Compare StocksPFE vs PRU

Pfizer, Inc. (PFE) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, PFE is undervalued at $25, with a DCF intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. PRU is undervalued at $122, with an intrinsic value of $51045422464 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01
VS
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$122.08

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
PRU
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $18.55 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PRU
  • Prudential Financial, Inc. scores only 15/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.14 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PRU
Valuation
$12.38B
Free Cash Flow
$10.38B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
19.09
Trailing P/E
12.57
8.85
Forward P/E
8.36
Quality & Moat
10.19%
ROIC
2.61%
8.31%
ROE
10.71%
74.80%
Gross Margin
28.96%
2.94
PEG Ratio
1.33
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
0.48
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.30
6.88%
Dividend Yield
4.59%
PFE: 5Ties: 1PRU: 5
PFEPRU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PRU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PRU
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$3.13B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.42
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PRU
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $122.08
Fair Value: $51045422463.65
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PRU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $122?

-13.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -13.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PRU
15/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PRU
-2.12
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PRU
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 64.5%Retail & Other 35.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,809
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PRU
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $168,840
STODDARD THOMAS D
Director
$25,742
@ $102.97 · 2026-02-17
WOLK JOSEPH J
Director
$42,128
@ $105.32 · 2026-02-11
CHAPPUIS JACQUES P
Officer
$100,970
@ $100.97 · 2026-02-06
DI SIBIO CARMINE
Director
$22,208
@ $111.04 · 2025-02-20
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$42,364
@ $116.38 · 2024-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PRU
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.64M
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$1.40M
@ $103.25 · 2026-05-14
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$762,215
@ $116.28 · 2025-12-11
SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
Officer
$861,520
@ $107.69 · 2025-12-02
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chairman of the Board
$5.17M
@ $107.39 · 2025-11-10
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$438,600
@ $109.65 · 2025-08-29
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$635,880
@ $105.98 · 2025-03-12
TODMAN MICHAEL A
Director
$333,291
@ $112.98 · 2025-02-07
SULLIVAN ANDREW F
Officer
$3.19M
@ $124.10 · 2024-11-07
LOWREY CHARLES F
Chief Executive Officer
$23.45M
@ $126.29 · 2024-11-07
FALZON ROBERT M
Officer
$6.76M
@ $128.26 · 2024-11-06
FEENEY CAROLINE
Officer
$133,167
@ $119.97 · 2024-09-03
KAPPLER ANN M
General Counsel
$322,028
@ $113.43 · 2024-08-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PRU
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PRU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PRU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PRU

Is Pfizer, Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to PRU's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $51045422464 vs. $122).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer, Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc.?

PFE scores 35/100 (None moat), while PRU scores 15/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Prudential Financial, Inc. in financial distress?

PRU's Altman Z-Score of 0.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer, Inc. or Prudential Financial, Inc.?

PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus PRU's 2.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer, Inc.'s or Prudential Financial, Inc.'s?

PRU's dividend earns a safety score of 84/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PRU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

PFE vs PRU: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io