Compare Stocks › NOW vs TRGP

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) vs Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, NOW is overvalued at $105, with a DCF intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of -38%. TRGP is overvalued at $315, with an intrinsic value of $14 and a margin of safety of -2159%. Of the two, NOW has the wider margin of safety.

NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$105.12
VS
TRGP
Targa Resources Corp.
$314.99

Rewards

NOW
  • ★Gross margin of 73.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
TRGP
  • ★Targa Resources Corp. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.97 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

NOW
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
TRGP
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • ⚠Trailing P/E of 30.1x is 28% above the historical average of 23.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • ⚠High leverage (5.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NOW
TRGP
Valuation
$5.75B
Free Cash Flow
$584.10M
5.27%
FCF Yield
0.86%
75.63
Trailing P/E
30.11
21.89
Forward P/E
26.00
Quality & Moat
9.85%
ROIC
15.73%
11.85%
ROE
70.84%
73.08%
Gross Margin
43.19%
0.76
PEG Ratio
1.25
Balance Sheet Safety
0.29
Net Debt / Equity
5.12
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.54
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.59%
NOW: 7Ties: 1TRGP: 4
NOWTRGP

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

TRGP

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
TRGP
$8.45
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.72B
Δ Market Cap
+$22.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NOW
38.4% Overvalued
Price is 38.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.12
Fair Value: $75.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
TRGP
418.8% Overvalued
Price is 418.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $314.99
Fair Value: $60.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $105?

+23.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.4%

The market implies +23.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

TRGP

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $315?

+18.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +35.6%

The market implies +18.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +35.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
TRGP
54/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
TRGP
-3.07
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,205
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
TRGP
Insiders 1.4%Institutions 98.0%Retail & Other 0.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,512
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
TRGP
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
TRGP
2
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $30.27M
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$870,690
@ $290.23 · 2026-08-25
DAVIS WATERS S IV
Director
$719,209
@ $299.67 · 2026-08-21
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$2.71M
@ $255.96 · 2026-05-12
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$5.93M
@ $241.34 · 2026-03-05
BRANSTETTER BENJAMIN JAMES
Officer
$778,124
@ $238.83 · 2026-03-02
MCDONIE PATRICK J
Officer
$7.55M
@ $239.36 · 2026-03-02
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$100,797
@ $231.72 · 2026-02-26
PRYOR DOUGLAS SCOTT
Officer
$4.01M
@ $228.92 · 2026-02-25
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$311,619
@ $229.30 · 2026-02-24
KNEALE JENNIFER R
President
$6.79M
@ $230.12 · 2026-02-24
SHRADER GERALD R
General Counsel
$498,328
@ $181.21 · 2025-12-05
COOKSEN LINDSEY M
Director
$208,042
@ $198.14 · 2025-02-28
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$1.26M
@ $202.91 · 2025-02-28
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$378,167
@ $194.23 · 2025-02-25
MELOY MATTHEW J
Chief Executive Officer
$9.53M
@ $195.08 · 2025-02-25
DAVIS WATERS S IV
Director
$429,802
@ $196.26 · 2025-02-25
KNEALE JENNIFER R
Officer
$5.75M
@ $192.42 · 2025-02-25
MURARO ROBERT M
Officer
$505,736
@ $202.29 · 2024-12-02
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$1.91M
@ $190.52 · 2024-11-15
CRISP CHARLES RICHARD
Director
$1.14M
@ $190.68 · 2024-11-08
BOUSHKA JULIE H.
Officer
$621,809
@ $190.74 · 2024-11-08
CHUNG PAUL W
Director
$3.43M
@ $190.03 · 2024-11-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NOW
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
TRGP
FearGreed
😏Greed(70/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NOW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
TRGP
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (70)
View NOW Full AnalysisView TRGP Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NOW vs TRGP

Is ServiceNow, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, NOW trades at a -38.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $76 vs. price $105), compared to TRGP's -2158.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $14 vs. $315).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ServiceNow, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?▼

NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while TRGP scores 54/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Targa Resources Corp. in financial distress?▼

TRGP's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. NOW scores 8.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, ServiceNow, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?▼

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Targa Resources Corp.'s 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ServiceNow, Inc. or Targa Resources Corp.?▼

TRGP earns 15.7% ROIC versus NOW's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

NOW vs TRGP: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io