Compare StocksORCL vs STT

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs State Street Corporation (STT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, ORCL is undervalued at $151, with a DCF intrinsic value of $386 and a margin of safety of 61%. STT is undervalued at $183, with an intrinsic value of $695 and a margin of safety of 74%. Of the two, STT has the wider margin of safety.

ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$150.54
VS
STT
State Street Corporation
$182.83

Rewards

ORCL
  • Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
STT
  • State Street Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 20% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • PEG ratio of 0.70 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.73 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
STT
  • Gross margin of 0.0% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Trailing P/E of 16.2x is 30% above the historical average of 12.4x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.22 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ORCL
STT
Valuation
$-45.85B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
-10.07%
FCF Yield
N/A
23.60
Trailing P/E
16.15
13.69
Forward P/E
11.94
Quality & Moat
8.55%
ROIC
7.09%
41.19%
ROE
12.44%
63.96%
Gross Margin
0.00%
0.80
PEG Ratio
0.70
Balance Sheet Safety
1.97
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.84
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.40%
Dividend Yield
2.01%
ORCL: 3Ties: 1STT: 4
ORCLSTT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

STT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ORCL
$5.88
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$147.53B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
STT
$2.01
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.45B
Δ Market Cap
+$8.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ORCL
61.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 61.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $150.54
Fair Value: $385.54
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
STT
73.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 73.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $182.83
Fair Value: $694.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

STT

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
STT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
STT
-2.42
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ORCL
Insiders 38.6%Institutions 43.6%Retail & Other 17.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,570
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
STT
Insiders 0.4%Institutions 94.8%Retail & Other 4.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,699
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
STT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $312,475
PORTER BRIAN J
Director
$312,475
@ $124.99 · 2026-03-05
MEANEY WILLIAM L
Director
$10,551
@ $75.36 · 2024-10-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $111.30M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
STT
4
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $21.10M
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$90,595
@ $181.19 · 2026-08-03
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.80M
@ $184.52 · 2026-07-24
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.68M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.02M
@ $184.17 · 2026-07-21
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$895,290
@ $162.78 · 2026-06-11
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$243,210
@ $162.14 · 2026-06-08
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.26M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
HU W BRADFORD
Officer
$1.43M
@ $155.35 · 2026-05-26
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$75,435
@ $150.87 · 2026-05-13
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$461,670
@ $153.89 · 2026-04-22
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$1.47M
@ $152.93 · 2026-04-22
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$2.00M
@ $124.32 · 2026-03-11
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $125.70 · 2026-03-02
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$319,775
@ $127.91 · 2026-02-24
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$721,420
@ $127.10 · 2026-02-23
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$1.12M
@ $128.00 · 2026-02-23
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$672,890
@ $118.55 · 2025-11-28
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$175,860
@ $117.24 · 2025-10-27
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$115,170
@ $115.17 · 2025-08-26
O'HANLEY RONALD P.
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $112.39 · 2025-08-21
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$175,046
@ $111.07 · 2025-08-19
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$108,197
@ $109.29 · 2025-07-22
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.07M
@ $96.61 · 2025-05-30
RICHARDS MICHAEL L
Officer
$70,530
@ $94.04 · 2025-05-09
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$117,936
@ $90.72 · 2025-05-06
TAHIRI MOSTAPHA
Chief Operating Officer
$360,725
@ $90.43 · 2025-05-02
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.03M
@ $88.83 · 2025-05-01
BISEGNA ANTHONY C.
Officer
$310,590
@ $88.74 · 2025-05-01
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$1.94M
@ $98.24 · 2025-02-28
AMBROSIUS JOERG
Officer
$288,202
@ $100.07 · 2025-02-19
DE SAINT AIGNAN PATRICK
Director
$802,479
@ $99.96 · 2025-02-18
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$368,536
@ $99.47 · 2025-02-18
HORGAN KATHRYN M
Officer
$1.22M
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
FOGARTY ANN
Officer
$146,955
@ $97.97 · 2024-11-25
MILROD DONNA M
Officer
$9,631
@ $95.36 · 2024-11-18
PLANSKY JOHN
Officer
$1.27M
@ $91.32 · 2024-10-18
SCHAEFER ELIZABETH
Officer
$46,250
@ $92.50 · 2024-10-17
HUNG YIE-HSIN
Chief Executive Officer
$325,500
@ $93.00 · 2024-10-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
STT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
STT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View ORCL Full AnalysisView STT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ORCL vs STT

Is Oracle Corporation or State Street Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, STT trades at a 73.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $695 vs. price $183), compared to ORCL's 61.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $386 vs. $151).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Oracle Corporation or State Street Corporation?

STT scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is State Street Corporation in financial distress?

STT's Altman Z-Score of 0.2 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 1.7 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Oracle Corporation or State Street Corporation?

ORCL earns 8.5% ROIC versus STT's 7.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Oracle Corporation's or State Street Corporation's?

STT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). STT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

ORCL vs STT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io