Compare StocksORCL vs REGN

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, ORCL is undervalued at $137, with a DCF intrinsic value of $404 and a margin of safety of 66%. REGN is undervalued at $764, with an intrinsic value of $1362 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$137.43
VS
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$763.62

Rewards

ORCL
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
REGN
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Altman Z-Score of 7.56 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -1.1x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (3.15x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
REGN
  • ROIC has declined by 7.3 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.15 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ORCL
REGN
Valuation
$-24.54B
Free Cash Flow
$3.07B
-6.20%
FCF Yield
3.90%
23.57
Trailing P/E
18.89
12.62
Forward P/E
12.80
Quality & Moat
9.15%
ROIC
11.80%
53.38%
ROE
14.04%
65.82%
Gross Margin
44.46%
0.73
PEG Ratio
1.34
Balance Sheet Safety
3.15
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.44
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.12
1.54%
Dividend Yield
0.49%
ORCL: 4Ties: 2REGN: 6
ORCLREGN

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

REGN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ORCL
$4.29
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.08B
Δ Market Cap
+$107.70B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
REGN
$0.20
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$12.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.52B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ORCL
65.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 65.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $137.43
Fair Value: $403.51
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
REGN
44.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $763.62
Fair Value: $1362.39
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

REGN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $764?

+4.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.1%

The market implies +4.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +10.1%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ORCL
67/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
REGN
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ORCL
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
REGN
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 43.9%Retail & Other 15.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,502
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
REGN
Insiders 2.1%Institutions 93.7%Retail & Other 4.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,936
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
REGN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $126.77M
HENLEY JEFFREY O
Officer and Director
$63.66M
@ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
REGN
1
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.60M
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$130,030
@ $650.15 · 2026-07-02
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$70,524
@ $705.24 · 2026-05-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,727
@ $777.27 · 2026-04-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$78,550
@ $785.50 · 2026-03-02
ZOGHBI HUDA Y
Director
$1.28M
@ $781.33 · 2026-02-19
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$77,853
@ $778.53 · 2026-02-09
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$1.59M
@ $778.52 · 2026-02-09
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$1.20M
@ $800.00 · 2026-01-07
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$570,000
@ $750.00 · 2025-11-20
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$280,766
@ $651.43 · 2025-11-07
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$4.25M
@ $654.27 · 2025-10-29
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$844,610
@ $844.61 · 2024-11-01
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.05M
@ $1054.06 · 2024-10-01
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$104,878
@ $1048.78 · 2024-10-01
MCCOURT MARION E
Officer
$1.18M
@ $1178.73 · 2024-09-03
RYAN ARTHUR F.
Director
$117,868
@ $1178.68 · 2024-09-03
POON CHRISTINE A
Director
$12.55M
@ $1158.17 · 2024-08-15
BASSLER BONNIE L
Director
$884,520
@ $1170.00 · 2024-08-15
MURPHY ANDREW J
Officer
$7.34M
@ $1153.15 · 2024-08-14
STAHL NEIL E
Officer
$5.64M
@ $1084.54 · 2024-08-08
PITOFSKY JASON
Officer
$521,090
@ $1070.00 · 2024-08-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
REGN
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
REGN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View ORCL Full AnalysisView REGN Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ORCL vs REGN

Is Oracle Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 65.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $404 vs. price $137), compared to REGN's 44.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $1362 vs. $764).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Oracle Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?

REGN scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. REGN scores 7.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Oracle Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) generates a 3.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -6.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Oracle Corporation or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.?

REGN earns 11.8% ROIC versus ORCL's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Oracle Corporation's or Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s?

REGN's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). REGN has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.