Compare StocksPCG vs PFE

PG&E Corporation (PCG) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE)

PCG
PG&E Corporation
$18.19
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.41

Rewards

PCG
    PFE
    • Gross margin of 75.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Dividend yield of 6.28% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
    • FCF yield of 8.6% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

    Risks

    PCG
    • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.42 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    PFE
    • ROIC has declined by 13.9 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 29.6% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    PCG
    PFE
    Valuation
    $-3.41B
    Free Cash Flow
    $13.43B
    -8.54%
    FCF Yield
    8.61%
    15.42
    Trailing P/E
    20.15
    10.08
    Forward P/E
    9.69
    Quality & Moat
    4.46%
    ROIC
    7.67%
    7.91%
    ROE
    8.96%
    39.58%
    Gross Margin
    75.81%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.87
    Debt / Equity
    0.78
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.07
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.10
    1.10%
    Dividend Yield
    6.28%
    PCG: 1Ties: 2PFE: 8
    PCGPFE

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    PCG

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PFE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    PCG
    $0.42
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Value Destroyer
    Σ Retained
    $7.07B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.00B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PFE
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-10.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-146.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    PCG
    843.1% Overvalued
    Price is 843.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $18.19
    Fair Value: $1.93
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PFE
    140.2% Overvalued
    Price is 140.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $27.41
    Fair Value: $11.41
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    PCG

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    PFE

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $27?

    +11.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +4.3%

    The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +4.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    PCG
    33/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PFE
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    PCG
    -2.69
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PFE
    -2.53
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    PCG
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,202
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PFE
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 67.7%Retail & Other 32.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,693
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    PCG
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $119,700
    LARSEN JOHN O
    Director
    $119,700
    @ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
    DENAULT LEO PAUL
    Director
    $100,548
    @ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
    HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
    Director
    $49,989
    @ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
    BAHRI RAJAT
    Director
    $50,054
    @ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
    DENECOUR JESSICA L
    Director
    $21,269
    @ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
    HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
    Director
    $100,052
    @ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PFE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    BLAYLOCK RONALD E
    Director
    $499,072
    @ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
    GOTTLIEB SCOTT
    Director
    $28,240
    @ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    PCG
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.68M
    COOPER KERRY WHORTON
    Director
    $46,700
    @ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $582,002
    @ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
    SINGH SUMEET
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
    GLICKMAN JASON M.
    Divisional Officer
    $470,094
    @ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $562,579
    @ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
    GLICKMAN JASON M.
    Divisional Officer
    $632,155
    @ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
    WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
    Officer
    $242,891
    @ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
    SANTOS MARLENE
    Officer of Subsidiary Company
    $2.06M
    @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
    PETERMAN CARLA J
    Officer
    $532,369
    @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
    WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
    Officer
    $707,170
    @ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PFE
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    DAMICO JENNIFER B.
    Officer
    $64,825
    @ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
    DAMICO JENNIFER B.
    Officer
    $147,714
    @ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    PCG
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PFE
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    PCG
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    PFE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View PCG Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis