Compare Stocks › PFE vs SNDK

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Sandisk Corporation (SNDK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, PFE is overvalued at $31, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -36%. SNDK is undervalued at $1151, with an intrinsic value of $4891 and a margin of safety of 76%. Of the two, SNDK has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$30.52
VS
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
$1150.89

Rewards

PFE
  • ★Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
SNDK
  • ★Gross margin of 80.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $16.26 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 18.60 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Risks

PFE
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 40.2x is 32% above the historical average of 30.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
SNDK
  • ⚠FCF yield of 6.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • ⚠7 insider sales totaling $119.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
SNDK
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
$11.24B
7.18%
FCF Yield
6.86%
40.16
Trailing P/E
9.20
10.57
Forward P/E
4.03
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
99.32%
5.01%
ROE
141.17%
74.72%
Gross Margin
79.95%
13.98
PEG Ratio
N/A
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.24
5.64%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
PFE: 2Ties: 2SNDK: 7
PFESNDK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

SNDK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
SNDK
$11.67
created per $1 retained over 1 year
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.43B
Δ Market Cap
+$133.37B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
36.1% Overvalued
Price is 36.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $30.52
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
SNDK
76.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 76.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1150.89
Fair Value: $4891.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $31?

+7.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.3%

The market implies +7.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

SNDK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $1151?

+2.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.0%

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
SNDK
33/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
SNDK

Insufficient data for Beneish M-Score calculation (requires 2+ years).

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,681
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
SNDK
Insiders 1.1%Institutions 82.8%Retail & Other 16.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,370
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
SNDK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
SNDK
7
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $132.73M
GOECKELER DAVID V
Chief Executive Officer
$53.27M
@ $1574.21 · 2026-09-17
VISOSO LOMELIN LUIS FELIPE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.57M
@ $1568.83 · 2026-09-15
GOECKELER DAVID V
Chief Executive Officer
$51.70M
@ $1527.87 · 2026-09-14
SHEK BERNARD
Officer
$4.08M
@ $1767.33 · 2026-09-08
ILKBAHAR ALPER
Chief Technology Officer
$7.26M
@ $1540.58 · 2026-09-03
ILKBAHAR ALPER
Chief Technology Officer
$625,557
@ $1563.89 · 2026-09-03
SHEK BERNARD
Officer
$915,360
@ $1525.60 · 2026-09-01
SHEK BERNARD
Officer
$697,296
@ $1162.16 · 2026-08-03
SHEK BERNARD
Officer
$1.25M
@ $2088.00 · 2026-07-01
SHEK BERNARD
Officer
$1.04M
@ $1736.00 · 2026-06-03
ILKBAHAR ALPER
Chief Technology Officer
$3.51M
@ $1756.58 · 2026-06-01
POKORNY MICHAEL
Officer
$3.49M
@ $1426.18 · 2026-05-12
SAYINER NECIP
Director
$870,301
@ $1503.11 · 2026-05-08
SUZUKI MIYUKI
Director
$2.20M
@ $627.53 · 2026-02-25
SAYINER NECIP
Director
$248,027
@ $195.14 · 2025-12-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
SNDK
FearGreed
😨Fear(34/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
SNDK
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (34)
View PFE Full AnalysisView SNDK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs SNDK

Is Pfizer Inc. or Sandisk Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, SNDK trades at a 76.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $4891 vs. price $1151), compared to PFE's -36.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $31).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Sandisk Corporation?▼

PFE scores 35/100 (None moat), while SNDK scores 33/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?▼

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. SNDK scores 18.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or Sandisk Corporation?▼

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Sandisk Corporation's 6.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Sandisk Corporation?▼

SNDK earns 99.3% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.