Compare StocksPFE vs PH

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, PFE is overvalued at $27, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -22%. PH is overvalued at $919, with an intrinsic value of $779 and a margin of safety of -18%. Of the two, PH has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.46
VS
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$918.75

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
PH
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 14.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 8.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
PH
  • PEG ratio of 3.11 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 10 insider sales totaling $18.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PH
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
$3.90B
7.98%
FCF Yield
3.37%
36.13
Trailing P/E
32.26
9.48
Forward P/E
23.46
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
16.50%
5.01%
ROE
25.08%
74.72%
Gross Margin
37.55%
12.68
PEG Ratio
3.11
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.53
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.45
6.26%
Dividend Yield
0.87%
PFE: 5Ties: 1PH: 6
PFEPH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PH
$7.61
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$7.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$56.69B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
22.4% Overvalued
Price is 22.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.46
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PH
17.9% Overvalued
Price is 17.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $918.75
Fair Value: $779.44
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

+6.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.2%

The market implies +6.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $919?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PH
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PH
-2.48
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 90.5%Retail & Other 9.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,560
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PH
10
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $49.75M
THOMPSON LAURA K
Director
$153,432
@ $958.95 · 2026-09-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$626,363
@ $1040.47 · 2026-08-26
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.31M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-17
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$4.73M
@ $1057.42 · 2026-08-14
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.64M
@ $1057.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$738,521
@ $1055.03 · 2026-08-14
REIDY JAY
Officer
$316,731
@ $1055.77 · 2026-08-14
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$664,569
@ $1053.20 · 2026-08-14
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$5.81M
@ $1057.57 · 2026-08-14
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.59M
@ $1058.00 · 2026-08-14
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.13M
@ $1002.13 · 2026-02-13
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$414,777
@ $1006.74 · 2026-02-13
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.33M
@ $1001.51 · 2026-02-12
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.83M
@ $1009.12 · 2026-02-12
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$818,889
@ $983.06 · 2026-02-12
LEOMBRUNO TODD M.
Chief Financial Officer
$2.07M
@ $1002.34 · 2026-02-11
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$4.69M
@ $996.66 · 2026-02-11
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$4.66M
@ $999.00 · 2026-02-11
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$1.25M
@ $950.05 · 2026-02-02
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$535,766
@ $949.94 · 2026-02-02
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.38M
@ $946.48 · 2026-02-02
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$2.24M
@ $941.31 · 2026-01-30
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$1.02M
@ $952.30 · 2026-01-30
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$2.23M
@ $894.81 · 2025-12-11
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$3.03M
@ $864.58 · 2025-11-12
BENDALI RACHID
Officer
$1.23M
@ $852.99 · 2025-11-12
REIDY JAY
Officer
$337,675
@ $863.62 · 2025-11-12
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$1.13M
@ $750.00 · 2025-09-02
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.47M
@ $750.84 · 2025-08-25
PAREL DINU JOHN
Chief Technology Officer
$817,477
@ $741.14 · 2025-08-12
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$589,162
@ $727.36 · 2025-08-08
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.66 · 2025-08-08
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$826,524
@ $729.50 · 2025-08-08
JACOBSON MATTHEW A.
Officer
$421,510
@ $733.06 · 2025-08-08
HART MARK J
Officer
$1.65M
@ $730.22 · 2025-08-08
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$202,506
@ $728.44 · 2025-08-08
SCOTT PATRICK M.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $729.45 · 2025-08-08
ROSS ANDREW D.
President
$3.20M
@ $732.66 · 2025-08-08
REIDY JAY
Officer
$335,783
@ $675.62 · 2025-05-19
REIDY JAY
Officer
$93,056
@ $620.37 · 2025-05-02
CZAJA MARK T.
Chief Technology Officer
$266,948
@ $711.86 · 2025-01-31
PAREL DINU JOHN
Officer
$1.23M
@ $699.39 · 2024-11-06
MALONE ROBERT W
Officer
$2.76M
@ $700.24 · 2024-11-06
GENTILE THOMAS C.
Officer
$1.70M
@ $701.16 · 2024-11-06
PARMENTIER JENNIFER A
Chief Executive Officer
$3.46M
@ $704.69 · 2024-11-06
HART MARK J
Officer
$2.79M
@ $705.40 · 2024-11-06
BRACHT BEREND
Officer
$1.08M
@ $699.29 · 2024-11-06
ROSS ANDREW D.
Chief Operating Officer
$3.43M
@ $706.04 · 2024-11-06
VERRIER JAMES R.
Director
$825,981
@ $635.37 · 2024-11-04
IVES ANGELA R
Officer
$118,773
@ $635.15 · 2024-11-01
LEONTI JOSEPH R.
General Counsel
$3.71M
@ $631.04 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
PH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PH

Is Pfizer Inc. or Parker-Hannifin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PH trades at a -17.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $779 vs. price $919), compared to PFE's -22.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $27).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

PH scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PH scores 6.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 8.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or Parker-Hannifin Corporation?

PH earns 16.5% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or Parker-Hannifin Corporation's?

PH's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PH has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

PFE vs PH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io