Compare StocksPFE vs PYPL

Pfizer, Inc. (PFE) vs PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, PFE is undervalued at $25, with a DCF intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. PYPL is undervalued at $57, with an intrinsic value of $131 and a margin of safety of 56%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01
VS
PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
$57.21

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
PYPL
  • PayPal Holdings, Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 19% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.91 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PYPL
  • 6 insider sales with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PYPL
Valuation
$12.38B
Free Cash Flow
$4.42B
N/A
FCF Yield
9.04%
19.09
Trailing P/E
10.81
8.85
Forward P/E
9.88
Quality & Moat
10.19%
ROIC
13.44%
8.31%
ROE
24.50%
74.80%
Gross Margin
40.48%
2.94
PEG Ratio
1.05
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
0.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.46
6.88%
Dividend Yield
0.98%
PFE: 4Ties: 1PYPL: 6
PFEPYPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PYPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PYPL
$-2.02
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$13.50B
Δ Market Cap
$-27.20B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PYPL
56.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $57.21
Fair Value: $131.18
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PYPL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $57?

-2.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.4%

The market implies -2.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PYPL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PYPL
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PYPL
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 82.1%Retail & Other 17.2%
No. of Institutional Holders2,089
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PYPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PYPL
6
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.82M
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$42,529
@ $58.10 · 2026-07-29
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$77,680
@ $58.10 · 2026-07-29
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$196,194
@ $42.54 · 2026-06-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$144,579
@ $42.79 · 2026-06-03
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$23,543
@ $42.65 · 2026-06-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$183,944
@ $44.20 · 2026-05-19
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$536,205
@ $49.96 · 2026-04-29
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$66,128
@ $49.46 · 2026-04-29
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$1.36M
@ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$621,984
@ $46.02 · 2026-03-03
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$98,764
@ $44.73 · 2026-03-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$1.56M
@ $41.49 · 2026-02-18
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$49,114
@ $40.49 · 2026-02-17
KELLER FRANK
Officer
$139,816
@ $40.20 · 2026-02-06
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$249,057
@ $59.84 · 2025-11-19
WEBSTER AARON JAMES
Officer
$615,310
@ $66.29 · 2025-11-10
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$860,935
@ $68.87 · 2025-11-03
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$347,622
@ $69.52 · 2025-10-30
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$94,987
@ $69.13 · 2025-10-30
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$264,702
@ $68.97 · 2025-10-30
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$288,792
@ $69.39 · 2025-08-19
NATALI CHRIS
Officer
$492,529
@ $69.35 · 2025-07-31
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$265,285
@ $69.12 · 2025-07-31
MESSEMER DEBORAH M
Director
$277,036
@ $73.00 · 2025-06-06
KEREERE SUZAN
Officer
$304,827
@ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
SCOTTI DIEGO
Officer
$281,158
@ $73.24 · 2025-06-06
MCGOVERN GAIL J
Director
$176,479
@ $72.15 · 2025-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PYPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PYPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PYPL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PYPL

Is Pfizer, Inc. or PayPal Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to PYPL's 56.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $131 vs. $57).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer, Inc. or PayPal Holdings, Inc.?

PYPL scores 89/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer, Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PYPL scores 2.0 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer, Inc. or PayPal Holdings, Inc.?

PYPL earns 13.4% ROIC versus PFE's 10.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer, Inc.'s or PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s?

PYPL's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PYPL has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.