Compare StocksNUE vs ORCL

Nucor Corporation (NUE) vs Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

NUE
Nucor Corporation
$226.04
VS
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
$171.83

Rewards

NUE
  • PEG ratio of 0.06 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.42 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
ORCL
  • Oracle Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 67.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Oracle Corporation scores 71/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

NUE
  • ROIC has declined by 25.6 percentage points over the observed period, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 14.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Nucor Corporation scores only 29/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
ORCL
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 4 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • High leverage (4.15x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.5x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NUE
ORCL
Valuation
$-395.12M
Free Cash Flow
$-22.30B
-0.77%
FCF Yield
-4.51%
22.42
Trailing P/E
30.85
14.44
Forward P/E
21.39
Quality & Moat
10.76%
ROIC
8.22%
7.73%
ROE
31.86%
14.06%
Gross Margin
67.08%
0.06
PEG Ratio
1.26
Balance Sheet Safety
0.32
Debt / Equity
4.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.94
Net Debt / EBITDA
4.48
0.99%
Dividend Yield
1.16%
NUE: 8Ties: 1ORCL: 3
NUEORCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NUE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

ORCL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NUE
$0.57
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$6.75B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.83B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ORCL
$17.69
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$18.61B
Δ Market Cap
+$329.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NUE
57.2% Overvalued
Price is 57.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.04
Fair Value: $143.83
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ORCL
246.9% Overvalued
Price is 246.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $171.83
Fair Value: $49.53
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NUE

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

ORCL

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NUE
29/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ORCL
71/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NUE
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ORCL
-2.57
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NUE
Insiders 3.2%Institutions 78.8%Retail & Other 18.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,743
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ORCL
Insiders 40.5%Institutions 44.1%Retail & Other 15.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NUE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ORCL
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $112,258
FAIRHEAD RONA ALISON
Director
$112,258
@ $233.87 · 2025-07-07
MOORMAN CHARLES W IV
Director
$947,913
@ $172.35 · 2025-02-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NUE
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $22.62M
TOPALIAN LEON J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.87M
@ $162.18 · 2026-03-23
QUERY KENNETH REX
Officer
$1.46M
@ $196.02 · 2026-02-11
BEHR ALLEN C.
Officer
$2.78M
@ $184.80 · 2026-02-03
NEEDHAM DANIEL R.
Officer
$690,818
@ $178.00 · 2026-01-30
BATTERBEE THOMAS J.
Officer
$330,550
@ $165.28 · 2025-12-23
TOPALIAN LEON J
Chief Executive Officer
$789,950
@ $157.99 · 2025-12-19
BEHR ALLEN C.
Officer
$939,446
@ $157.89 · 2025-12-19
HOLLATZ JOHN J
Officer
$1.05M
@ $149.88 · 2025-11-12
BEHR ALLEN C.
Officer
$1.37M
@ $151.28 · 2025-10-30
LAXTON STEPHEN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$303,599
@ $151.57 · 2025-10-30
KELLER MICHAEL D
Officer
$903,522
@ $148.41 · 2025-08-22
QUERY KENNETH REX
Officer
$1.45M
@ $144.90 · 2025-08-18
NEEDHAM DANIEL R.
Officer
$1.05M
@ $146.00 · 2025-08-18
TOPALIAN LEON J
Chief Executive Officer
$4.27M
@ $143.27 · 2025-07-31
BEHR ALLEN C.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $143.38 · 2025-07-31
QUERY KENNETH REX
Officer
$1.30M
@ $130.37 · 2025-06-26
NEEDHAM DANIEL R.
Officer
$906,343
@ $127.87 · 2025-06-24
TOPALIAN LEON J
Chief Executive Officer
$4.11M
@ $120.19 · 2025-05-01
BEHR ALLEN C.
Officer
$793,470
@ $159.72 · 2024-11-11
TOPALIAN LEON J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.86M
@ $169.11 · 2024-11-06
MURPHY GREGORY JOSEPH
Officer
$1.04M
@ $167.82 · 2024-11-06
LAXTON STEPHEN D.
Chief Financial Officer
$798,815
@ $169.53 · 2024-11-06
QUERY KENNETH REX
Officer
$1.32M
@ $146.80 · 2024-10-29
NEEDHAM DANIEL R.
Officer
$1.38M
@ $160.00 · 2024-07-31
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ORCL
2
Sells (3M)
22
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.90B
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$2.64M
@ $176.19 · 2026-04-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.55M
@ $155.23 · 2026-02-09
KEHRING DOUGLAS A
Officer
$6.82M
@ $194.89 · 2026-01-15
HURA MARK
Officer
$2.95M
@ $196.89 · 2025-12-24
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$437,064
@ $196.61 · 2025-12-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.93M
@ $192.52 · 2025-12-19
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.80M
@ $280.31 · 2025-10-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Chief Executive Officer
$11.07M
@ $276.64 · 2025-10-21
LEVEY STUART A
Officer
$5.93M
@ $300.00 · 2025-10-10
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$641,958
@ $288.91 · 2025-09-26
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$10.87M
@ $321.16 · 2025-09-23
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$5.12M
@ $313.60 · 2025-09-16
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
President
$6.31M
@ $297.11 · 2025-09-12
SICILIA MICHAEL D
Officer
$4.04M
@ $254.48 · 2025-08-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$770,656
@ $233.32 · 2025-07-16
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$2.33M
@ $232.99 · 2025-07-03
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$267.24M
@ $212.01 · 2025-06-27
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$794.64M
@ $212.50 · 2025-06-26
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$764.01M
@ $206.77 · 2025-06-23
MAGOUYRK CLAYTON M
Officer
$3.21M
@ $214.10 · 2025-06-17
CONRADES GEORGE HENRY
Director
$1.74M
@ $213.49 · 2025-06-17
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$428,562
@ $149.53 · 2025-05-05
SELIGMAN NAOMI O
Director
$291,620
@ $145.81 · 2025-04-02
CATZ SAFRA A
Chief Executive Officer
$705.46M
@ $185.40 · 2025-01-24
SMITH MARIA
Officer
$1.04M
@ $165.00 · 2024-09-16
ELLISON LAWRENCE JOSEPH
Chief Technology Officer
$322.05M
@ $143.13 · 2024-07-16
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$60.58M
@ $141.91 · 2024-07-10
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$5.22M
@ $140.19 · 2024-06-26
SCREVEN EDWARD LLOYD
Officer
$34.04M
@ $144.30 · 2024-06-20
BOSKIN MICHAEL J
Director
$5.30M
@ $117.74 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NUE
FearGreed
😏Greed(74/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ORCL
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NUE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
ORCL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View NUE Full AnalysisView ORCL Full Analysis
NUE vs ORCL: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io