Compare StocksHON vs PG

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, HON is undervalued at $208, with a DCF intrinsic value of $614 and a margin of safety of 66%. PG is overvalued at $147, with an intrinsic value of $123 and a margin of safety of -19%. Of the two, HON has the wider margin of safety.

HON
Honeywell International Inc.
$207.66
VS
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$147.02

Rewards

HON
  • Honeywell International Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Honeywell International Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
PG
  • The Procter & Gamble Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • The Procter & Gamble Company scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

HON
  • PEG ratio of 3.29 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $4.2M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
PG
  • PEG ratio of 3.74 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 12 insider sales totaling $5.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
HON
PG
Valuation
$5.42B
Free Cash Flow
$13.28B
8.24%
FCF Yield
3.89%
7.98
Trailing P/E
22.21
20.87
Forward P/E
19.87
Quality & Moat
11.31%
ROIC
17.00%
46.58%
ROE
30.29%
36.51%
Gross Margin
50.87%
3.29
PEG Ratio
3.74
Balance Sheet Safety
1.37
Net Debt / Equity
0.46
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.01
1.35%
Dividend Yield
2.96%
HON: 4Ties: 2PG: 6
HONPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
HON

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
HON
$-0.78
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$7.36B
Δ Market Cap
$-5.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PG
$-0.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.48B
Δ Market Cap
$-4.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
HON
66.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 66.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $207.66
Fair Value: $613.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PG
19.2% Overvalued
Price is 19.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.02
Fair Value: $123.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
HON

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $208?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.4%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $147?

+9.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.1%

The market implies +9.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
HON
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PG
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
HON
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PG
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
HON
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.5%Retail & Other 15.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,783
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.8%Retail & Other 28.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,055
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
HON
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
HON
2
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.66M
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$77,569
@ $245.47 · 2026-08-03
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$4.15M
@ $243.77 · 2026-07-27
CURRIER JAMES E
Officer
$547,725
@ $243.65 · 2026-03-02
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$211,877
@ $242.70 · 2026-03-02
LIEBLEIN GRACE D
Director
$1.43M
@ $243.73 · 2026-02-23
DAVIS D. SCOTT
Director
$568,080
@ $240.00 · 2026-02-19
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$1.26M
@ $239.00 · 2026-02-06
MAILLOUX ROBERT D
Officer
$2.42M
@ $229.00 · 2026-01-30
BOLDEA LUCIAN
Officer
$9.34M
@ $221.58 · 2025-08-27
WEST KENNETH J
Officer
$752,026
@ $218.10 · 2025-08-01
MADDEN ANNE T
General Counsel
$6.00M
@ $207.89 · 2025-02-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PG
12
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.52M
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$52,141
@ $145.24 · 2026-08-24
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$491,274
@ $143.02 · 2026-08-21
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$290,312
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
BHARUCHA FREDDY P
Officer
$35,372
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
GAMA PAUL
Officer
$488,311
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
ABD EL HAK HESHAM
Officer
$278,377
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$22,431
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$776,754
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Executive Officer
$888,047
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$1.24M
@ $144.00 · 2026-08-18
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$917,199
@ $165.29 · 2026-02-27
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$288,454
@ $159.45 · 2026-02-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$2.46M
@ $162.28 · 2026-02-13
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$5.86M
@ $162.33 · 2026-02-12
MOELLER JON R
Officer and Director
$28.12M
@ $162.29 · 2026-02-12
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$2.06M
@ $160.31 · 2026-02-11
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.26M
@ $158.00 · 2026-02-04
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$14.50M
@ $151.15 · 2026-01-23
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$108,438
@ $149.57 · 2025-10-30
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$366,574
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$74,594
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$647,289
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$491,252
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$606,796
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$538,139
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.78M
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$156,835
@ $156.84 · 2025-08-29
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$95,308
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.43M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$50,170
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.83M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.35M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$969,908
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$2.05M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$1.55M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.31M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$1.67M
@ $158.67 · 2025-05-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
HON
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
HON
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
PG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
View HON Full AnalysisView PG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: HON vs PG

Is Honeywell International Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, HON trades at a 66.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $614 vs. price $208), compared to PG's -19.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $123 vs. $147).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Honeywell International Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while HON scores 85/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Honeywell International Inc. in financial distress?

HON's Altman Z-Score of 2.5 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PG scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Honeywell International Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Honeywell International Inc. (HON) generates a 8.2% free cash flow yield, compared to The Procter & Gamble Company's 3.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Honeywell International Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG earns 17.0% ROIC versus HON's 11.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Honeywell International Inc.'s or The Procter & Gamble Company's?

HON's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PG's 69/100 (Safe). HON has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.