Compare StocksPFE vs PPL

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs PPL Corporation (PPL)

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41
VS
PPL
PPL Corporation
$37.65

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
PPL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.48 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.47 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
PPL
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PPL
Valuation
$13.43B
Free Cash Flow
$-1.33B
8.61%
FCF Yield
-4.72%
20.15
Trailing P/E
23.68
9.69
Forward P/E
17.81
Quality & Moat
7.67%
ROIC
3.92%
8.96%
ROE
7.94%
75.81%
Gross Margin
43.48%
N/A
PEG Ratio
0.47
Balance Sheet Safety
0.78
Debt / Equity
1.31
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.10
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.20
6.28%
Dividend Yield
3.03%
PFE: 10Ties: 1PPL: 0
PFEPPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PPL
$8.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$564.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$4.78B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
140.2% Overvalued
Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.41
Fair Value: $11.41
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PPL
244.0% Overvalued
Price is 244.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $37.65
Fair Value: $10.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+11.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.3%

The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PPL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PPL
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PPL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PPL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,268
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PPL
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $991,542
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$577,319
@ $36.56 · 2025-08-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$77,637
@ $35.86 · 2025-07-29
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$37,638
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Chief Operating Officer
$61,810
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$10,704
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
GOSMAN ANGELA K
Officer
$226,434
@ $34.66 · 2025-05-23
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$39,858
@ $34.78 · 2025-02-28
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$76,117
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$153,149
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$258,528
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$573,402
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$47,676
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$32,844
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$52,628
@ $33.12 · 2025-01-27
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$213,510
@ $32.16 · 2024-12-17
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$314,680
@ $34.35 · 2024-11-21
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$151,781
@ $31.74 · 2024-08-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
PPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PPL Full Analysis
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs PPL Corporation (PPL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io