Compare StocksNEE vs PG

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, NEE is overvalued at $87, with a DCF intrinsic value of $27 and a margin of safety of -224%. PG is overvalued at $150, with an intrinsic value of $100 and a margin of safety of -50%. Of the two, PG has the wider margin of safety.

NEE
NextEra Energy, Inc.
$86.75
VS
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$150.38

Rewards

NEE
  • Gross margin of 61.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PG
  • The Procter & Gamble Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • The Procter & Gamble Company scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

NEE
  • NextEra Energy, Inc. scores only 24/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • High leverage (1.54x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 7.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
PG
  • PEG ratio of 4.28 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 28 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NEE
PG
Valuation
$-18.45B
Free Cash Flow
$12.73B
-10.20%
FCF Yield
3.64%
22.02
Trailing P/E
21.95
19.71
Forward P/E
21.19
Quality & Moat
3.88%
ROIC
17.21%
10.32%
ROE
31.11%
61.40%
Gross Margin
50.98%
1.90
PEG Ratio
4.28
Balance Sheet Safety
1.54
Net Debt / Equity
0.45
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
7.23
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.99
2.89%
Dividend Yield
2.81%
NEE: 3Ties: 3PG: 6
NEEPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NEE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NEE
$0.13
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$8.39B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.11B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PG
$-1.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.32B
Δ Market Cap
$-27.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NEE
224.0% Overvalued
Price is 224.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $86.75
Fair Value: $26.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PG
50.0% Overvalued
Price is 50.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $150.38
Fair Value: $100.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NEE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $150?

+9.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.0%

The market implies +9.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NEE
24/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PG
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NEE
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PG
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NEE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.0%Retail & Other 12.9%
No. of Institutional Holders3,865
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.9%Retail & Other 28.0%
No. of Institutional Holders5,034
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NEE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NEE
0
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $33.58M
DAGGS NICOLE J
Officer
$458,862
@ $93.00 · 2026-03-13
CREWS TERRELL KIRK II
Officer
$1.78M
@ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
MAY JAMES MICHAEL
Officer and Treasurer
$646,423
@ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
LEMASNEY MARK
Officer
$347,088
@ $90.27 · 2026-03-09
REAGAN RONALD R
Officer
$482,505
@ $95.00 · 2026-02-17
KETCHUM JOHN W.
Chief Executive Officer
$8.90M
@ $89.34 · 2026-02-09
SIEVING CHARLES E
Officer
$2.70M
@ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
REAGAN RONALD R
Officer
$1.68M
@ $90.00 · 2026-02-04
REAGAN RONALD R
Officer
$920,210
@ $85.00 · 2026-01-22
REAGAN RONALD R
Officer
$985,481
@ $81.25 · 2025-12-11
PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
Director
$12.18M
@ $83.91 · 2025-11-17
SIEVING CHARLES E
Officer
$906,880
@ $80.00 · 2025-10-03
LEMASNEY MARK
Officer
$62,943
@ $77.90 · 2025-10-01
LEMASNEY MARK
Officer
$63,365
@ $74.90 · 2025-09-25
LEMASNEY MARK
Officer
$60,827
@ $71.90 · 2025-09-12
DUNNE MICHAEL
Chief Financial Officer
$707,900
@ $70.79 · 2025-09-08
COFFEY ROBERT
Officer
$538,800
@ $71.84 · 2025-07-28
MAY JAMES MICHAEL
Officer and Treasurer
$168,718
@ $77.50 · 2025-07-22
SIEVING CHARLES E
Officer
$1.35M
@ $75.00 · 2025-05-16
SIEVING CHARLES E
Officer
$1.66M
@ $70.00 · 2025-05-09
MAY JAMES MICHAEL
Officer
$162,258
@ $68.09 · 2025-02-18
DAGGS NICOLE J
Officer
$302,809
@ $75.57 · 2024-11-12
SIEVING CHARLES E
Officer
$3.19M
@ $85.00 · 2024-09-16
PIMENTEL ARMANDO JR.
Officer of Subsidiary Company
$7.95M
@ $80.00 · 2024-08-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PG
0
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $78.99M
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$917,199
@ $165.29 · 2026-02-27
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$288,454
@ $159.45 · 2026-02-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$2.46M
@ $162.28 · 2026-02-13
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$5.86M
@ $162.33 · 2026-02-12
MOELLER JON R
Officer and Director
$28.12M
@ $162.29 · 2026-02-12
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$2.06M
@ $160.31 · 2026-02-11
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.26M
@ $158.00 · 2026-02-04
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$14.50M
@ $151.15 · 2026-01-23
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$108,438
@ $149.57 · 2025-10-30
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$366,574
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$74,594
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$647,289
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$491,252
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$606,796
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$538,139
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.78M
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$156,835
@ $156.84 · 2025-08-29
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$969,908
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$95,308
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.83M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$50,170
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.35M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.43M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$2.05M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.31M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$1.55M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$1.67M
@ $158.67 · 2025-05-05
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$161,384
@ $161.38 · 2025-04-29
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$6.08M
@ $173.68 · 2025-02-28
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$3.09M
@ $171.66 · 2025-02-25
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$14.82M
@ $163.84 · 2025-01-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NEE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NEE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
PG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View NEE Full AnalysisView PG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NEE vs PG

Is NextEra Energy, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PG trades at a -50.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $100 vs. price $150), compared to NEE's -224.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $27 vs. $87).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, NextEra Energy, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while NEE scores 24/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is NextEra Energy, Inc. in financial distress?

NEE's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PG scores 5.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, NextEra Energy, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) generates a 3.6% free cash flow yield, compared to NextEra Energy, Inc.'s -10.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NextEra Energy, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG earns 17.2% ROIC versus NEE's 3.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, NextEra Energy, Inc.'s or The Procter & Gamble Company's?

PG's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to NEE's 54/100 (Borderline). PG has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

NEE vs PG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io