Compare StocksCAT vs PEP

Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) vs PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CAT is fairly valued at $783, with a DCF intrinsic value of $715 and a margin of safety of -10%. PEP is overvalued at $134, with an intrinsic value of $78 and a margin of safety of -72%. Of the two, CAT has the wider margin of safety.

CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
$782.72
VS
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
$134.34

Rewards

CAT
  • Caterpillar Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Caterpillar Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
PEP
  • PepsiCo, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • PepsiCo, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 11.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CAT
  • FCF yield of 2.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 33.7x is 68% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (2.02x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
PEP
  • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAT
PEP
Valuation
$7.45B
Free Cash Flow
$7.83B
2.07%
FCF Yield
4.27%
33.67
Trailing P/E
17.61
24.17
Forward P/E
14.97
Quality & Moat
20.29%
ROIC
17.07%
56.97%
ROE
51.51%
29.71%
Gross Margin
54.17%
1.37
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
2.02
Net Debt / Equity
1.91
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.25
0.83%
Dividend Yield
4.41%
CAT: 2Ties: 3PEP: 7
CATPEP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PEP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAT
$6.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$142.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PEP
$-9.83
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$5.34B
Δ Market Cap
$-52.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAT
9.5% Overvalued
Price is 9.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $782.72
Fair Value: $714.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PEP
71.7% Overvalued
Price is 71.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $134.34
Fair Value: $78.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $783?

+18.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.1%

The market implies +18.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

PEP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $134?

+12.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.7%

The market implies +12.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +12.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAT
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PEP
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAT
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PEP
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAT
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.5%Retail & Other 26.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,935
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PEP
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 81.5%Retail & Other 18.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,332
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAT
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $389,868
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$219,210
@ $876.84 · 2026-05-04
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$170,658
@ $568.86 · 2025-11-06
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$120,262
@ $320.70 · 2025-05-07
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$31,848
@ $318.48 · 2025-05-02
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$36,557
@ $365.57 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$39,857
@ $398.57 · 2024-12-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PEP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAT
1
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $261.04M
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$26.21M
@ $808.98 · 2026-08-28
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$11.44M
@ $907.91 · 2026-05-14
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$5.64M
@ $909.79 · 2026-05-13
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$326,160
@ $906.00 · 2026-05-13
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$14.93M
@ $916.80 · 2026-05-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$8.48M
@ $926.25 · 2026-05-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$22.35M
@ $922.92 · 2026-05-06
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Officer
$14.40M
@ $918.71 · 2026-05-06
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$5.09M
@ $903.18 · 2026-05-05
KAISER JASON
Officer
$4.98M
@ $883.03 · 2026-05-04
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$1.80M
@ $718.93 · 2026-03-05
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.73M
@ $759.61 · 2026-02-23
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.35M
@ $763.39 · 2026-02-17
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$742,802
@ $764.20 · 2026-02-17
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$6.13M
@ $776.90 · 2026-02-13
KAISER JASON
Officer
$1.31M
@ $776.70 · 2026-02-12
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$9.59M
@ $767.08 · 2026-02-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.36M
@ $722.15 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$16.31M
@ $720.11 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$11.33M
@ $704.97 · 2026-02-04
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$26.66M
@ $681.08 · 2026-02-02
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$7.26M
@ $680.45 · 2026-02-02
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$10.91M
@ $682.99 · 2026-02-02
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.75M
@ $575.06 · 2025-12-31
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.71M
@ $571.44 · 2025-12-01
KAISER JASON
Officer
$6.03M
@ $563.60 · 2025-11-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.67M
@ $570.18 · 2025-11-10
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$686,664
@ $572.22 · 2025-11-05
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$8.23M
@ $562.36 · 2025-11-05
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$8.67M
@ $505.29 · 2025-10-10
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$7.94M
@ $462.65 · 2025-09-22
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer and Director
$7.09M
@ $412.87 · 2025-09-02
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$952,840
@ $410.00 · 2025-08-15
KAISER JASON
Officer
$902,650
@ $417.70 · 2025-08-11
KAISER JASON
Officer
$860,148
@ $354.70 · 2025-02-18
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $380.09 · 2025-01-16
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.57M
@ $408.59 · 2024-11-29
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.05M
@ $405.36 · 2024-11-25
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$766.00
@ $383.00 · 2024-11-15
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$5.19M
@ $410.25 · 2024-11-07
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.26M
@ $409.84 · 2024-11-06
DICKINSON DANIEL M
Director
$543,400
@ $418.00 · 2024-11-06
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.01M
@ $378.84 · 2024-11-04
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$368,789
@ $380.98 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PEP
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.08M
FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
General Counsel
$404,674
@ $139.54 · 2026-07-27
LAGUARTA RAMON L
Chief Executive Officer
$4.68M
@ $167.39 · 2026-03-02
GALLAGHER MARIE T
Officer
$3.99M
@ $159.55 · 2025-03-04
WILLIAMS STEVEN C
Officer
$2.71M
@ $150.89 · 2025-03-03
FLAVELL DAVID JAMES
General Counsel
$1.04M
@ $150.90 · 2025-03-03
LAGUARTA RAMON L
Chief Executive Officer
$7.74M
@ $154.90 · 2025-03-03
KRISHNAN RAMKUMAR
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $150.97 · 2025-03-03
SANTILLI PAULA ALEJANDRA
Officer
$1.18M
@ $151.89 · 2025-02-27
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PEP
FearGreed
😨Fear(37/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
PEP
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
View CAT Full AnalysisView PEP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAT vs PEP

Is Caterpillar Inc. or PepsiCo, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CAT trades at a -9.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $715 vs. price $783), compared to PEP's -71.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $78 vs. $134).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Caterpillar Inc. or PepsiCo, Inc.?

PEP scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while CAT scores 75/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Caterpillar Inc. or PepsiCo, Inc.?

PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) generates a 4.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Caterpillar Inc.'s 2.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Caterpillar Inc. or PepsiCo, Inc.?

CAT earns 20.3% ROIC versus PEP's 17.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Caterpillar Inc.'s or PepsiCo, Inc.'s?

CAT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to PEP's 34/100 (Unsafe). CAT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CAT vs PEP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io