Compare StocksPFE vs PPL

Pfizer, Inc. (PFE) vs PPL Corporation (PPL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, PFE is undervalued at $25, with a DCF intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. PPL is undervalued at $35, with an intrinsic value of $7626053094 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01
VS
PPL
PPL Corporation
$35.21

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
PPL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $8.37 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
PPL
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.44 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PPL
Valuation
$12.38B
Free Cash Flow
$-1.62B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
19.09
Trailing P/E
21.60
8.85
Forward P/E
16.63
Quality & Moat
10.19%
ROIC
5.66%
8.31%
ROE
8.32%
74.80%
Gross Margin
43.29%
2.94
PEG Ratio
1.37
Balance Sheet Safety
0.57
Net Debt / Equity
1.27
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.03
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.22
6.88%
Dividend Yield
3.24%
PFE: 8Ties: 2PPL: 1
PFEPPL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PPL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PPL
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$564.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$5.8
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PPL
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $35.21
Fair Value: $7626053094.11
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PPL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PPL
43/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PPL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PPL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 85.6%Retail & Other 14.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,308
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PPL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PPL
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $828,053
CORNETT JOHN GREGORY
Officer
$250,734
@ $35.56 · 2026-06-12
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$577,319
@ $36.56 · 2025-08-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$77,637
@ $35.86 · 2025-07-29
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$37,638
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Chief Operating Officer
$61,810
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$10,704
@ $34.98 · 2025-05-27
GOSMAN ANGELA K
Officer
$226,434
@ $34.66 · 2025-05-23
MARTIN CHRISTINE M.
Officer
$39,858
@ $34.78 · 2025-02-28
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$76,117
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$153,149
@ $33.86 · 2025-02-18
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$258,528
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$573,402
@ $33.38 · 2025-02-03
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$47,676
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
BONENBERGER DAVID J
Officer
$32,844
@ $33.48 · 2025-01-28
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$52,628
@ $33.12 · 2025-01-27
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$213,510
@ $32.16 · 2024-12-17
CROCKETT JOHN R III
Officer
$314,680
@ $34.35 · 2024-11-21
HENNINGER TADD J
Officer and Treasurer
$151,781
@ $31.74 · 2024-08-29
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PPL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
PPL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PPL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PPL

Is Pfizer, Inc. or PPL Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to PPL's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $7626053094 vs. $35).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer, Inc. or PPL Corporation?

PPL scores 43/100 (Narrow moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is PPL Corporation in financial distress?

PPL's Altman Z-Score of 0.4 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer, Inc. or PPL Corporation?

PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus PPL's 5.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer, Inc.'s or PPL Corporation's?

PPL's dividend earns a safety score of 66/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PPL has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

PFE vs PPL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io