Compare StocksNOW vs ZBH

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) vs Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, NOW is overvalued at $116, with a DCF intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of -38%. ZBH is fairly valued at $96, with an intrinsic value of $118 and a margin of safety of 19%. Of the two, ZBH has the wider margin of safety.

NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$115.93
VS
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
$96.20

Rewards

NOW
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ZBH
  • Gross margin of 70.2% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.16 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

NOW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • 5 insider sales totaling $1.9M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
ZBH
  • FCF yield of 7.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NOW
ZBH
Valuation
$5.15B
Free Cash Flow
$1.42B
4.30%
FCF Yield
7.63%
72.46
Trailing P/E
24.92
23.16
Forward P/E
10.69
Quality & Moat
2.26%
ROIC
6.45%
14.24%
ROE
6.07%
74.77%
Gross Margin
70.18%
0.99
PEG Ratio
0.67
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Net Debt / Equity
0.56
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.31
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.75
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.02%
NOW: 5Ties: 1ZBH: 6
NOWZBH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ZBH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ZBH
$-4.43
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$2.05B
Δ Market Cap
$-9.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NOW
38.1% Overvalued
Price is 38.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $115.93
Fair Value: $83.93
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ZBH
18.7% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.7% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $96.20
Fair Value: $118.34
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $116?

+25.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.2%

The market implies +25.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +10.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

ZBH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $96?

+5.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.4%

The market implies +5.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +6.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
ZBH
68/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ZBH
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 88.9%Retail & Other 11.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,078
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ZBH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 106.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,257
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ZBH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NOW
5
Sells (3M)
37
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $23.37M
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$225,746
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$749,805
@ $990.50 · 2025-07-29
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$341,631
@ $965.06 · 2025-07-16
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$250,950
@ $1050.00 · 2025-07-03
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$283,310
@ $1011.82 · 2025-06-03
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$250,267
@ $1009.14 · 2025-06-02
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$2.07M
@ $1012.01 · 2025-05-30
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$147,900
@ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.19M
@ $1020.00 · 2025-05-30
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$433,825
@ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$216,913
@ $1013.61 · 2025-05-27
LUDDY FREDERIC B
Director
$428,000
@ $1000.00 · 2025-05-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ZBH
1
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.19M
YI SANG
Officer
$413,216
@ $82.64 · 2026-05-29
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$250,849
@ $94.66 · 2026-03-12
YI SANG
Officer
$96,490
@ $96.49 · 2026-02-12
YI SANG
Officer
$124,302
@ $103.58 · 2025-09-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$156,225
@ $104.15 · 2025-09-08
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$153,735
@ $102.49 · 2025-08-18
YI SANG
Officer
$74,011
@ $92.51 · 2025-06-13
YI SANG
Officer
$95,000
@ $95.00 · 2025-06-11
WINKLER LORI
Officer
$150,649
@ $104.40 · 2025-03-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NOW
FearGreed
😨Fear(38/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ZBH
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NOW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (38)
ZBH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View NOW Full AnalysisView ZBH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NOW vs ZBH

Is ServiceNow, Inc. or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, ZBH trades at a 18.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $118 vs. price $96), compared to NOW's -38.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $116).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ServiceNow, Inc. or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

ZBH scores 68/100 (Narrow moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. in financial distress?

ZBH's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NOW scores 8.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, ServiceNow, Inc. or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) generates a 7.6% free cash flow yield, compared to ServiceNow, Inc.'s 4.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ServiceNow, Inc. or Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.?

ZBH earns 6.5% ROIC versus NOW's 2.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.