Compare StocksPFE vs Q

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q)

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$111.94

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
Q

    Risks

    PFE
    • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      PFE
      Q
      Valuation
      $13.43B
      Free Cash Flow
      $776.50M
      8.61%
      FCF Yield
      3.31%
      20.15
      Trailing P/E
      33.92
      9.69
      Forward P/E
      25.33
      Quality & Moat
      7.67%
      ROIC
      6.45%
      8.96%
      ROE
      9.39%
      75.81%
      Gross Margin
      46.17%
      N/A
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.78
      Debt / Equity
      0.61
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.10
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.58
      6.28%
      Dividend Yield
      0.13%
      PFE: 8Ties: 2Q: 1
      PFEQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      PFE

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      PFE
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-10.61B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-146.18B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      PFE
      140.2% Overvalued
      Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $27.41
      Fair Value: $11.41
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      17.4% Overvalued
      Price is 17.4% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $111.94
      Fair Value: $95.35
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      PFE

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

      +11.8%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +4.3%

      The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $112?

      +16.9%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.3%

      The market implies +16.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      PFE
      35/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      PFE
      -2.53
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      PFE
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,693
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.0%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,228
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      PFE
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      BLAYLOCK RONALD E
      Director
      $499,072
      @ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
      GOTTLIEB SCOTT
      Director
      $28,240
      @ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      0
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $329,572
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      PFE
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      DAMICO JENNIFER B.
      Officer
      $64,825
      @ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
      DAMICO JENNIFER B.
      Officer
      $147,714
      @ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      4
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $828,193
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      PFE
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(64/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(41/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 5 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      PFE
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
      View PFE Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis