Compare StocksQ vs TXN

Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, Q is fairly valued at $117, with a DCF intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 11%. TXN is undervalued at $258, with an intrinsic value of $365 and a margin of safety of 29%. Of the two, TXN has the wider margin of safety.

Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$117.33
VS
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
$257.84

Rewards

Q
    TXN
    • Texas Instruments Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
    • PEG ratio of 0.94 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

    Risks

    Q
      TXN
      • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
      • FCF yield of 1.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
      • Trailing P/E of 39.2x is 45% above the historical average of 27.1x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      Q
      TXN
      Valuation
      $772.25M
      Free Cash Flow
      $3.55B
      3.15%
      FCF Yield
      1.51%
      41.90
      Trailing P/E
      39.25
      21.82
      Forward P/E
      24.22
      Quality & Moat
      7.61%
      ROIC
      20.41%
      6.72%
      ROE
      35.18%
      46.22%
      Gross Margin
      58.33%
      1.21
      PEG Ratio
      0.94
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.47
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.39
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.34
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.74
      0.28%
      Dividend Yield
      2.18%
      Q: 2Ties: 1TXN: 9
      QTXN

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      TXN

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
      TXN
      $3.91
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $1.96B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$7.67B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      Q
      4.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 4.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $117.33
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      TXN
      18.4% Margin of Safety
      Price is 18.4% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $257.84
      Fair Value: $315.99
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $117?

      +15.7%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.9%

      The market implies +15.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      TXN

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $258?

      +19.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +24.5%

      The market implies +19.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +24.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      TXN
      48/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      TXN
      -2.67
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      TXN
      Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.7%Retail & Other 8.1%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,671
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      TXN
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      TXN
      1
      Sells (3M)
      28
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $114.87M
      ABRAHAM TSEDENIYA
      Officer
      $1.85M
      @ $264.63 · 2026-08-27
      CRAIGHEAD MARTIN S
      Director
      $3.20M
      @ $320.43 · 2026-05-28
      LIZARDI RAFAEL R
      Chief Financial Officer
      $14.71M
      @ $308.10 · 2026-05-14
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $1.55M
      @ $309.13 · 2026-05-14
      COX CARRIE SMITH
      Director
      $2.71M
      @ $306.41 · 2026-05-13
      LEONARD SHANON J
      Officer
      $1.47M
      @ $295.22 · 2026-05-11
      ILAN HAVIV
      Chief Executive Officer
      $5.61M
      @ $280.32 · 2026-05-04
      KNECHT JULIE C.
      Officer
      $2.77M
      @ $278.70 · 2026-05-01
      GARY MARK
      Officer
      $3.82M
      @ $279.25 · 2026-04-30
      ROBERTS MARK T
      Officer
      $7.87M
      @ $280.34 · 2026-04-30
      YUNUS MOHAMMAD
      Officer
      $13.82M
      @ $270.44 · 2026-04-29
      KANE KATHARINE
      General Counsel
      $1.66M
      @ $270.41 · 2026-04-27
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $982,359
      @ $268.40 · 2026-04-27
      RON AMICHAI
      Officer
      $5.00M
      @ $272.43 · 2026-04-24
      LIZARDI RAFAEL R
      Chief Financial Officer
      $11.12M
      @ $274.23 · 2026-04-24
      WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
      Officer
      $998,771
      @ $275.52 · 2026-04-24
      LEONARD SHANON J
      Officer
      $5.06M
      @ $277.95 · 2026-04-24
      PATSLEY PAMELA H
      Director
      $1.19M
      @ $276.11 · 2026-04-24
      BLUEDORN TODD M
      Director
      $1.18M
      @ $274.25 · 2026-04-24
      KOZANIAN HAGOP H
      Officer
      $1.55M
      @ $225.95 · 2026-02-17
      LIZARDI RAFAEL R
      Chief Financial Officer
      $15.88M
      @ $221.73 · 2026-02-11
      GARY MARK
      Officer
      $5.24M
      @ $226.00 · 2026-02-11
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $1.50M
      @ $230.79 · 2026-02-11
      ROBERTS MARK T
      Officer
      $986,604
      @ $221.16 · 2026-02-09
      BLINN MARK A
      Director
      $696,647
      @ $221.58 · 2026-02-05
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $670,387
      @ $223.46 · 2026-02-05
      KIRK RONALD
      Director
      $1.62M
      @ $162.33 · 2025-11-24
      WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
      Officer
      $164,306
      @ $164.31 · 2025-11-13
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $308,030
      @ $205.35 · 2025-08-25
      TEMPLETON RICHARD K
      Chairman of the Board
      $19.85M
      @ $195.41 · 2025-02-28
      TEMPLETON RICHARD K
      Chairman of the Board
      $38.65M
      @ $199.20 · 2025-02-26
      TEMPLETON RICHARD K
      Chairman of the Board
      $39.32M
      @ $202.70 · 2025-02-24
      CLARK JANET F
      Director
      $1.23M
      @ $203.62 · 2025-02-24
      BLINN MARK A
      Director
      $1.17M
      @ $189.89 · 2025-02-19
      LEONARD SHANON J
      Officer
      $401,241
      @ $186.62 · 2025-02-18
      BLINN MARK A
      Director
      $106,617
      @ $180.71 · 2025-02-04
      KIRK RONALD
      Director
      $2.14M
      @ $203.33 · 2024-11-25
      ILAN HAVIV
      Chief Executive Officer
      $2.88M
      @ $219.30 · 2024-11-08
      GARY MARK
      Officer
      $3.49M
      @ $219.82 · 2024-11-08
      LIZARDI RAFAEL R
      Chief Financial Officer
      $10.19M
      @ $217.16 · 2024-11-07
      YUNUS MOHAMMAD
      Officer
      $1.81M
      @ $216.94 · 2024-11-07
      BAHAI AHMAD
      Officer
      $472,514
      @ $217.25 · 2024-11-07
      GARY MARK
      Officer
      $940,296
      @ $214.83 · 2024-11-06
      ILAN HAVIV
      Chief Executive Officer
      $5.29M
      @ $211.50 · 2024-11-06
      WITZSCHE CHRISTINE
      Officer
      $27,941
      @ $211.67 · 2024-11-06
      SANCHEZ ROBERT E
      Director
      $2.09M
      @ $208.80 · 2024-10-25
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(37/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      TXN
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(49/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
      TXN
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
      View Q Full AnalysisView TXN Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: Q vs TXN

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, TXN trades at a 29.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $365 vs. price $258), compared to Q's 11.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $132 vs. $117).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

      TXN scores 48/100 (Narrow moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

      Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TXN scores 8.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

      Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated's 1.5%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or Texas Instruments Incorporated?

      TXN earns 20.4% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s or Texas Instruments Incorporated's?

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to TXN's 34/100 (Unsafe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.