Compare StocksBA vs ORCL

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

BA
The Boeing Company
$201.18
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$155.52

Rewards

BA
    ORCL
    • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
    • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    BA
    • Gross margin of 4.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • The Boeing Company scores only 23/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 31% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    ORCL
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    BA
    ORCL
    Valuation
    $1.76B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-22.30B
    1.11%
    FCF Yield
    -4.99%
    81.45
    Trailing P/E
    27.92
    42.77
    Forward P/E
    19.51
    Quality & Moat
    -3.63%
    ROIC
    8.22%
    34.63%
    ROE
    31.86%
    4.83%
    Gross Margin
    67.08%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.14
    Balance Sheet Safety
    10.33
    Debt / Equity
    4.15
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    N/A
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.48
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    1.29%
    BA: 3Ties: 1ORCL: 5
    BAORCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    BA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    ORCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    BA
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-12.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$56.54B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    ORCL
    $17.69
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $18.61B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$329.28B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    BA
    17.3% Overvalued
    Price is 17.3% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $201.18
    Fair Value: $171.52
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    ORCL
    235.9% Overvalued
    Price is 235.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $155.52
    Fair Value: $46.30
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    BA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $201?

    +27.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +30.7%
    ORCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    BA
    23/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    ORCL
    71/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    BA
    -3.01
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    ORCL
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    BA
    Insiders 0.0%Institutions 73.9%Retail & Other 26.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,009
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    ORCL
    Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.3%Retail & Other 15.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,769
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    1
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.10M
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $499,966
    @ $224.20 · 2026-03-03
    DEASY DANA S
    Officer
    $99,102
    @ $178.88 · 2025-11-24
    BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
    Director
    $497,420
    @ $226.10 · 2025-08-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    ORCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $112,258
    FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
    Director
    $112,258
    @ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
    MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
    Director
    $947,913
    @ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    BA
    4
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.64M
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $351,484
    @ $233.85 · 2026-02-24
    SCHMIDT ANN M
    Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $243.37 · 2026-02-17
    MCKENZIE HOWARD E
    Officer
    $2.46M
    @ $234.01 · 2026-02-05
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $644,598
    @ $236.03 · 2026-02-04
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $270,009
    @ $197.66 · 2025-11-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $867,069
    @ $229.99 · 2025-08-08
    NELSON BRENDAN J.
    President
    $132,019
    @ $206.28 · 2025-05-15
    SHOCKEY JEFFREY S
    Officer
    $650,198
    @ $202.87 · 2025-05-13
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $558,009
    @ $186.00 · 2025-05-06
    RAYMOND DAVID CHRISTOPHER
    Officer
    $729,164
    @ $187.01 · 2025-05-02
    POPE STEPHANIE F
    Officer
    $3.08M
    @ $183.78 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $368,018
    @ $184.01 · 2025-05-01
    CLEARY MICHAEL J
    Officer
    $268,530
    @ $179.02 · 2025-02-26
    AMULURU UMA M
    Officer
    $570,759
    @ $180.73 · 2025-02-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    ORCL
    4
    Sells (3M)
    22
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.90B
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
    KEHRING DOUGLAS A
    Officer
    $6.82M
    @ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
    HURA MARK
    Officer
    $2.95M
    @ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $437,064
    @ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.93M
    @ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.80M
    @ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $11.07M
    @ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
    LEVEY STUART A
    Officer
    $5.93M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $641,958
    @ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $10.87M
    @ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $5.12M
    @ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    President
    $6.31M
    @ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
    SICILIA MICHAEL D
    Officer
    $4.04M
    @ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $770,656
    @ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $2.33M
    @ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $267.24M
    @ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $794.64M
    @ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $764.01M
    @ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $1.74M
    @ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
    MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
    Officer
    $3.21M
    @ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $428,562
    @ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
    SELIGMAN NAOMI O
    Director
    $291,620
    @ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $705.46M
    @ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
    SMITH MARIA
    Officer
    $1.04M
    @ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
    ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
    Chief Technology Officer
    $322.05M
    @ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $60.58M
    @ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $5.22M
    @ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
    SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
    Officer
    $34.04M
    @ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
    BOSKIN MICHAEL J
    Director
    $5.30M
    @ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.32M
    @ $116.00 · 2024-05-03
    CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
    Director
    $2.90M
    @ $116.13 · 2024-05-01
    CATZ SAFRA A
    Chief Executive Officer
    $346.77M
    @ $126.10 · 2024-03-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    BA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(46/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    ORCL
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    BA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
    ORCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View BA Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis
    The Boeing Company (BA) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io