Compare StocksPRU vs UNH

Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, PRU is undervalued at $107, with a DCF intrinsic value of $149 and a margin of safety of 28%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, PRU has the wider margin of safety.

PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$106.53
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

PRU
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $18.55 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 28.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 11.0x is 22% below the historical average of 14.1x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

PRU
  • Prudential Financial, Inc. scores only 15/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.17 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PRU
UNH
Valuation
$10.38B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
28.05%
FCF Yield
4.86%
10.96
Trailing P/E
30.17
7.33
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
2.61%
ROIC
15.60%
10.71%
ROE
12.18%
28.96%
Gross Margin
18.80%
1.19
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.48
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.30
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
5.13%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
PRU: 6Ties: 1UNH: 5
PRUUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PRU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PRU
$0.92
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$3.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.88B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PRU
28.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 28.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $106.53
Fair Value: $148.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PRU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

+3.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -11.5%

The market implies +3.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -11.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PRU
15/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PRU
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PRU
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 64.5%Retail & Other 35.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,783
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PRU
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $168,840
STODDARD THOMAS D
Director
$25,742
@ $102.97 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Director
$42,128
@ $105.32 · 2026-02-11
CHAPPUIS JACQUES P
Officer
$100,970
@ $100.97 · 2026-02-06
DI SIBIO CARMINE
Director
$22,208
@ $111.04 · 2025-02-20
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$42,364
@ $116.38 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PRU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.64M
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$1.40M
@ $103.25 · 2026-05-14
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$762,215
@ $116.28 · 2025-12-11
SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
Officer
$861,520
@ $107.69 · 2025-12-02
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chairman of the Board
$5.17M
@ $107.39 · 2025-11-10
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$438,600
@ $109.65 · 2025-08-29
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$635,880
@ $105.98 · 2025-03-12
TODMAN MICHAEL A
Director
$333,291
@ $112.98 · 2025-02-07
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chief Executive Officer
$23.45M
@ $126.29 · 2024-11-07
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$3.19M
@ $124.10 · 2024-11-07
FALZON ROBERT M
Officer
$6.76M
@ $128.26 · 2024-11-06
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$133,167
@ $119.97 · 2024-09-03
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$322,028
@ $113.43 · 2024-08-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PRU
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PRU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View PRU Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PRU vs UNH

Is Prudential Financial, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PRU trades at a 28.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $149 vs. price $107), compared to UNH's -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $376 vs. $401).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Prudential Financial, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while PRU scores 15/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Prudential Financial, Inc. in financial distress?

PRU's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. UNH scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Prudential Financial, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) generates a 28.1% free cash flow yield, compared to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's 4.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Prudential Financial, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 15.6% ROIC versus PRU's 2.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Prudential Financial, Inc.'s or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated's?

UNH's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PRU's 84/100 (Very Safe). UNH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.