Compare StocksPH vs QCOM

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, PH is overvalued at $919, with a DCF intrinsic value of $779 and a margin of safety of -18%. QCOM is overvalued at $185, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -47%. Of the two, PH has the wider margin of safety.

PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$918.75
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$184.84

Rewards

PH
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

PH
  • PEG ratio of 3.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $18.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 14 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PH
QCOM
Valuation
$3.90B
Free Cash Flow
$10.24B
3.37%
FCF Yield
5.19%
32.26
Trailing P/E
21.15
23.46
Forward P/E
18.11
Quality & Moat
16.50%
ROIC
15.03%
25.08%
ROE
33.75%
37.55%
Gross Margin
54.23%
3.11
PEG Ratio
0.82
Balance Sheet Safety
0.53
Net Debt / Equity
0.25
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.45
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.58
0.87%
Dividend Yield
1.99%
PH: 1Ties: 1QCOM: 10
PHQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PH
$7.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PH
17.9% Overvalued
Price is 17.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $918.75
Fair Value: $779.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
134.6% Overvalued
Price is 134.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.84
Fair Value: $78.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $919?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $185?

+15.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.7%

The market implies +15.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PH
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PH
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,560
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 83.0%Retail & Other 16.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,923
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PH
10
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.75M
THOMPSON LAURA K
Director
$153,432
@ $958.95 · 2026-09-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$626,363
@ $1040.47 · 2026-08-26
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-17
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$4.73M
@ $1057.42 · 2026-08-14
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.64M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$738,521
@ $1055.03 · 2026-08-14
REIDY JAY
Officer
$316,731
@ $1055.77 · 2026-08-14
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$664,569
@ $1053.20 · 2026-08-14
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$5.81M
@ $1057.57 · 2026-08-14
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.59M
@ $1058.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.13M
@ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$414,777
@ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.33M
@ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.83M
@ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$818,889
@ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.07M
@ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$4.66M
@ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.25M
@ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$535,766
@ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.38M
@ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$2.24M
@ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$1.02M
@ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$3.03M
@ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.23M
@ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
REIDY JAY
Officer
$337,675
@ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.13M
@ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.47M
@ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$817,477
@ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$589,162
@ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$826,524
@ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$421,510
@ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$202,506
@ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$3.20M
@ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
REIDY JAY
Officer
$335,783
@ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
REIDY JAY
Officer
$93,056
@ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
CZAJA MARK T.
Chief Technology Officer
$266,948
@ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
PAREL DINU JOHN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$2.76M
@ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.46M
@ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.79M
@ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.08M
@ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$3.43M
@ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$825,981
@ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$118,773
@ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.71M
@ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.29M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$457,129
@ $182.85 · 2026-09-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$408,143
@ $163.26 · 2026-08-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$452,030
@ $180.81 · 2026-07-14
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View PH Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PH vs QCOM

Is Parker-Hannifin Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PH trades at a -17.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $779 vs. price $919), compared to QCOM's -47.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $185).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Parker-Hannifin Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

PH scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Parker-Hannifin Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) generates a 5.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Parker-Hannifin Corporation or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

PH earns 16.5% ROIC versus QCOM's 15.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Parker-Hannifin Corporation's or QUALCOMM Incorporated's?

PH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to QCOM's 84/100 (Very Safe). PH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.