Compare StocksPFE vs PG

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, PFE is overvalued at $28, with a DCF intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -23%. PG is overvalued at $148, with an intrinsic value of $123 and a margin of safety of -20%. Of the two, PG has the wider margin of safety.

PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.64
VS
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$147.55

Rewards

PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.
PG
  • The Procter & Gamble Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • The Procter & Gamble Company scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.56 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
PG
  • PEG ratio of 3.76 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 12 insider sales totaling $5.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
PFE
PG
Valuation
$12.49B
Free Cash Flow
$13.28B
7.93%
FCF Yield
3.88%
36.37
Trailing P/E
22.29
9.54
Forward P/E
19.94
Quality & Moat
9.42%
ROIC
17.00%
5.01%
ROE
30.29%
74.72%
Gross Margin
50.87%
12.56
PEG Ratio
3.76
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Net Debt / Equity
0.46
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.04
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.01
6.26%
Dividend Yield
2.96%
PFE: 4Ties: 1PG: 7
PFEPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PG
$-0.19
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$17.48B
Δ Market Cap
$-3.26B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
PFE
23.2% Overvalued
Price is 23.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.64
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PG
19.7% Overvalued
Price is 19.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $147.55
Fair Value: $123.32
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $148?

+9.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.1%

The market implies +9.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PG
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PG
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.8%Retail & Other 28.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,055
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PG
12
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.52M
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$52,141
@ $145.24 · 2026-08-24
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$491,274
@ $143.02 · 2026-08-21
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$290,312
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
BHARUCHA FREDDY P
Officer
$35,372
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
GAMA PAUL
Officer
$488,311
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
ABD EL HAK HESHAM
Officer
$278,377
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$22,431
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$776,754
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Executive Officer
$888,047
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$1.24M
@ $144.00 · 2026-08-18
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$917,199
@ $165.29 · 2026-02-27
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$288,454
@ $159.45 · 2026-02-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$2.46M
@ $162.28 · 2026-02-13
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$5.86M
@ $162.33 · 2026-02-12
MOELLER JON R
Officer and Director
$28.12M
@ $162.29 · 2026-02-12
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$2.06M
@ $160.31 · 2026-02-11
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.26M
@ $158.00 · 2026-02-04
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$14.50M
@ $151.15 · 2026-01-23
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$108,438
@ $149.57 · 2025-10-30
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$366,574
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$74,594
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$647,289
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$491,252
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$606,796
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$538,139
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.78M
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$156,835
@ $156.84 · 2025-08-29
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$95,308
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.43M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$50,170
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.83M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.35M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$969,908
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$2.05M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$1.55M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.31M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$1.67M
@ $158.67 · 2025-05-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
PG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View PFE Full AnalysisView PG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: PFE vs PG

Is Pfizer Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PG trades at a -19.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $123 vs. price $148), compared to PFE's -23.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $28).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Pfizer Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Pfizer Inc. in financial distress?

PFE's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PG scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Pfizer Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

Pfizer Inc. (PFE) generates a 7.9% free cash flow yield, compared to The Procter & Gamble Company's 3.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Pfizer Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?

PG earns 17.0% ROIC versus PFE's 9.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Pfizer Inc.'s or The Procter & Gamble Company's?

PG's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). PG has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.