Compare StocksPFE vs VLO

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Valero Energy Corporation (VLO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, PFE is overvalued at $28, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -24%. VLO is fairly valued at $409, with an intrinsic value of $396 and a margin of safety of -3%. Of the two, VLO has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.73
VS
VLO
Valero Energy Corporation
$408.80

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
VLO
  • Share count has been reduced by 20% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.64 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
VLO
  • ROIC has declined by 24.6 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 16.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
VLO
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
$8.42B
7.90%
FCF Yield
7.15%
36.48
Trailing P/E
17.03
9.57
Forward P/E
10.95
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
32.40%
5.01%
ROE
27.64%
74.72%
Gross Margin
16.12%
12.68
PEG Ratio
4.08
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.26
6.26%
Dividend Yield
1.19%
PFE: 5Ties: 1VLO: 6
PFEVLO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

VLO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
VLO
$0.15
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$9.71B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
23.6% Overvalued
Price is 23.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.73
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
VLO
71.5% Overvalued
Price is 71.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $408.80
Fair Value: $238.36
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

VLO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $409?

+11.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.2%

The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
VLO
46/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
VLO
-2.93
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
VLO
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 87.0%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,507
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
VLO
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
VLO
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.40M
FISHER ERIC A
Officer
$2.01M
@ $268.17 · 2026-06-29
FISHER ERIC A
Officer
$1.78M
@ $236.90 · 2026-06-18
FISHER ERIC A
Officer
$1.89M
@ $251.61 · 2026-05-18
FRASER JASON W.
Chief Financial Officer
$1.73M
@ $174.02 · 2025-11-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(61/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
VLO
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
VLO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View PFE Full AnalysisView VLO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs VLO

Is Pfizer Inc. or Valero Energy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, VLO trades at a -3.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $396 vs. price $409), compared to PFE's -23.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $28).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Valero Energy Corporation?

VLO scores 46/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. VLO scores 4.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or Valero Energy Corporation?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Valero Energy Corporation's 7.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Valero Energy Corporation?

VLO earns 32.4% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or Valero Energy Corporation's?

VLO's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). VLO has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.