Compare StocksQ vs UNH

Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, Q is fairly valued at $117, with a DCF intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 11%. UNH is fairly valued at $379, with an intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of 3%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$117.15
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$379.20

Rewards

Q
    UNH
    • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    Q
      UNH
      • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
      • Gross margin of 19.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
      • FCF yield of 7.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      Q
      UNH
      Valuation
      $772.25M
      Free Cash Flow
      $24.27B
      3.15%
      FCF Yield
      7.13%
      41.84
      Trailing P/E
      24.35
      21.78
      Forward P/E
      16.82
      Quality & Moat
      7.61%
      ROIC
      14.16%
      6.72%
      ROE
      14.15%
      46.22%
      Gross Margin
      19.72%
      1.24
      PEG Ratio
      1.04
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.47
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.40
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.34
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      1.57
      0.28%
      Dividend Yield
      2.47%
      Q: 1Ties: 1UNH: 10
      QUNH

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      UNH

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
      UNH
      $-7.37
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $26.63B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-196.16B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      Q
      4.6% Margin of Safety
      Price is 4.6% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $117.15
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      UNH
      2.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 2.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $379.20
      Fair Value: $389.12
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

      +15.7%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.8%

      The market implies +15.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      UNH

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $379?

      +13.2%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +4.5%

      The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      UNH
      73/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      UNH
      -2.45
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      UNH
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 89.7%Retail & Other 10.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,387
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      UNH
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      REX JOHN F
      President
      $5.00M
      @ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
      HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
      Chief Executive Officer
      $25.02M
      @ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
      GIL KRISTEN
      Director
      $1.00M
      @ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
      NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
      Director
      $93,647
      @ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
      FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
      Director
      $491,786
      @ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      UNH
      2
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $944,910
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
      Officer
      $455,910
      @ $390.00 · 2026-08-21
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
      Officer
      $205,000
      @ $410.00 · 2026-08-05
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
      Officer
      $284,000
      @ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
      CONWAY PATRICK HUGH
      Chief Executive Officer
      $179,645
      @ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(37/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      UNH
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(51/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
      UNH
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
      View Q Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: Q vs UNH

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 11.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $132 vs. price $117), compared to UNH's 2.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $389 vs. $379).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

      Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 7.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s 3.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

      UNH earns 14.2% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to UNH's 84/100 (Very Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.