Compare StocksORCL vs Q

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, ORCL is undervalued at $143, with a DCF intrinsic value of $386 and a margin of safety of 63%. Q is fairly valued at $115, with an intrinsic value of $132 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$143.16
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$114.86

Rewards

ORCL
  • Gross margin of 64.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.80 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
Q

    Risks

    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (1.97x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.67 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    Q

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      Q
      Valuation
      $-45.85B
      Free Cash Flow
      $772.25M
      -10.59%
      FCF Yield
      3.21%
      22.44
      Trailing P/E
      41.02
      13.02
      Forward P/E
      21.36
      Quality & Moat
      8.55%
      ROIC
      7.61%
      41.19%
      ROE
      6.72%
      63.96%
      Gross Margin
      46.22%
      0.80
      PEG Ratio
      1.24
      Balance Sheet Safety
      1.97
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.47
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      3.84
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      2.34
      1.40%
      Dividend Yield
      0.28%
      ORCL: 7Ties: 1Q: 4
      ORCLQ

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      ORCL

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Q

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      $5.04
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Exceptional Value Creator
      Σ Retained
      $25.08B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$126.27B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      Q
      Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      62.9% Margin of Safety
      Price is 62.9% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $143.16
      Fair Value: $385.54
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      Q
      6.5% Margin of Safety
      Price is 6.5% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $114.86
      Fair Value: $122.85
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      ORCL

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Q

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $115?

      +15.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +15.6%

      The market implies +15.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      67/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      Q
      47/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      -2.58
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      Q
      -2.57
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      Insiders 38.6%Institutions 43.6%Retail & Other 17.8%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,570
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      Q
      Insiders 0.1%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 21.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,676
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      0
      Buys (3M)
      0
      Buys (12M)
      FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
      Director
      $112,258
      @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
      MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
      Director
      $947,913
      @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      Q
      1
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $467,708
      DE BONDT KARIN
      Director
      $138,136
      @ $138.14 · 2026-08-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $250,452
      @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
      GREEN BYRON
      Director
      $79,120
      @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      1
      Sells (3M)
      12
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $111.30M
      HENLEY JEFFREY O
      Officer and Director
      $63.66M
      @ $159.16 · 2026-06-24
      LEVEY STUART A
      Officer
      $2.64M
      @ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.55M
      @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
      KEHRING DOUGLAS A
      Officer
      $6.82M
      @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
      HURA MARK
      Officer
      $2.95M
      @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $437,064
      @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.93M
      @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
      SMITH MARIA
      Officer
      $2.80M
      @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Chief Executive Officer
      $11.07M
      @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
      LEVEY STUART A
      Officer
      $5.93M
      @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $641,958
      @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $10.87M
      @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $5.12M
      @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      President
      $6.31M
      @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
      SICILIA MICHAEL D
      Officer
      $4.04M
      @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $770,656
      @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
      SMITH MARIA
      Officer
      $2.33M
      @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $267.24M
      @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $794.64M
      @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $764.01M
      @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
      MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
      Officer
      $3.21M
      @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
      CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
      Director
      $1.74M
      @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $428,562
      @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
      SELIGMAN NAOMI O
      Director
      $291,620
      @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
      CATZ SAFRA A
      Chief Executive Officer
      $705.46M
      @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      Q
      0
      Sells (3M)
      6
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $970,297
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $59,340
      @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
      STERIN STEVEN M
      Director
      $82,764
      @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
      GOSS MICHAEL G.
      Officer
      $160,677
      @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
      KEMP JON D
      Chief Executive Officer
      $480,732
      @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
      NOONAN ANNE P
      Director
      $534.00
      @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
      KANG SANG HO
      Officer
      $186,250
      @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(31/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      Q
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(36/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      ORCL
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
      Q
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
      View ORCL Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: ORCL vs Q

      Is Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 62.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $386 vs. price $143), compared to Q's 13.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $132 vs. $115).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      ORCL scores 67/100 (Narrow moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

      ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 1.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. Q scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 3.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -10.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Oracle Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

      ORCL earns 8.5% ROIC versus Q's 7.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

      Which dividend is safer, Oracle Corporation's or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

      Q's dividend earns a safety score of 85/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). Q has raised its dividend for 0 consecutive years.