Compare Stocks › NVR vs TSLA

NVR, Inc. (NVR) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, NVR is undervalued at $5959, with a DCF intrinsic value of $11234 and a margin of safety of 47%. TSLA is overvalued at $400, with an intrinsic value of $142 and a margin of safety of -181%. Of the two, NVR has the wider margin of safety.

NVR
NVR, Inc.
$5958.56
VS
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
$399.81

Rewards

NVR
  • ★NVR, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
TSLA
  • ★Altman Z-Score of 19.94 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -2.9x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

NVR
  • ⚠Gross margin of 21.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.97 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
TSLA
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 21.5 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 19.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 19% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NVR
TSLA
Valuation
N/A
Free Cash Flow
$4.97B
N/A
FCF Yield
0.31%
16.47
Trailing P/E
439.35
16.81
Forward P/E
185.50
Quality & Moat
23.31%
ROIC
4.13%
28.30%
ROE
3.84%
21.10%
Gross Margin
19.29%
4.97
PEG Ratio
4.66
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-0.02
Net Debt / EBITDA
-2.95
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
NVR: 5Ties: 1TSLA: 4
NVRTSLA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NVR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TSLA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NVR
$1.21
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$5.57B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSLA
$50.04
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$25.92B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.30T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NVR
35.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $5958.56
Fair Value: $9197.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSLA
574.9% Overvalued
Price is 574.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $399.81
Fair Value: $59.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NVR

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

TSLA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $400?

+51.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +46.8%

The market implies +51.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +46.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NVR
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
TSLA
31/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NVR
-2.11
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSLA
-2.86
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NVR
Insiders 5.6%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 1.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,004
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSLA
Insiders 17.8%Institutions 43.7%Retail & Other 38.5%
No. of Institutional Holders5,303
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NVR
1
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $577,832
OLIVER GEORGE R SR
Director
$405,185
@ $6431.51 · 2026-08-07
DEVITO MICHAEL J.
Director
$73,694
@ $6699.45 · 2026-04-24
DEVITO MICHAEL J.
Director
$98,953
@ $7068.07 · 2025-11-03
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSLA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
MUSK ELON REEVE
Chief Executive Officer
$999.96M
@ $389.28 · 2025-09-12
GEBBIA JOSEPH
Director
$1.03M
@ $256.31 · 2025-04-24
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NVR
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.01M
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.58M
@ $7922.06 · 2026-02-13
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$4.05M
@ $8100.00 · 2026-02-10
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.62M
@ $8091.62 · 2026-02-05
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$1.76M
@ $8000.00 · 2026-02-04
JUNG ALEXANDRA A
Director
$1.62M
@ $8082.44 · 2025-08-26
JUNG ALEXANDRA A
Director
$411,587
@ $8231.74 · 2025-08-22
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$4.86M
@ $8100.00 · 2025-08-13
ROSS SUSAN WILLIAMSON
Director
$981,285
@ $7850.28 · 2025-08-04
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$3.76M
@ $7529.89 · 2025-02-11
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$1.07M
@ $7515.60 · 2025-02-10
PREISER DAVID A
Director
$2.33M
@ $9302.64 · 2024-11-08
ECKERT THOMAS D
Director
$9.22M
@ $9216.32 · 2024-11-07
KELPY MATTHEW B.
Officer
$3.78M
@ $9450.00 · 2024-11-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSLA
1
Sells (3M)
9
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $60.96M
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$938,419
@ $360.24 · 2026-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $402.27 · 2026-06-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.35M
@ $450.00 · 2026-05-13
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.99M
@ $378.11 · 2026-04-30
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$9.27M
@ $359.33 · 2026-03-30
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$899,077
@ $397.12 · 2026-03-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$10.69M
@ $415.56 · 2026-02-25
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$25.61M
@ $450.66 · 2025-12-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.17M
@ $443.93 · 2025-12-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$918,137
@ $352.45 · 2025-09-08
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.77M
@ $295.26 · 2025-07-08
ZHU XIAOTONG
Officer
$4.86M
@ $323.81 · 2025-06-12
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$732,573
@ $285.71 · 2025-06-09
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.40M
@ $342.30 · 2025-06-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$32.73M
@ $357.39 · 2025-05-27
EHRENPREIS IRA MATTHEW
Director
$170.64M
@ $357.30 · 2025-05-27
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.05M
@ $350.11 · 2025-05-16
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.20M
@ $300.00 · 2025-05-09
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$30.81M
@ $274.12 · 2025-05-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.14M
@ $284.40 · 2025-05-01
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$32.10M
@ $285.58 · 2025-04-29
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.00M
@ $250.00 · 2025-04-07
MURDOCH JAMES RUPERT
Director
$13.19M
@ $240.79 · 2025-03-10
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$718,111
@ $268.75 · 2025-03-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$33.67M
@ $299.61 · 2025-03-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $296.02 · 2025-03-03
MUSK KIMBAL J
Director
$27.59M
@ $367.87 · 2025-02-06
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$43.16M
@ $384.04 · 2025-02-03
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.68M
@ $383.11 · 2025-02-03
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$41.16M
@ $411.63 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.89M
@ $413.56 · 2025-01-06
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$975,015
@ $374.29 · 2024-12-06
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$35.25M
@ $352.54 · 2024-12-04
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$39.79M
@ $354.06 · 2024-12-02
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$2.48M
@ $354.43 · 2024-12-02
DENHOLM ROBYN M
Director
$35.34M
@ $314.44 · 2024-11-15
WILSON - THOMPSON KATHLEEN
Director
$34.60M
@ $346.02 · 2024-11-11
TANEJA VAIBHAV
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $316.91 · 2024-11-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NVR
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSLA
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NVR
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
TSLA
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View NVR Full AnalysisView TSLA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NVR vs TSLA

Is NVR, Inc. or Tesla, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NVR trades at a 47.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $11234 vs. price $5959), compared to TSLA's -181.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $142 vs. $400).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, NVR, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?▼

NVR scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while TSLA scores 31/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NVR, Inc. or Tesla, Inc.?▼

NVR earns 23.3% ROIC versus TSLA's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.