Compare Stocks › NRG vs V

NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) vs Visa Inc. (V): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, NRG is overvalued at $96, with a DCF intrinsic value of $70 and a margin of safety of -38%. V is overvalued at $414, with an intrinsic value of $328 and a margin of safety of -26%. Of the two, V has the wider margin of safety.

NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
$96.06
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$413.59

Rewards

NRG
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 17% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.41 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
V
  • ★Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Gross margin of 97.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

NRG
  • ⚠ROIC has declined by 5.4 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • ⚠Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠High leverage (4.80x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
V
  • ⚠FCF yield of 2.7% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NRG
V
Valuation
$772.37M
Free Cash Flow
$21.12B
3.82%
FCF Yield
2.73%
25.15
Trailing P/E
33.57
9.11
Forward P/E
24.14
Quality & Moat
11.80%
ROIC
39.72%
23.77%
ROE
63.51%
18.80%
Gross Margin
97.68%
0.41
PEG Ratio
1.87
Balance Sheet Safety
4.80
Net Debt / Equity
0.22
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
7.16
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.25
1.98%
Dividend Yield
0.65%
NRG: 5Ties: 1V: 6
NRGV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NRG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NRG
$39.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$590.0M
Δ Market Cap
+$23.01B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.46
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$242.97B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NRG
37.9% Overvalued
Price is 37.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $96.06
Fair Value: $69.68
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
26.1% Overvalued
Price is 26.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $413.59
Fair Value: $327.99
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NRG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $96?

+20.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.8%

The market implies +20.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $414?

+16.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +16.1%

The market implies +16.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +16.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NRG
42/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NRG
-2.54
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NRG
Insiders 4.5%Institutions 96.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,394
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 88.7%Retail & Other 11.2%
No. of Institutional Holders6,002
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NRG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NRG
1
Sells (3M)
8
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $28.77M
SPENCER GERALD ALFRED
Officer
$191,069
@ $120.93 · 2026-09-08
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$1.57M
@ $140.64 · 2026-07-15
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$2.55M
@ $127.52 · 2026-06-15
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$783,250
@ $156.65 · 2026-03-16
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.94M
@ $156.56 · 2026-01-07
CURCI BRIAN
General Counsel
$17.26M
@ $160.46 · 2026-01-06
CHUNG BRUCE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.21M
@ $158.79 · 2026-01-06
KINNEY VIRGINIA
Officer
$3.28M
@ $163.82 · 2025-11-14
LIYANEARACHCHI DAK
Chief Technology Officer
$1.65M
@ $155.00 · 2025-09-10
HOWELL KEVIN T
Director
$7.72M
@ $154.50 · 2025-05-30
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
5
Sells (3M)
21
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $84.17M
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$687,691
@ $368.34 · 2026-09-09
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.23M
@ $379.65 · 2026-09-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$773,378
@ $381.35 · 2026-08-31
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.16M
@ $367.87 · 2026-08-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$6.65M
@ $371.00 · 2026-08-21
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$20.90M
@ $364.97 · 2026-07-30
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$729,720
@ $360.00 · 2026-07-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.61M
@ $343.99 · 2026-07-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$7.13M
@ $340.25 · 2026-06-29
SUH CHRIS
Chief Financial Officer
$3.46M
@ $324.81 · 2026-05-12
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.70M
@ $340.14 · 2026-04-29
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NRG
FearGreed
😨Fear(29/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😏Greed(73/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NRG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (29)
V
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
View NRG Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NRG vs V

Is NRG Energy, Inc. or Visa Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, V trades at a -26.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $328 vs. price $414), compared to NRG's -37.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $70 vs. $96).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, NRG Energy, Inc. or Visa Inc.?▼

V scores 99/100 (Wide moat), while NRG scores 42/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is NRG Energy, Inc. in financial distress?▼

NRG's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. V scores 8.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, NRG Energy, Inc. or Visa Inc.?▼

NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) generates a 3.8% free cash flow yield, compared to Visa Inc.'s 2.7%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, NRG Energy, Inc. or Visa Inc.?▼

V earns 39.7% ROIC versus NRG's 11.8%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, NRG Energy, Inc.'s or Visa Inc.'s?▼

V's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to NRG's 94/100 (Very Safe). V has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

NRG vs V: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io