Compare Stocks › CVX vs PEP

Chevron Corporation (CVX) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CVX is overvalued at $236, with a DCF intrinsic value of $148 and a margin of safety of -60%. PEP is overvalued at $137, with an intrinsic value of $68 and a margin of safety of -103%. Of the two, CVX has the wider margin of safety.

CVX
Chevron Corporation
$235.52
VS
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$137.34

Rewards

CVX
    PEP
    • ★PepsiCo, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • ★PepsiCo, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
    • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 11.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

    Risks

    CVX
    • ⚠ROIC has declined by 11.0 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $80.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
    PEP
    • ⚠High leverage (1.81x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CVX
    PEP
    Valuation
    N/A
    Free Cash Flow
    $9.04B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    4.83%
    17.29
    Trailing P/E
    17.28
    14.81
    Forward P/E
    15.90
    Quality & Moat
    13.84%
    ROIC
    17.62%
    6.29%
    ROE
    52.19%
    44.40%
    Gross Margin
    54.33%
    1.02
    PEG Ratio
    1.47
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.15
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.81
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.49
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.12
    3.02%
    Dividend Yield
    4.31%
    CVX: 4Ties: 2PEP: 4
    CVXPEP

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CVX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    PEP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CVX
    $-2.55
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $15.44B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-39.41B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PEP
    $-9.83
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $5.34B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-52.53B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CVX
    127.1% Overvalued
    Price is 127.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $235.52
    Fair Value: $103.73
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PEP
    102.7% Overvalued
    Price is 102.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $137.34
    Fair Value: $67.76
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CVX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PEP

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $137?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.8%

    The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CVX
    43/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PEP
    88/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CVX
    -3.12
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PEP
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CVX
    Insiders 4.8%Institutions 71.2%Retail & Other 24.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders5,059
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PEP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 81.2%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,293
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CVX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PEP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CVX
    5
    Sells (3M)
    29
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $296.50M
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $9.77M
    @ $226.59 · 2026-10-20
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $3.38M
    @ $201.06 · 2026-08-17
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $63.57M
    @ $200.46 · 2026-08-14
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $2.74M
    @ $194.95 · 2026-08-11
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $187.00 · 2026-08-05
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $8.57M
    @ $213.30 · 2026-03-30
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $9.07M
    @ $192.12 · 2026-03-06
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $8.60M
    @ $187.78 · 2026-03-02
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $2.19M
    @ $188.58 · 2026-03-02
    NELSON MARK A.
    Officer
    $26.23M
    @ $187.92 · 2026-03-02
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $51.62M
    @ $189.35 · 2026-03-02
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $17.54M
    @ $187.67 · 2026-03-02
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.24M
    @ $186.04 · 2026-02-27
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $441,327
    @ $183.28 · 2026-02-18
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $268,950
    @ $183.83 · 2026-02-18
    BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $184.21 · 2026-02-13
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $122,144
    @ $183.40 · 2026-02-12
    BOOTH THOMAS RYDER
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.07M
    @ $178.43 · 2026-02-03
    WALZ ANDREW BENJAMIN
    Officer
    $3.92M
    @ $176.53 · 2026-02-03
    NELSON MARK A.
    Officer
    $7.98M
    @ $174.17 · 2026-02-02
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.62M
    @ $175.01 · 2026-01-30
    PATE ROBERT HEWITT
    Officer
    $7.26M
    @ $176.40 · 2026-01-30
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $544,000
    @ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.28M
    @ $170.00 · 2026-01-28
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $537,600
    @ $168.00 · 2026-01-14
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $1.31M
    @ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
    BONNER EIMEAR P
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.68M
    @ $165.05 · 2026-01-05
    WIRTH MICHAEL K
    Chief Executive Officer
    $52.27M
    @ $162.99 · 2026-01-05
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $150.27 · 2025-11-21
    KNOWLES ALANA K.
    Officer
    $636,480
    @ $160.00 · 2025-08-29
    GUSTAVSON JEFF B.
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $152.50 · 2025-02-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PEP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    2
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.08M
    FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
    General Counsel
    $404,674
    @ $139.54 · 2026-07-27
    LAGUARTA RAMON L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.68M
    @ $167.39 · 2026-03-02
    GALLAGHER MARIE T
    Officer
    $3.99M
    @ $159.55 · 2025-03-04
    LAGUARTA RAMON L
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.74M
    @ $154.90 · 2025-03-03
    KRISHNAN RAMKUMAR
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.50M
    @ $150.97 · 2025-03-03
    WILLIAMS STEVEN C
    Officer
    $2.71M
    @ $150.89 · 2025-03-03
    FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
    General Counsel
    $1.04M
    @ $150.90 · 2025-03-03
    SANTILLI PAULA ALEJANDRA
    Officer
    $1.18M
    @ $151.89 · 2025-02-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CVX
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(75/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PEP
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CVX
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (75)
    PEP
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    View CVX Full AnalysisView PEP Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CVX vs PEP

    Is Chevron Corporation or PepsiCo, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CVX trades at a -59.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $148 vs. price $236), compared to PEP's -102.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $68 vs. $137).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chevron Corporation or PepsiCo, Inc.?▼

    PEP scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while CVX scores 43/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chevron Corporation or PepsiCo, Inc.?▼

    PEP earns 17.6% ROIC versus CVX's 13.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Chevron Corporation's or PepsiCo, Inc.'s?▼

    PEP's dividend earns a safety score of 34/100 (Unsafe), compared to CVX's 30/100 (Unsafe). PEP has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.