Compare StocksPLTR vs UNH

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, PLTR is overvalued at $128, with a DCF intrinsic value of $55 and a margin of safety of -135%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
$128.47
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

PLTR
  • Gross margin of 84.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 125.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.67 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

PLTR
  • Share count has increased by 14% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 2 out of 2 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • FCF yield of 0.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PLTR
UNH
Valuation
$1.75B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
0.57%
FCF Yield
4.86%
144.35
Trailing P/E
30.17
61.75
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
21.73%
ROIC
15.60%
32.59%
ROE
12.18%
84.07%
Gross Margin
18.80%
1.91
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-3.87
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
PLTR: 5Ties: 1UNH: 6
PLTRUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PLTR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PLTR
$179.17
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$411.56B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PLTR
134.7% Overvalued
Price is 134.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $128.47
Fair Value: $54.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PLTR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $128?

+38.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +37.7%

The market implies +38.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +37.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PLTR
38/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PLTR
-1.84
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PLTR
Insiders 3.5%Institutions 62.4%Retail & Other 34.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,735
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PLTR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Former
$1.16M
@ $116.14 · 2025-05-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PLTR
9
Sells (3M)
50
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $707.82M
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$190,753
@ $128.80 · 2026-06-11
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$505,730
@ $154.89 · 2026-06-01
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$346,954
@ $136.49 · 2026-05-22
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.67M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$54.11M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Executive Officer
$22.52M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.52M
@ $136.04 · 2026-05-20
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.14M
@ $134.04 · 2026-05-15
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.23M
@ $139.41 · 2026-04-15
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.44M
@ $152.41 · 2026-03-16
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$520,601
@ $132.27 · 2026-02-24
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.33M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.67M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$65.96M
@ $133.78 · 2026-02-20
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$22.47M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.74M
@ $133.72 · 2026-02-20
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$60,456
@ $151.14 · 2026-02-02
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.99M
@ $149.65 · 2026-02-02
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$616,590
@ $181.35 · 2026-01-02
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$2.18M
@ $181.35 · 2026-01-02
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.46M
@ $172.98 · 2026-01-02
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$1.67M
@ $185.91 · 2025-12-12
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.34M
@ $167.19 · 2025-12-01
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$631,898
@ $161.32 · 2025-11-24
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$9.12M
@ $162.63 · 2025-11-24
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.86M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$66.04M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$27.55M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$56.73M
@ $163.12 · 2025-11-21
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$4.09M
@ $204.54 · 2025-11-03
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$149,112
@ $186.39 · 2025-10-03
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.68M
@ $184.01 · 2025-10-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$5.71M
@ $158.35 · 2025-09-05
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$12.51M
@ $154.47 · 2025-09-02
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.13M
@ $156.42 · 2025-09-02
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$440,071
@ $157.00 · 2025-08-29
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$30.99M
@ $154.29 · 2025-08-22
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$362,700
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$2.71M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$3.10M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$62.74M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$53.97M
@ $153.36 · 2025-08-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$56.70M
@ $151.20 · 2025-08-20
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$5.25M
@ $175.00 · 2025-08-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$3.09M
@ $154.73 · 2025-08-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$5.00M
@ $150.00 · 2025-07-15
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$111,688
@ $139.61 · 2025-07-09
WOERSCHING ERIC H
Director
$1.34M
@ $130.95 · 2025-07-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.51M
@ $135.31 · 2025-07-01
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.62M
@ $131.06 · 2025-07-01
SANKAR SHYAM
Officer
$53.49M
@ $132.08 · 2025-06-10
WOERSCHING ERIC H
Director
$2.20M
@ $129.29 · 2025-06-09
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.51M
@ $125.38 · 2025-06-06
BUCKLEY JEFFREY JOHANSING
Officer
$239,689
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.32M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$4.98M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$50.39M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Officer
$21.17M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$43.47M
@ $126.35 · 2025-05-21
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$2.37M
@ $118.58 · 2025-05-01
STAT LAUREN ELAINA FRIEDMAN
Director
$65,000
@ $81.25 · 2025-04-03
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.68M
@ $83.83 · 2025-04-01
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$8.13M
@ $82.80 · 2025-03-31
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$26.99M
@ $87.07 · 2025-03-17
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$310.25M
@ $82.73 · 2025-03-14
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$587,010
@ $86.63 · 2025-03-05
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.74M
@ $87.19 · 2025-03-03
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$21.42M
@ $101.50 · 2025-02-24
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Officer
$2.31M
@ $103.01 · 2025-02-21
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$44.56M
@ $103.01 · 2025-02-21
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$69.27M
@ $102.62 · 2025-02-21
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$38.43M
@ $102.47 · 2025-02-20
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $115.96 · 2025-02-11
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$415,318
@ $103.83 · 2025-02-04
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.63M
@ $81.46 · 2025-02-03
SCHIFF ALEXANDRA W
Director
$286,540
@ $71.64 · 2025-01-07
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$7.02M
@ $72.96 · 2025-01-02
TAYLOR RYAN DOUGLAS
Officer
$36.05M
@ $74.48 · 2025-01-02
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.49M
@ $74.51 · 2025-01-02
COHEN STEPHEN ANDREW
President
$95.84M
@ $72.82 · 2024-12-13
GLAZER DAVID ALAN
Chief Financial Officer
$23.10M
@ $73.30 · 2024-12-12
PLANISHEK HEATHER A
Officer
$963,826
@ $69.38 · 2024-12-04
SANKAR SHYAM
Chief Technology Officer
$369.91M
@ $70.06 · 2024-12-03
MOORE ALEXANDER D
Director
$1.33M
@ $66.72 · 2024-12-02
KARP ALEXANDER C.
Chief Executive Officer
$157.86M
@ $62.96 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PLTR
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PLTR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View PLTR Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PLTR vs UNH

Is Palantir Technologies Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to PLTR's -134.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $55 vs. $128).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Palantir Technologies Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while PLTR scores 38/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PLTR scores 182.0 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Palantir Technologies Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Palantir Technologies Inc.'s 0.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Palantir Technologies Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

PLTR earns 21.7% ROIC versus UNH's 15.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.