Compare StocksORCL vs OTIS

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) vs Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, ORCL is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $285 and a margin of safety of 35%. OTIS is fairly valued at $73, with an intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of 13%. Of the two, ORCL has the wider margin of safety.

ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$184.29
VS
OTIS
Otis Worldwide Corporation
$73.27

Rewards

ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 65.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 3 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
OTIS
  • Otis Worldwide Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Otis Worldwide Corporation scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.5x is 22% below the historical average of 25.0x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (2.89x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $2.6M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
OTIS
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.33 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • FCF yield of 6.0% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
ORCL
OTIS
Valuation
$-20.34B
Free Cash Flow
$1.68B
-3.84%
FCF Yield
5.98%
31.56
Trailing P/E
19.49
16.89
Forward P/E
15.53
Quality & Moat
9.68%
ROIC
21.68%
53.38%
ROE
N/A
65.82%
Gross Margin
30.55%
1.06
PEG Ratio
1.40
Balance Sheet Safety
2.89
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.96
1.09%
Dividend Yield
2.31%
ORCL: 2Ties: 1OTIS: 7
ORCLOTIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

OTIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
OTIS
$0.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$2.64B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
ORCL
35.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.29
Fair Value: $285.39
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
OTIS
12.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 12.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $73.27
Fair Value: $83.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

OTIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $73?

+10.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +8.4%

The market implies +10.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
ORCL
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
OTIS
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
OTIS
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.0%Retail & Other 15.5%
No. of Institutional Holders4,512
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
OTIS
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 94.9%Retail & Other 5.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,710
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
OTIS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
ORCL
1
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.89B
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
OTIS
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $17.22M
LEFEBURE THIBAULT PIERRE MARIE
Officer
$125,184
@ $76.89 · 2026-05-07
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$4.42M
@ $92.25 · 2026-02-12
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$106,445
@ $90.05 · 2026-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$2.48M
@ $90.38 · 2026-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$9.29M
@ $90.29 · 2026-02-05
GREEN NEIL
Officer
$518,710
@ $86.45 · 2026-02-02
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$277,647
@ $91.69 · 2025-11-05
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$701,287
@ $105.30 · 2025-03-10
DE MONTLIVAULT STEPHANE
Officer
$2.43M
@ $97.14 · 2025-02-13
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.72M
@ $95.77 · 2025-02-10
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$163,050
@ $95.91 · 2025-02-10
MARKS JUDITH FRAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
LAFRENIERE NORA E.
General Counsel
$450,815
@ $94.41 · 2025-02-05
ZHENG PEIMING
Officer
$3.12M
@ $95.43 · 2025-01-31
RYAN MICHAEL PATRICK
Officer
$569,159
@ $100.95 · 2024-11-08
LUERSMAN ABBE
Officer
$909,209
@ $101.02 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
OTIS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(44/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
OTIS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
View ORCL Full AnalysisView OTIS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: ORCL vs OTIS

Is Oracle Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ORCL trades at a 35.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $285 vs. price $184), compared to OTIS's 12.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $73).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Oracle Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation?

OTIS scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while ORCL scores 68/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Oracle Corporation in financial distress?

ORCL's Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. OTIS scores 3.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Oracle Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation?

Otis Worldwide Corporation (OTIS) generates a 6.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Oracle Corporation's -3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Oracle Corporation or Otis Worldwide Corporation?

OTIS earns 21.7% ROIC versus ORCL's 9.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Oracle Corporation's or Otis Worldwide Corporation's?

OTIS's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to ORCL's 79/100 (Safe). OTIS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.