Compare Stocks › NOW vs PG

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) vs The Procter & Gamble Company (PG): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, NOW is overvalued at $105, with a DCF intrinsic value of $76 and a margin of safety of -38%. PG is overvalued at $162, with an intrinsic value of $124 and a margin of safety of -30%. Of the two, PG has the wider margin of safety.

NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
$105.12
VS
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
$161.57

Rewards

NOW
  • ★Gross margin of 73.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 27.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.22 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PG
  • ★The Procter & Gamble Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★The Procter & Gamble Company scores 92/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

NOW
  • ⚠Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — stock-based compensation is offsetting repurchases.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
PG
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 4.15 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠18 insider sales totaling $13.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
NOW
PG
Valuation
$5.75B
Free Cash Flow
$12.65B
5.27%
FCF Yield
3.38%
75.63
Trailing P/E
24.33
21.89
Forward P/E
21.85
Quality & Moat
9.85%
ROIC
19.80%
11.85%
ROE
29.61%
73.08%
Gross Margin
50.59%
0.76
PEG Ratio
4.15
Balance Sheet Safety
0.29
Net Debt / Equity
0.43
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.18
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.94
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.69%
NOW: 4Ties: 2PG: 6
NOWPG

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
NOW

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
NOW
$16.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.90B
Δ Market Cap
+$81.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PG
$1.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$17.48B
Δ Market Cap
+$29.32B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
NOW
38.4% Overvalued
Price is 38.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $105.12
Fair Value: $75.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PG
30.3% Overvalued
Price is 30.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $161.57
Fair Value: $124.02
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
NOW

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $105?

+23.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.4%

The market implies +23.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +7.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $162?

+10.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +13.9%

The market implies +10.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +13.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
NOW
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PG
92/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
NOW
-2.87
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PG
-2.63
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
NOW
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 84.7%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,205
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PG
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 71.8%Retail & Other 28.1%
No. of Institutional Holders5,035
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
NOW
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.00M
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $104.60 · 2026-02-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
NOW
4
Sells (3M)
27
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.26M
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$300,777
@ $147.87 · 2026-08-31
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.08M
@ $138.00 · 2026-08-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$365,851
@ $135.50 · 2026-08-27
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$188,400
@ $125.60 · 2026-08-13
BRIGGS TERESA
Director
$173,376
@ $108.70 · 2026-05-28
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$103,238
@ $98.51 · 2026-05-18
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.48M
@ $90.14 · 2026-05-14
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$130,845
@ $87.23 · 2026-05-14
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$13,661
@ $90.47 · 2026-05-08
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$799,868
@ $89.60 · 2026-04-24
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$376,142
@ $101.77 · 2026-02-23
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.02M
@ $105.93 · 2026-02-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$147,994
@ $105.71 · 2026-02-13
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$151,755
@ $101.17 · 2026-02-12
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$352,750
@ $850.00 · 2025-12-05
JACKSON LAWRENCE
Director
$214,708
@ $810.22 · 2025-11-28
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$336,936
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$242,400
@ $808.00 · 2025-11-28
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$431,736
@ $827.08 · 2025-11-18
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$160,155
@ $838.51 · 2025-11-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$200,549
@ $839.12 · 2025-11-18
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$249,353
@ $817.55 · 2025-11-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$235,894
@ $842.48 · 2025-11-14
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$52,848
@ $852.39 · 2025-11-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$56,257
@ $852.38 · 2025-11-13
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$164,997
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$222,012
@ $863.86 · 2025-11-10
SANDS ANITA M
Director
$1.00M
@ $915.11 · 2025-08-29
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$5.34M
@ $916.63 · 2025-08-28
ELMER RUSSELL S.
General Counsel
$1.50M
@ $884.26 · 2025-08-20
FIPPS PAUL G.
Officer
$1.30M
@ $895.32 · 2025-08-20
MCDERMOTT WILLIAM R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.43M
@ $900.00 · 2025-08-19
TZITZON NICHOLAS
Officer
$1.49M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$1.53M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$1.35M
@ $866.45 · 2025-08-18
MCBRIDE KEVIN THOMAS
Officer
$238,496
@ $851.77 · 2025-08-15
CHAMBERLAIN PAUL EDWARD
Director
$258,000
@ $860.00 · 2025-08-14
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$72,288
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
CANNEY JACQUELINE P
Officer
$57,658
@ $860.57 · 2025-08-13
MASTANTUONO GINA
President
$256,490
@ $878.39 · 2025-08-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PG
18
Sells (3M)
26
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $69.22M
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$671,929
@ $160.71 · 2026-10-23
GAMA PAUL
Officer
$698,460
@ $161.27 · 2026-10-23
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Executive Officer
$5.71M
@ $163.09 · 2026-10-23
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$344,310
@ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$568,861
@ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
GAMA PAUL
Officer
$323,382
@ $145.34 · 2026-10-05
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$52,141
@ $145.24 · 2026-08-24
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$491,274
@ $143.02 · 2026-08-21
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$22,431
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$776,754
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$290,312
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
BHARUCHA FREDDY P
Officer
$35,372
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
GAMA PAUL
Officer
$488,311
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
ABD EL HAK HESHAM
Officer
$278,377
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Executive Officer
$888,047
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-20
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$438,991
@ $143.79 · 2026-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$1.24M
@ $144.00 · 2026-08-18
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$917,199
@ $165.29 · 2026-02-27
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$288,454
@ $159.45 · 2026-02-19
AGUILAR MOSES VICTOR JAVIER
Officer
$2.46M
@ $162.28 · 2026-02-13
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$5.86M
@ $162.33 · 2026-02-12
MOELLER JON R
Officer and Director
$28.12M
@ $162.29 · 2026-02-12
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$2.06M
@ $160.31 · 2026-02-11
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.26M
@ $158.00 · 2026-02-04
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$14.50M
@ $151.15 · 2026-01-23
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$108,438
@ $149.57 · 2025-10-30
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$538,139
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$491,252
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$366,574
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$647,289
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$74,594
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$606,796
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$1.78M
@ $152.23 · 2025-10-02
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$156,835
@ $156.84 · 2025-08-29
COOMBE GARY A
Officer
$1.61M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
RAMAN SUNDAR G.
Officer
$1.51M
@ $158.16 · 2025-08-21
DAVIS JENNIFER L
Officer
$1.35M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
WHALEY SUSAN STREET
Officer
$969,908
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JANZARUK MATTHEW W.
Officer
$50,170
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
SCHULTEN ANDRE
Chief Financial Officer
$1.83M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PURUSHOTHAMAN BALAJI
Officer
$95,308
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
JEJURIKAR SHAILESH
Chief Operating Officer
$2.05M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
FRANCISCO MA. FATIMA
Officer
$1.43M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
PRITCHARD MARC S
Officer
$1.55M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
MOELLER JON R
Chief Executive Officer
$6.31M
@ $157.27 · 2025-08-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
NOW
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PG
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
NOW
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
PG
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
View NOW Full AnalysisView PG Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: NOW vs PG

Is ServiceNow, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PG trades at a -30.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $124 vs. price $162), compared to NOW's -38.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $76 vs. $105).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, ServiceNow, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

PG scores 92/100 (Wide moat), while NOW scores 61/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, ServiceNow, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) generates a 5.3% free cash flow yield, compared to The Procter & Gamble Company's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, ServiceNow, Inc. or The Procter & Gamble Company?▼

PG earns 19.8% ROIC versus NOW's 9.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

NOW vs PG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io