Compare StocksQ vs V

Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, Q is fairly valued at $117, with a DCF intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 12%. V is overvalued at $370, with an intrinsic value of $316 and a margin of safety of -17%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$116.77
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$369.60

Rewards

Q
    V
    • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    Q
      V
      • FCF yield of 3.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
      • 9 insider sales totaling $44.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      Q
      V
      Valuation
      $772.25M
      Free Cash Flow
      $20.40B
      3.16%
      FCF Yield
      2.96%
      41.70
      Trailing P/E
      31.43
      21.71
      Forward P/E
      24.63
      Quality & Moat
      7.61%
      ROIC
      39.37%
      6.72%
      ROE
      61.19%
      46.22%
      Gross Margin
      97.72%
      1.24
      PEG Ratio
      1.68
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.47
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.29
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.34
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.32
      0.28%
      Dividend Yield
      0.72%
      Q: 3Ties: 1V: 8
      QV

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      V

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
      V
      $5.47
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $44.47B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$243.21B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      Q
      5.0% Margin of Safety
      Price is 5.0% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $116.77
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      V
      16.9% Overvalued
      Price is 16.9% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $369.60
      Fair Value: $316.13
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

      +15.6%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.8%

      The market implies +15.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      V

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $370?

      +15.3%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.0%

      The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      V
      99/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      V
      -2.50
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      V
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 90.2%Retail & Other 9.7%
      No. of Institutional Holders5,988
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      V
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      V
      9
      Sells (3M)
      22
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $87.76M
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $687,691
      @ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.23M
      @ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $773,378
      @ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
      TANEJA RAJAT
      Officer
      $6.65M
      @ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.16M
      @ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
      MAHON TULLIER KELLY
      Officer
      $20.90M
      @ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $729,720
      @ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.61M
      @ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $7.13M
      @ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
      SUH CHRIS
      Chief Financial Officer
      $3.46M
      @ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.70M
      @ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
      CARNEY LLOYD
      Director
      $201,253
      @ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.66M
      @ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $699,315
      @ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.57M
      @ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $2.50M
      @ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
      TANEJA RAJAT
      Officer
      $7.84M
      @ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $707,917
      @ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
      TANEJA RAJAT
      Officer
      $2.08M
      @ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
      CARNEY LLOYD
      Director
      $302,832
      @ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.58M
      @ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.59M
      @ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.65M
      @ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $697,329
      @ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.60M
      @ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.05M
      @ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $4.36M
      @ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $17.10M
      @ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
      TANEJA RAJAT
      President
      $18.44M
      @ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.13M
      @ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $6.32M
      @ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $5.26M
      @ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $889,868
      @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.98M
      @ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.02M
      @ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $13.40M
      @ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $12.88M
      @ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $3.13M
      @ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
      ANDRESKI PETER M
      Officer
      $815,314
      @ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
      MAHON TULLIER KELLY
      Officer
      $11.80M
      @ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $874,480
      @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.93M
      @ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.74M
      @ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
      TANEJA RAJAT
      Officer
      $11.15M
      @ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.73M
      @ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
      FABARA PAUL D
      Officer
      $668,603
      @ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
      ROTTENBERG JULIE B
      General Counsel
      $741,996
      @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
      MCINERNEY RYAN
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.39M
      @ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(37/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      V
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(63/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
      V
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
      View Q Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: Q vs V

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 11.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $132 vs. price $117), compared to V's -16.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $316 vs. $370).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

      V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

      Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

      Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Visa Inc.?

      V earns 39.4% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?

      V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to Q's 85/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

      Q vs V: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io