SafetyMargin.ioSafetyMargin.io
BlogWatchlistCompare
Compare Stocks › PFE vs SNPS

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS)

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41
VS
SNPS
Synopsys, Inc.
$428.25

Rewards

PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
SNPS
  • ★Gross margin of 82.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.02 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
SNPS
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 13.2 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 22% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 65.8x is 29% above the historical average of 51.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
SNPS
Valuation
$13.43B
Free Cash Flow
$3.10B
8.61%
FCF Yield
3.77%
20.15
Trailing P/E
65.78
9.69
Forward P/E
25.11
Quality & Moat
7.67%
ROIC
2.04%
8.96%
ROE
4.36%
75.81%
Gross Margin
82.02%
N/A
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.78
Debt / Equity
0.36
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.37
6.28%
Dividend Yield
N/A
PFE: 7Ties: 1SNPS: 2
PFESNPS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

SNPS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SNPS
$8.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.83B
Δ Market Cap
+$38.71B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SNPS
90.6% Overvalued
Price is 90.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $428.25
Fair Value: $224.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

SNPS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $428?

+24.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.9%

The market implies +24.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
SNPS
63/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SNPS
-3.12
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,692
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SNPS
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 91.0%Retail & Other 6.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,066
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SNPS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $148,904
PAINTER ROBERT G
Director
$148,904
@ $425.44 · 2025-09-11
CASPER MARC N
Director
$439,087
@ $585.45 · 2024-03-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SNPS
2
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $31.71M
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$132,500
@ $530.00 · 2026-01-12
LEE JANET
General Counsel
$127,500
@ $510.00 · 2026-01-07
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.69M
@ $460.77 · 2025-12-19
KANKANWADI SUDHINDRA
Officer
$7.84M
@ $493.76 · 2025-09-22
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$2.23M
@ $609.77 · 2025-09-05
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.69M
@ $589.01 · 2025-09-02
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$4.25M
@ $471.21 · 2025-06-18
GLASER SHELAGH M
Chief Financial Officer
$3.55M
@ $485.72 · 2025-06-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.20M
@ $457.93 · 2025-06-02
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.98M
@ $444.42 · 2025-03-06
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.27M
@ $463.75 · 2025-03-03
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$10.54M
@ $506.01 · 2025-01-15
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$5.70M
@ $553.89 · 2024-08-23
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$305,954
@ $620.60 · 2024-07-15
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$8.22M
@ $620.77 · 2024-07-11
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$20.55M
@ $618.97 · 2024-07-08
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.35M
@ $610.52 · 2024-07-03
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$10.30M
@ $603.27 · 2024-07-01
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$6.66M
@ $602.06 · 2024-06-27
DE GEUS AART J
Officer and Director
$4.05M
@ $600.40 · 2024-06-25
MAHONEY RICHARD S
Officer
$2.03M
@ $611.41 · 2024-06-18
RUNKEL JOHN F JR
General Counsel
$530,684
@ $566.97 · 2024-06-10
RUNKEL JOHN F JR
General Counsel
$722,213
@ $582.90 · 2024-05-24
GHAZI SASSINE E
Chief Executive Officer
$6.00M
@ $582.41 · 2024-05-24
RUNKEL JOHN F JR
General Counsel
$3.08M
@ $579.37 · 2024-04-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SNPS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
SNPS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
View PFE Full AnalysisView SNPS Full Analysis