Compare Stocks › PFE vs TGT

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Target Corporation (TGT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, PFE is overvalued at $31, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. TGT is overvalued at $154, with an intrinsic value of $95 and a margin of safety of -63%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52
VS
TGT
Target Corporation
$154.38

Rewards

PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
TGT
  • ★Target Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Target Corporation scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
TGT
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $2.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
TGT
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
$3.43B
7.18%
FCF Yield
4.89%
40.16
Trailing P/E
16.03
10.57
Forward P/E
16.17
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
13.88%
5.01%
ROE
26.41%
74.72%
Gross Margin
28.38%
13.98
PEG Ratio
2.11
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.77
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.60
5.64%
Dividend Yield
3.01%
PFE: 6Ties: 1TGT: 5
PFETGT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TGT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TGT
$0.75
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$5.82B
Δ Market Cap
+$4.35B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TGT
63.4% Overvalued
Price is 63.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $154.38
Fair Value: $94.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

TGT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $154?

+9.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.4%

The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +10.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TGT
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TGT
-2.33
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TGT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.8%Retail & Other 9.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,518
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TGT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TGT
2
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.49M
KREMER MELISSA K
Officer
$2.63M
@ $169.96 · 2026-08-24
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$151,410
@ $163.51 · 2026-08-21
ROATH LISA R
Officer
$966,490
@ $138.07 · 2026-06-29
SYLVESTER CARA A
Officer
$1.26M
@ $125.89 · 2026-05-29
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$240,593
@ $117.19 · 2026-03-17
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$240,593
@ $117.19 · 2026-03-17
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$206,245
@ $100.90 · 2025-06-10
LIEGEL MATTHEW A
Officer
$32,580
@ $113.52 · 2025-03-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TGT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
TGT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View PFE Full AnalysisView TGT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs TGT

Is Pfizer Inc. or Target Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $31), compared to TGT's -63.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $95 vs. $154).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Target Corporation?▼

TGT scores 78/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. TGT scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or Target Corporation?▼

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Target Corporation's 4.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Target Corporation?▼

TGT earns 13.9% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or Target Corporation's?▼

TGT's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). TGT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

PFE vs TGT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io