Compare StocksPFE vs RSG

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Republic Services, Inc. (RSG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, PFE is overvalued at $25, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -12%. RSG is overvalued at $205, with an intrinsic value of $134 and a margin of safety of -52%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$25.21
VS
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
$204.94

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.2x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
RSG
  • Republic Services, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.00 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 13.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
RSG
  • PEG ratio of 3.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
RSG
Valuation
$12.38B
Free Cash Flow
$2.41B
8.61%
FCF Yield
3.82%
19.24
Trailing P/E
29.45
8.91
Forward P/E
25.42
Quality & Moat
10.19%
ROIC
10.22%
8.31%
ROE
18.35%
74.80%
Gross Margin
43.05%
13.77
PEG Ratio
3.03
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
1.17
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.69
6.61%
Dividend Yield
1.20%
PFE: 8Ties: 2RSG: 2
PFERSG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

RSG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
RSG
$6.36
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.85B
Δ Market Cap
+$24.50B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
12.3% Overvalued
Price is 12.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.21
Fair Value: $22.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
RSG
52.5% Overvalued
Price is 52.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $204.94
Fair Value: $134.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

+5.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +5.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

RSG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $205?

+15.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.1%

The market implies +15.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +14.1%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
RSG
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
RSG
-2.74
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.4%Retail & Other 30.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,744
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
RSG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,844
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
RSG
2
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $203.47M
CASCADE INVESTMENT, L.L.C.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$101.84M
@ $208.69 · 2026-05-18
CASCADE INVESTMENT, L.L.C.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$100.53M
@ $201.40 · 2026-05-13
WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
Director
$100,122
@ $209.46 · 2025-12-09
CASCADE INVESTMENT, L.L.C.
Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$1.00M
@ $234.91 · 2025-08-19
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
RSG
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.79M
CARLSEN ELYSE
Officer
$77,877
@ $216.32 · 2026-05-19
BRUMMER GREGG
Chief Operating Officer
$1.72M
@ $233.94 · 2025-08-22
CARLSEN ELYSE
Officer
$59,495
@ $253.17 · 2025-06-05
RICHARDSON LARSON
Officer
$525,954
@ $239.07 · 2025-03-03
BRUMMER GREGG
Chief Operating Officer
$1.44M
@ $228.20 · 2025-02-19
WEYMOUTH KATHARINE B
Director
$400,187
@ $215.27 · 2024-12-05
DELGHIACCIO BRIAN M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.07M
@ $210.02 · 2024-11-19
COLLINS TOMAGO
Director
$649,625
@ $203.01 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
RSG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
RSG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View PFE Full AnalysisView RSG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs RSG

Is Pfizer Inc. or Republic Services, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a -12.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $22 vs. price $25), compared to RSG's -52.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $134 vs. $205).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Republic Services, Inc.?

RSG scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. RSG scores 3.0 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or Republic Services, Inc.?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 8.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Republic Services, Inc.'s 3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Republic Services, Inc.?

RSG earns 10.2% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or Republic Services, Inc.'s?

RSG's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). RSG has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

PFE vs RSG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io