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $741,996
    @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.39M
    @ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.38M
    @ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
    MCINERNEY RYAN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.37M
    @ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
    ROTTENBERG JULIE B
    General Counsel
    $707,300
    @ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
    MAHON TULLIER KELLY
    Officer
    $10.12M
    @ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    Q
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(42/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    V
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(68/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (42)
    V
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
    View Q Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: Q vs V

    Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 1.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $133 vs. price $131), compared to V's -17.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $311 vs. $366).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

    V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

    Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

    Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

    V earns 39.4% ROIC versus Q's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

    V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to Q's 85/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    Q vs V: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io