Compare StocksNVDA vs Q

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, NVDA is overvalued at $211, with a DCF intrinsic value of $163 and a margin of safety of -29%. Q is overvalued at $169, with an intrinsic value of $125 and a margin of safety of -35%. Of the two, NVDA has the wider margin of safety.

NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
$210.69
VS
Q
Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$168.98

Rewards

NVDA
  • NVIDIA Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 74.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 193.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
Q

    Risks

    NVDA
    • FCF yield of 1.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Beneish M-Score of -1.06 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.
    • 38 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
    Q
    • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • PEG ratio of 2.83 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    Q
    Valuation
    $96.68B
    Free Cash Flow
    $988.00M
    1.89%
    FCF Yield
    2.79%
    32.26
    Trailing P/E
    54.33
    16.55
    Forward P/E
    35.24
    Quality & Moat
    63.06%
    ROIC
    7.44%
    114.29%
    ROE
    7.48%
    74.14%
    Gross Margin
    46.09%
    0.65
    PEG Ratio
    2.83
    Balance Sheet Safety
    Net cash
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.49
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    -0.24
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.54
    0.47%
    Dividend Yield
    0.19%
    NVDA: 10Ties: 1Q: 1
    NVDAQ

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    NVDA

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Q

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    $17.68
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $220.50B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$3.90T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    Q
    Not enough historical data to compute the retained earnings test.

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    44.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $210.69
    Fair Value: $378.18
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    Q
    45.2% Overvalued
    Price is 45.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $168.98
    Fair Value: $116.40
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    NVDA

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $211?

    +17.9%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +20.8%

    The market implies +17.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Q

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $169?

    +20.2%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +17.0%

    The market implies +20.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    69/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    Q
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    -1.06
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    Q
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    Insiders 4.0%Institutions 70.9%Retail & Other 25.1%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,563
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    Q
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 76.4%Retail & Other 23.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,477
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    Q
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $329,572
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $250,452
    @ $77.30 · 2025-11-21
    GREEN BYRON
    Director
    $79,120
    @ $79.12 · 2025-11-19
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    1
    Sells (3M)
    38
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.09B
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $133,750
    @ $214.00 · 2026-05-27
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $942,944
    @ $174.75 · 2026-03-20
    SHAH AARTI S
    Director
    $3.36M
    @ $176.71 · 2026-03-19
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $555,440
    @ $184.90 · 2026-03-13
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $15.19M
    @ $189.85 · 2026-01-02
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $179.98 · 2025-12-19
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $112,317
    @ $179.42 · 2025-11-24
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.20M
    @ $207.91 · 2025-10-29
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.56M
    @ $188.47 · 2025-10-28
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.73M
    @ $181.04 · 2025-10-23
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $41.06M
    @ $182.48 · 2025-10-20
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $41.34M
    @ $183.73 · 2025-10-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.89M
    @ $190.60 · 2025-10-10
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.05M
    @ $186.89 · 2025-10-07
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $42.09M
    @ $187.08 · 2025-10-02
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.23M
    @ $178.82 · 2025-09-29
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.21M
    @ $178.69 · 2025-09-24
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $617,298
    @ $176.37 · 2025-09-19
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.18M
    @ $174.14 · 2025-09-19
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.75M
    @ $176.66 · 2025-09-16
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.28M
    @ $174.59 · 2025-09-11
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.01M
    @ $168.95 · 2025-09-08
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.61M
    @ $171.60 · 2025-09-03
    HUDSON BEACH DAWN E
    Director
    $15.38M
    @ $170.90 · 2025-09-03
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $27.12M
    @ $180.79 · 2025-08-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.96M
    @ $182.04 · 2025-08-13
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.66M
    @ $180.70 · 2025-08-08
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.78M
    @ $176.80 · 2025-08-05
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $40.18M
    @ $178.58 · 2025-07-31
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $39.16M
    @ $174.02 · 2025-07-28
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.22M
    @ $169.87 · 2025-07-23
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $38.71M
    @ $172.05 · 2025-07-18
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $37.59M
    @ $167.08 · 2025-07-15
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $36.43M
    @ $161.91 · 2025-07-10
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $35.55M
    @ $158.02 · 2025-07-07
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $35.16M
    @ $156.27 · 2025-07-01
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $30.47M
    @ $152.33 · 2025-06-26
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.40M
    @ $144.04 · 2025-06-23
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $646,469
    @ $143.66 · 2025-06-20
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $91,608
    @ $138.80 · 2025-05-30
    BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
    Director
    $6.74M
    @ $134.82 · 2025-05-30
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $525,585
    @ $116.80 · 2025-03-21
    KRESS COLETTE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.79M
    @ $116.83 · 2025-03-21
    SHAH AARTI S
    Director
    $2.37M
    @ $118.42 · 2025-03-20
    BURGESS ROBERT KENNETH
    Director
    $6.16M
    @ $115.49 · 2025-03-13
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $292,930
    @ $110.00 · 2025-03-10
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $608,775
    @ $135.28 · 2024-12-13
    KRESS COLETTE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $9.03M
    @ $135.40 · 2024-12-13
    DABIRI JOHN O
    Director
    $101,672
    @ $142.00 · 2024-11-25
    ROBERTSON DONALD F JR
    Officer
    $524,293
    @ $116.51 · 2024-09-20
    KRESS COLETTE M.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.77M
    @ $116.59 · 2024-09-20
    HUANG JEN-HSUN
    Chief Executive Officer
    $28.55M
    @ $118.97 · 2024-09-13
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    Q
    2
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $970,297
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $59,340
    @ $148.35 · 2026-06-05
    STERIN STEVEN M
    Director
    $82,764
    @ $161.96 · 2026-05-26
    GOSS MICHAEL G.
    Officer
    $160,677
    @ $84.79 · 2025-12-11
    KEMP JON D
    Chief Executive Officer
    $480,732
    @ $85.01 · 2025-12-11
    NOONAN ANNE P
    Director
    $534.00
    @ $76.29 · 2025-11-21
    KANG SANG HO
    Officer
    $186,250
    @ $74.50 · 2025-11-21
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(56/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    Q
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(64/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    NVDA
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
    Q
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
    View NVDA Full AnalysisView Q Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: NVDA vs Q

    Is NVIDIA Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, NVDA trades at a -29.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $163 vs. price $211), compared to Q's -34.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $125 vs. $169).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, NVIDIA Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    NVDA scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while Q scores 47/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Qnity Electronics, Inc. in financial distress?

    Q's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NVDA scores 66.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, NVIDIA Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) generates a 2.8% free cash flow yield, compared to NVIDIA Corporation's 1.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NVIDIA Corporation or Qnity Electronics, Inc.?

    NVDA earns 63.1% ROIC versus Q's 7.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, NVIDIA Corporation's or Qnity Electronics, Inc.'s?

    NVDA's dividend earns a safety score of 91/100 (Very Safe), compared to Q's 85/100 (Very Safe). NVDA has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

    Does NVIDIA Corporation have accounting red flags?

    NVDA's Beneish M-Score of -1.1 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, Q scores -2.6, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.