Compare StocksNOW vs TSCO

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, NOW is overvalued at $139, with a DCF intrinsic value of $84 and a margin of safety of -66%. TSCO is overvalued at $33, with an intrinsic value of $29 and a margin of safety of -15%. Of the two, TSCO has the wider margin of safety.

NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$139.09
VS
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
$33.05

Rewards

NOW
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TSCO
  • Tractor Supply Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Tractor Supply Company scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

NOW
  • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
TSCO
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.04 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • High leverage (2.40x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NOW
TSCO
Valuation
$5.15B
Free Cash Flow
$740.49M
3.58%
FCF Yield
4.30%
87.47
Trailing P/E
17.22
27.79
Forward P/E
16.14
Quality & Moat
2.26%
ROIC
16.37%
14.24%
ROE
39.51%
74.77%
Gross Margin
36.50%
1.01
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Net Debt / Equity
2.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.31
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.93%
NOW: 5Ties: 1TSCO: 6
NOWTSCO

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TSCO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TSCO
$0.82
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$1.89B
Δ Market Cap
+$1.55B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NOW
65.6% Overvalued
Price is 65.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $139.09
Fair Value: $83.97
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TSCO
15.3% Overvalued
Price is 15.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $33.05
Fair Value: $28.67
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $139?

+27.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +12.6%

The market implies +27.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +12.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TSCO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $33?

+8.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +8.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TSCO
86/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TSCO
-2.60
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.0%
No. of Institutional Holders3,128
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TSCO
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 96.8%Retail & Other 2.9%
No. of Institutional Holders1,482
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TSCO
4
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $658,321
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,975
@ $35.42 · 2026-09-04
MORRIS EDNA K
Director
$50,606
@ $32.44 · 2026-08-04
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$501,524
@ $32.15 · 2026-08-04
HAWAUX ANDRE J
Director
$100,264
@ $31.83 · 2026-08-03
HAM MARGARET M
Director
$2,952
@ $30.43 · 2026-06-08
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TSCO
0
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.96M
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$618,263
@ $55.35 · 2026-02-13
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.23M
@ $54.03 · 2026-02-11
MILLS ROBERT D.
Chief Technology Officer
$3.41M
@ $54.12 · 2026-02-11
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$101,378
@ $53.81 · 2026-02-10
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$104,050
@ $53.94 · 2026-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.50M
@ $53.16 · 2026-02-03
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$377,426
@ $59.79 · 2025-08-13
WEIKEL MARK J
Director
$479,360
@ $59.92 · 2025-08-07
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$390,121
@ $58.40 · 2025-07-28
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.76M
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
ELLISON-SOUTHALL NONI L
General Counsel
$332,592
@ $63.96 · 2025-07-24
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$68,152
@ $58.50 · 2025-07-22
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$115,500
@ $57.75 · 2025-07-10
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$57,000
@ $57.00 · 2025-07-09
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$2.01M
@ $56.00 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$258,965
@ $55.93 · 2025-07-07
JACKSON DENISE L
Director
$85,250
@ $55.00 · 2025-07-02
ESTEP JONATHAN S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $53.00 · 2025-06-23
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
President
$145,446
@ $51.76 · 2025-05-14
RUBIN MATTHEW LAWRENCE
Officer
$222,091
@ $57.69 · 2025-02-20
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$680,176
@ $56.00 · 2025-02-13
YANKEE COLIN
Officer
$1.33M
@ $54.15 · 2025-02-11
KERSEY MELISSA
Officer
$494,472
@ $53.17 · 2025-02-06
LAWTON HARRY A III
Chief Executive Officer
$4.81M
@ $54.59 · 2025-02-03
BARTON KURT D.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.96M
@ $295.64 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NOW
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TSCO
FearGreed
😨Fear(31/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NOW
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
TSCO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
View NOW Full AnalysisView TSCO Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NOW vs TSCO

Is ServiceNow, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, TSCO trades at a -15.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $29 vs. price $33), compared to NOW's -65.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $84 vs. $139).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ServiceNow, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company?

TSCO scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, ServiceNow, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company?

Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) generates a 4.3% free cash flow yield, compared to ServiceNow, Inc.'s 3.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ServiceNow, Inc. or Tractor Supply Company?

TSCO earns 16.4% ROIC versus NOW's 2.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

NOW vs TSCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io