Compare StocksQ vs QCOM

Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, Q is fairly valued at $118, with a DCF intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 10%. QCOM is overvalued at $189, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -51%. Of the two, Q has the wider margin of safety.

Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$118.37
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$189.09

Rewards

Q
    QCOM
    • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    Q
      QCOM
      • FCF yield of 5.1% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
      • 14 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      Q
      QCOM
      Valuation
      $772.25M
      Free Cash Flow
      $10.24B
      3.12%
      FCF Yield
      5.07%
      42.28
      Trailing P/E
      21.64
      22.01
      Forward P/E
      18.53
      Quality & Moat
      7.61%
      ROIC
      15.03%
      6.72%
      ROE
      33.75%
      46.22%
      Gross Margin
      54.23%
      1.24
      PEG Ratio
      0.82
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.47
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.25
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.34
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.58
      0.28%
      Dividend Yield
      1.99%
      Q: 0Ties: 1QCOM: 11
      QQCOM

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      QCOM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.
      QCOM
      $5.06
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $11.96B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$60.46B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      Q
      3.6% Margin of Safety
      Price is 3.6% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $118.37
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      QCOM
      140.0% Overvalued
      Price is 140.0% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $189.09
      Fair Value: $78.78
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $118?

      +15.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +16.0%

      The market implies +15.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      QCOM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $189?

      +15.3%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +8.0%

      The market implies +15.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      QCOM
      73/100
      Wide Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      QCOM
      -3.16
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      QCOM
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.0%Retail & Other 16.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,923
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      QCOM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      No open market insider purchases found.
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      QCOM
      3
      Sells (3M)
      14
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $12.29M
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $457,129
      @ $182.85 · 2026-09-11
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $408,143
      @ $163.26 · 2026-08-12
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $452,030
      @ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $493,380
      @ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $529,741
      @ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $325,854
      @ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $330,815
      @ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $458,799
      @ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $577,620
      @ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $2.20M
      @ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $1.28M
      @ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $2.83M
      @ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $567,702
      @ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $1.38M
      @ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $522,808
      @ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $122,463
      @ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $493,610
      @ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $537,560
      @ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $486,965
      @ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $120,808
      @ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $465,846
      @ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $91,442
      @ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $119,900
      @ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $235,262
      @ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $523,292
      @ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $130,074
      @ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $509,397
      @ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $3.28M
      @ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $463,851
      @ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $409,056
      @ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
      CHAPLIN ANN C
      General Counsel
      $1.24M
      @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
      ROGERS ALEXANDER H
      Officer
      $1.67M
      @ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
      PALKHIWALA AKASH J
      Chief Operating Officer
      $484,617
      @ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
      MARTIN NEIL A
      Officer
      $202,120
      @ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(38/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      QCOM
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(53/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
      QCOM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
      View Q Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: Q vs QCOM

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, Q trades at a 10.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $132 vs. price $118), compared to QCOM's -50.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $189).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

      QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

      Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. QCOM scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

      QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Qnity Electronics, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

      QCOM earns 15.0% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

      Q vs QCOM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io