Compare StocksORCL vs Q

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ORCL is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $285 and a margin of safety of 35%. Q is overvalued at $169, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -35%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.29
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$168.98

Rewards

ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
Q

    Risks

    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (2.89x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Insiders have sold $2.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.83 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    Q
    Valuation
    $-20.34B
    Free Cash Flow
    $988.00M
    -3.84%
    FCF Yield
    2.79%
    31.56
    Trailing P/E
    54.33
    16.89
    Forward P/E
    35.24
    Quality & Moat
    9.68%
    ROIC
    7.44%
    53.38%
    ROE
    7.48%
    65.82%
    Gross Margin
    46.09%
    1.06
    PEG Ratio
    2.83
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.89
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.49
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.92
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.54
    1.09%
    Dividend Yield
    0.21%
    ORCL: 7Ties: 1Q: 4
    ORCLQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    ORCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    $17.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $18.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$329.28B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    35.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $184.29
    Fair Value: $285.39
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    45.2% Overvalued
    Price is 45.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $168.98
    Fair Value: $116.40
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    ORCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $169?

    +20.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +17.0%

    The market implies +20.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.0%Retail & Other 15.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,512
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.7%Retail & Other 23.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,475
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $112,258
    FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
    Director
    $112,258
    @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
    MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
    Director
    $947,913
    @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.89B
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $2.64M
    @ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
    KEHRING DOUGLAS A
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
    HURA MARK
    Officer
    $2.95M
    @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $437,064
    @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.07M
    @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $641,958
    @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $10.87M
    @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $5.12M
    @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    President
    $6.31M
    @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $4.04M
    @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $770,656
    @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $267.24M
    @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $794.64M
    @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $764.01M
    @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $1.74M
    @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $428,562
    @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $291,620
    @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $705.46M
    @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
    ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $322.05M
    @ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $60.58M
    @ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $5.22M
    @ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $34.04M
    @ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $970,297
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $59,340
    @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $82,764
    @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    ORCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View ORCL Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: ORCL vs Q

    Is Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $285 vs. price $184), compared to Q's -34.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $169).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    ORCL scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

    Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ORCL scores 2.7 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 2.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    ORCL earns 9.7% ROIC versus Q's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Oracle Corporation's or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

    Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.

    ORCL vs Q: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io