Compare StocksPODD vs UNH

Insulet Corporation (PODD) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)

PODD
Insulet Corporation
$175.04
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$368.78

Rewards

PODD
  • Gross margin of 71.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.09 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 50.3x is 96% below the historical average of 1346.7x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
UNH
  • Dividend yield of 2.40% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.

Risks

PODD
  • FCF yield of 2.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • PEG ratio of 12.90 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 7.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PODD
UNH
Valuation
$349.90M
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
2.89%
FCF Yield
5.28%
50.30
Trailing P/E
27.85
21.69
Forward P/E
17.77
Quality & Moat
15.86%
ROIC
15.60%
16.31%
ROE
11.45%
71.63%
Gross Margin
18.80%
12.90
PEG Ratio
39.79
Balance Sheet Safety
0.66
Debt / Equity
0.74
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.51
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
N/A
Dividend Yield
2.40%
PODD: 5Ties: 2UNH: 4
PODDUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PODD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PODD
$-0.52
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$871.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-455.5M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PODD
23.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 23.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $175.04
Fair Value: $227.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
9.6% Overvalued
Price is 9.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.78
Fair Value: $336.33
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PODD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $175?

+20.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.5%

The market implies +20.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +15.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $369?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.7%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PODD
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UNH
64/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PODD
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PODD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 105.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,190
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.8%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 14.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,077
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PODD
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $799,731
MINOGUE MICHAEL R
Director
$499,847
@ $246.23 · 2026-02-25
STONESIFER TIMOTHY C
Director
$299,884
@ $311.73 · 2025-12-05
CHADWICK ANA MARIA
Chief Financial Officer
$20,600
@ $206.00 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.61M
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PODD
0
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.44M
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$542,510
@ $293.09 · 2025-12-15
SINGH PREM
Officer
$238,726
@ $347.49 · 2025-09-08
COUSIN LAETITIA
Officer
$278,002
@ $348.81 · 2025-09-08
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.42M
@ $332.23 · 2025-08-21
SINGH PREM
Officer
$429,760
@ $320.00 · 2025-08-07
MANEA DANIEL
Officer
$390,065
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
SINGH PREM
Officer
$698,216
@ $300.05 · 2025-06-13
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$147,056
@ $305.73 · 2025-06-09
KAPPLES JOHN W.
General Counsel
$1.68M
@ $318.47 · 2025-05-14
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$960,320
@ $320.00 · 2025-05-13
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.66M
@ $317.54 · 2025-05-13
FREDERICK WAYNE A.I.
Director
$501,875
@ $275.00 · 2025-03-25
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$3.47M
@ $280.00 · 2025-01-21
BENJAMIN ERIC
Officer
$1.17M
@ $267.60 · 2024-12-16
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$252,192
@ $275.62 · 2024-12-10
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$139,598
@ $274.80 · 2024-11-12
HOPFIELD JESSICA
Director
$1.72M
@ $225.26 · 2024-09-11
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$1.13M
@ $225.84 · 2024-09-10
BUDDEN LAUREN
Officer
$333,443
@ $221.41 · 2024-09-09
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$305,463
@ $220.87 · 2024-09-09
SINGH PREM
Officer
$368,940
@ $202.27 · 2024-08-30
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$281,561
@ $203.00 · 2024-08-28
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$299,940
@ $199.96 · 2024-06-14
FIELD MARK N
Chief Technology Officer
$405,806
@ $190.43 · 2024-06-10
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$1.33M
@ $190.51 · 2024-06-10
BORIO LUCIANA
Director
$65,729
@ $182.58 · 2024-06-04
SCANNELL TIMOTHY J.
Director
$596,970
@ $180.90 · 2024-05-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $463,645
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PODD
FearGreed
😨Fear(24/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PODD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (24)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
View PODD Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis
PODD vs UNH: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io